Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Prince Harry Telegraph interview

186 replies

AtIusvue · 11/04/2025 19:01

Delusional as ever. He claims it was the RF removing his security to trap him. Completely disregarding that the RF have no say over such matters and its an issue for the Home Secretary/RAVEC.

Imagine what must go on in his mind. Stay away from drugs kids.

https://archive.ph/gn01o

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2025/04/11/prince-harry-police-protection-withdrawn-trap-royal-family/

‘He suggested that he would find it hard to forgive his treatment and added that his “worst fears have been confirmed” by secret evidence he had heard in court.
The Duke believes his taxpayer-funded security was removed in a failed attempt force him to stay in Britain, after he announced they were stepping back from public duties and moving to the US.’

‘The Duke made clear that he will continue to fight for what he regards as justice, whatever the outcome of the case.
When he believes he has uncovered a wrong, he said, he is unable to let things lie and feels the need to “get under the bonnet and fix it”, adding that he was “driven by exposing injustice”’

And of course he’s been shocked by all the secrets revealed during the trial ….which of course he can’t tell you about. Convenient that?

OP posts:
BemusedAmerican · 14/04/2025 03:33

Harry would be the next James II, and Archie the new Old Pretender.

Lisapieces · 14/04/2025 09:11

I don’t think Harry would want the job. He hasn’t remotely got the temperament and if he was still married to Meghan she would be as likely to be queen as Wallis Simpson.

They really are that abdication story for our time without the abdication part. People are completely obsessed with them often for the wrong reasons, to just hate on them, or else they would have settled into obscurity by now. They can only be relevant for as long as people’s interest positive or negative holds and it is holding solidly.

MayaKovskaya · 14/04/2025 09:19

That's probably their aim now. Any publicity is good publicity. They're controversial figures, their words and behaviour are often very puzzling and contradictory, plus he's the King's son. All good clickbait. They've done well in that respect.

NewAgeNewMe · 14/04/2025 09:36

Lisapieces · 14/04/2025 09:11

I don’t think Harry would want the job. He hasn’t remotely got the temperament and if he was still married to Meghan she would be as likely to be queen as Wallis Simpson.

They really are that abdication story for our time without the abdication part. People are completely obsessed with them often for the wrong reasons, to just hate on them, or else they would have settled into obscurity by now. They can only be relevant for as long as people’s interest positive or negative holds and it is holding solidly.

Oh I’d say he does want the job. Whether he’d get it is another matter. He’s shown to the world he’s economical with the actual truth, can’t keep secrets and bland to the media. He’s volatile. Would you want that as your head of state? I know I wouldn’t!

Espresso25 · 14/04/2025 09:37

MayaKovskaya · 14/04/2025 09:19

That's probably their aim now. Any publicity is good publicity. They're controversial figures, their words and behaviour are often very puzzling and contradictory, plus he's the King's son. All good clickbait. They've done well in that respect.

Yes making a living just by existing, the dream really!

NewAgeNewMe · 14/04/2025 10:03

NewAgeNewMe · 14/04/2025 09:36

Oh I’d say he does want the job. Whether he’d get it is another matter. He’s shown to the world he’s economical with the actual truth, can’t keep secrets and bland to the media. He’s volatile. Would you want that as your head of state? I know I wouldn’t!

Blabs to the media not bland. Spell correct at it’s finest!

utterexasperation · 14/04/2025 12:19

@NewAgeNewMe you were right with bland though 🤭

Cynic17 · 14/04/2025 12:20

BasiliskStare · 13/04/2025 22:10

I'm a supporter of a constitutional monarchy but I might chain myself to BP's railings if Harry acceded to the throne. Either that or a sternly worded letter to the Telegraph. 😊

Ditto!

Nominative · 14/04/2025 17:31

BunnyLake · 13/04/2025 21:18

So technically it couldn’t happen until Louis reached adulthood as he’s the youngest. Whatever happens in the future H&M will never be Monarchs, there'd be a revolution before that happened.

And if they all reached this decision after at least one of William's children had had a child, they would have to wait still longer for that child to reach adulthood. With any luck the whole process could continue till Harry keeled over.

stickystick · 03/05/2025 14:18

The trouble with both H and M is that they twist words to suit themselves and their victim narrative.

I don’t believe the King won’t speak to him. I think what the King actually said is that he won’t discuss the whole security arrangement saga with him, which would be inappropriate on a whole raft of levels.

But twisting words and making things sound worse than they are is 100% the Sussex playbook.

TheMovieFlopped · 03/05/2025 17:30
prince harry royalwedding GIF by BBC

What Willy think of next? 🤔

New posts on this thread. Refresh page