Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

All the focus on H & M - where's the outrage against Andrew?

1000 replies

modeoftransport · 01/04/2025 22:16

Thread after thread of pulling apart Harry and Meghan. 0.1% discussing what Andrew did?

What is going on with MN?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
22
NotNowMrTumble · 02/04/2025 10:38

If VG is still here next week does she have to give the money back?

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 10:39

19340201a · 02/04/2025 10:36

The words 'Sussex Squad' are in inverted commas. There's a reason the media do that.

Did you bother looking at the screenshot?
absolutely nothing can excuse this!!!

vera99 · 02/04/2025 10:40

I'll hazard a guess here the Royals probably collectively don't think Andrew has done anything wrong except been caught in Epstein's filthy web of trafficked women and in the mdoern era that is a very bad look. He was apparently still HMTLQ's favourite son. Says it all really. The little people are there to be used and abused and thrown away after they cease to have any residual value. I'm minded to think all this Charles is going after him and pushing him out of his big house etc is all just PR.

Vespanest · 02/04/2025 10:41

modeoftransport · 02/04/2025 10:25

Did you read the OP?

Thread after thread of pulling apart Harry and Meghan. 0.1% discussing what Andrew did?
What is going on with MN?

The point of a thread is to start some discussion, the only discussion that you have instigated is linking coverage of h and m versus Andrew. But you have offered no points of interest to talk about Andrew.

19340201a · 02/04/2025 10:42

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 10:39

Did you bother looking at the screenshot?
absolutely nothing can excuse this!!!

I'm not excusing it in the slightest.

I'm just saying you can't prove that it was someone related to Harry and Meghan - it could be anyone.

Anyone could pose as anyone and do the same.

Whoever said it is clearly a massive twat though.

user9632579 · 02/04/2025 10:43

andyouwillknowusbythetrailofdead · 02/04/2025 06:50

Oh DFOD. Harry is white, Meghan is as white as she is black. The criticism of them isn't racist.

The thing with Andrew is there's no debate. Everyone knows he's a piece of shit. There's nothing to discuss, and he's not doing anything new to talk about.

Her white side has no relevance here. Racists only care for the non-white parts.

user9632579 · 02/04/2025 10:45

Mightymoog · 02/04/2025 07:51

Oh give over with your patronising racism

Which racism!

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 10:45

19340201a · 02/04/2025 10:42

I'm not excusing it in the slightest.

I'm just saying you can't prove that it was someone related to Harry and Meghan - it could be anyone.

Anyone could pose as anyone and do the same.

Whoever said it is clearly a massive twat though.

If a variety of newspapers feel comfortable publishing and reporting that these posts were made by the Sussex squad then they obviously aren’t worried about being sued!
thats enough proof for me in light of Harry’s friend releasing a disgusting article with Harry’s blessing.

user9632579 · 02/04/2025 10:46

Munnygirl · 02/04/2025 08:14

Oh please

Sorry?

user9632579 · 02/04/2025 10:47

Mightymoog · 02/04/2025 08:18

I know.
Fascinating that people who scream racism fail to see they are being so racist themselves.
Suppose they thik it's an easy way to shut down any comments.

I am unable to be racist to a white person.

Highlighting racism and the difference of equality is not racist. The only ones who get offended are those who cannot acknowledge their privilege.

19340201a · 02/04/2025 10:49

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 10:45

If a variety of newspapers feel comfortable publishing and reporting that these posts were made by the Sussex squad then they obviously aren’t worried about being sued!
thats enough proof for me in light of Harry’s friend releasing a disgusting article with Harry’s blessing.

My point was they use inverted commas around 'Sussex Squad' for a reason! Because they can't prove anything. Not because it definitely was or wasn't them. If they hadn't used inverted commas then yes they would be open to be sued.

user9632579 · 02/04/2025 10:49

Onafp · 02/04/2025 09:57

Oh don't be so absolutely ridiculous

Are you black?

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 10:49

user9632579 · 02/04/2025 10:47

I am unable to be racist to a white person.

Highlighting racism and the difference of equality is not racist. The only ones who get offended are those who cannot acknowledge their privilege.

How are you unable to be racist to a white person?

Munnygirl · 02/04/2025 10:49

user9632579 · 02/04/2025 10:47

I am unable to be racist to a white person.

Highlighting racism and the difference of equality is not racist. The only ones who get offended are those who cannot acknowledge their privilege.

Oh please (again)

user9632579 · 02/04/2025 10:50

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 10:49

How are you unable to be racist to a white person?

I'm black.

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 10:50

19340201a · 02/04/2025 10:49

My point was they use inverted commas around 'Sussex Squad' for a reason! Because they can't prove anything. Not because it definitely was or wasn't them. If they hadn't used inverted commas then yes they would be open to be sued.

Edited

They didn’t use inverted commas further down the article! As shown in the screenshot!

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 10:51

user9632579 · 02/04/2025 10:50

I'm black.

And?

ThisUniqueDreamer · 02/04/2025 10:52

Vespanest · 01/04/2025 22:53

What do you want people to say, he's a dickhead now and he'll be a dickhead tomorrow. There not much more to discuss as there no opposition.

Everyone knows he's a prick and what he did.

H&M still provide entertaining tomfoolery in thinking they're of any importance to anyone anymore. That's why.

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 10:52

You are aware that everyone is capable of being racist?
racism means exactly that, abusing and othering people of a different race to your own.

19340201a · 02/04/2025 10:55

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 10:50

They didn’t use inverted commas further down the article! As shown in the screenshot!

"One insider who has worked with Sentebale told MailOnline: 'While the pile-on has nothing to do with the Sussexes themselves, it doesn't look good that much of the venom is from their fans."

And this is from the article as well. I've highlighted the relevant part for you.

There's also a possibility that the person isn't a fan of them but a troll posing as one.

Again I don't agree with whatever was posted, it was clearly awful but a lot of people online aren't who they purport to be.

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 10:59

19340201a · 02/04/2025 10:55

"One insider who has worked with Sentebale told MailOnline: 'While the pile-on has nothing to do with the Sussexes themselves, it doesn't look good that much of the venom is from their fans."

And this is from the article as well. I've highlighted the relevant part for you.

There's also a possibility that the person isn't a fan of them but a troll posing as one.

Again I don't agree with whatever was posted, it was clearly awful but a lot of people online aren't who they purport to be.

So you are saying all the hundreds of racist tweets and abuses that Sophie suffered forcing her to close down her twitter from self proclaimed squad members were in fact fake and just pretending to be fans of the Sussex’s?

well I’m shocked that you seriously believe this ! But obviously you can’t explain to someone who is deliberately misleading themselves!

user9632579 · 02/04/2025 11:01

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 10:51

And?

You asked a question, I answered it.

19340201a · 02/04/2025 11:01

@jeffgoldblum Of course I am not saying that.

I'm saying that particularly offensive specific tweet you mention above cannot be proven either way as being someone pro or anti MM.

Vespanest · 02/04/2025 11:04

This thread is like reverse Uno instead of a thread descending into what about Andrew, this is beginning with it. What about Andrew is used to silence discussion on H And M not to ignite it.

jeffgoldblum · 02/04/2025 11:04

19340201a · 02/04/2025 11:01

@jeffgoldblum Of course I am not saying that.

I'm saying that particularly offensive specific tweet you mention above cannot be proven either way as being someone pro or anti MM.

Sadly there are much worse on twitter!! That can be !
and Trevor Phillips is receiving it now too!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.