Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.

1000 replies

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:22

Commissionable links- means when a potential customer clicks on the link, it's attributed to the affiliate, allowing the brand to record the source of the traffic. If someone buys a product using an affiliate link, the brand will pay the affiliate marketer commission on the sale

But she’s not an influencer?

This is really sad actually.

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.
OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
ThatHazelGuide · 24/03/2025 16:24

She mustn't have enough money yet

Penko25 · 24/03/2025 16:31

Oh dear. She’s getting desperate.

jeffgoldblum · 24/03/2025 16:44

I saw that and was about to plop it on a thread!!! 🤣
its in the daily mail now too!

stayathomer · 24/03/2025 16:48

everyone in life has goals and aspirations, some people want to be self made- why does it bother you? And anyone came make anything sound rubbish- the word flogging is a bit mean isn’t it? Why do so many people hate a person they don’t know?!

Mylovelygreendress · 24/03/2025 16:48

Oh dear what happened to all the big ideas they announced in 2020 ?

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:48

I don’t understand how she can use her title in the same post where states she gets a commission for selling the clothes?

OP posts:
AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:49

jeffgoldblum · 24/03/2025 16:44

I saw that and was about to plop it on a thread!!! 🤣
its in the daily mail now too!

Great minds think alike 😉

OP posts:
IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 16:51

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:48

I don’t understand how she can use her title in the same post where states she gets a commission for selling the clothes?

Yes, it's interesting to compare it to Princess Madeleine of Sweden who just today announced that she is setting up a skincare line in partnership with the Swiss company Waleda.

There was a message on the official Swedish royal family website, clarifying that Madeleine is receiving no public funding and that this business will be done entirely in a private capacity. She will be using the name 'Madeleine Bernadotte' for all business purposes.

https://www.kungahuset.se/english/archive/press-releases/2025-03-24-princess-madeleine-embarks-on-a-new-business-venture

jeffgoldblum · 24/03/2025 16:54

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:49

Great minds think alike 😉

Indeed we do! 🤣🤣
we’ve clearly elevated our senses!

MattCauthon · 24/03/2025 16:55

I'm struggling to see the issue. this is a pretty normal commercial process. There is no reason that Meghan cannot do normal commercial things. Just like whats his face and his milk adverts in Asia or Zara and her various bits and pieces. What is the issue here?

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:55

Interesting @IcedPurple

Shes even put up a dress called ‘Windsor’ …I mean she is hawking the royal link shamelessly.

The RF need to step in.

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.
OP posts:
Vespanest · 24/03/2025 16:57

That is the perfect way of mixing royalty and private enterprise @IcedPurple , this is cheap and a bit of a piss take for someone who was hardly in the royal family. There has always been the argument that Meghan wanted to monetise the royal family above all else. Will be interesting to see the pages of colourful clothes that she loved but was banned from wearing.

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:58

MattCauthon · 24/03/2025 16:55

I'm struggling to see the issue. this is a pretty normal commercial process. There is no reason that Meghan cannot do normal commercial things. Just like whats his face and his milk adverts in Asia or Zara and her various bits and pieces. What is the issue here?

Eh….because she has her Royal title right next to the part that says she gets paid commission.

It’s shameless and against what they had agreed, Which was not to use the Royal dukedom for commercial gain.

OP posts:
Mylovelygreendress · 24/03/2025 16:58

I see the DC are being shown more. I wonder what all the Sussex supporters think about that given the condemnation C and W receive for “ trotting out “ their DC ?
And what happened to not showing photos of A and L which was one thing I did agree with and am surprised that Harry has agreed .

IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 16:59

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:55

Interesting @IcedPurple

Shes even put up a dress called ‘Windsor’ …I mean she is hawking the royal link shamelessly.

The RF need to step in.

Edited

£1000 for that ugly dress? Windsor or no Windsor, that is not a nice dress.

Her behaviour is tacky in the extreme but I'm not sure what the King can do.

IdaGlossop · 24/03/2025 16:59

This is a good development. If she can shift stuff and make a living, that's far better than trashing the Royal family for money.

Mylovelygreendress · 24/03/2025 16:59

MattCauthon · 24/03/2025 16:55

I'm struggling to see the issue. this is a pretty normal commercial process. There is no reason that Meghan cannot do normal commercial things. Just like whats his face and his milk adverts in Asia or Zara and her various bits and pieces. What is the issue here?

She could use Meghan Sussex .
It’s this nonsense that the late Queen feared . Wise woman .

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 17:00

Mylovelygreendress · 24/03/2025 16:58

I see the DC are being shown more. I wonder what all the Sussex supporters think about that given the condemnation C and W receive for “ trotting out “ their DC ?
And what happened to not showing photos of A and L which was one thing I did agree with and am surprised that Harry has agreed .

And showing a little more of Lilibets face. Bit by bit she will reveal all. This time next year the kids will be doing their own product placements and toy reviews!

OP posts:
OneWaryCat · 24/03/2025 17:00

Gosh why do people hate her so much enough to care and make a thread slagging her off? Feels like such a waste of your own energy to constantly tear another woman down. I think I know who I feel sorry for - and it's not MM!

MrsLeonFarrell · 24/03/2025 17:00

Considering how clothes worn by royals often sell out it makes sense for her to monetise this.

I wonder if they are still planning to do the foreign visits. It does seem a bit at odds with the influencer track but maybe they will change how they do them or Harry will go alone?

It shows how wise the late Queen was to remove the half in half out option and their HRHs. This would jar in a working royal but fair play to her making money the way she can. At least she is trying things and working hard. Harry just seems to float around expecting money for his very existence.

Azureshores · 24/03/2025 17:01

She's so embarrassing. A dress called the Windsor? 😂 she's just absolutely shameless isn't she?

jeffgoldblum · 24/03/2025 17:01

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:55

Interesting @IcedPurple

Shes even put up a dress called ‘Windsor’ …I mean she is hawking the royal link shamelessly.

The RF need to step in.

Edited

This is a complete example of what they were forbidden to do by the late queen!!!

MattCauthon · 24/03/2025 17:02

Um, she has a title. That is an actual thing, and she is allowed to use it. Lots of people who have titles do commercial things. I could MAYBE see your outrage if she was using the HRH title but she's not. She IS the Duchess of Sussex. That's just a fact.

I'm still struggling to see the issue here.

What exactly do you expect the royal family to do? Tell people they can't pay her?

IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 17:02

Mylovelygreendress · 24/03/2025 16:58

I see the DC are being shown more. I wonder what all the Sussex supporters think about that given the condemnation C and W receive for “ trotting out “ their DC ?
And what happened to not showing photos of A and L which was one thing I did agree with and am surprised that Harry has agreed .

Yes, there have been several entirely gratuitous photos of the children recently.

Just because we don't see their faces doesn't mean they aren't being put into the public eye. I do wonder what Harry thinks of this.

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 17:03

MattCauthon · 24/03/2025 17:02

Um, she has a title. That is an actual thing, and she is allowed to use it. Lots of people who have titles do commercial things. I could MAYBE see your outrage if she was using the HRH title but she's not. She IS the Duchess of Sussex. That's just a fact.

I'm still struggling to see the issue here.

What exactly do you expect the royal family to do? Tell people they can't pay her?

Um, she’s not allowed to use it for commercial purposes …..

OP posts:
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.