Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.

1000 replies

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:22

Commissionable links- means when a potential customer clicks on the link, it's attributed to the affiliate, allowing the brand to record the source of the traffic. If someone buys a product using an affiliate link, the brand will pay the affiliate marketer commission on the sale

But she’s not an influencer?

This is really sad actually.

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.
OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 17:29

MattCauthon · 24/03/2025 17:18

I meant I don't care as in I don't get worked up when they do stuff (well, except Andrew - he's clearly a plonker!). But I am aware of their broad activities, int he same way I follow what's happening in British politics and also in arts and entertainment.

I find I DO care when people are really aggressive and unpleasant about a woman who lives on the other side of the planet, who is not representing the royal family and who is making a living in a fairly normal way for a certain type of American celebrity/actor. I also care when people state as fact things that simply aren't true.

Find me a single statement made by the royal family, anywwhere, that says Harry and Meghan cannot use their titles for commercial gain. I'd be interested also, in the opposite of that - ie the list if activities for which the use of their titles is OK. So many random people seem to think they know when it is and is not okay, but show me a page in Debretts, or a news release on the royal website or a news report in which a formal statement has been made. Please. I'll happily chnage my view if that's the case.

I would say the statement "have made clear that everything they do will continue to uphold the values of Her Majesty" could be interpreted as them not using their royal titles for commercial ventures, but I agree that it is not explicit.

Also, there is nothing in the statement about them 'agreeing' not to use HRH. It is simply said that they 'will not' use it. I doubt they were given a choice, because if they had been, they'd be splashing that HRH all over their doormats and squigly handwritten notes.

MrsLeonFarrell · 24/03/2025 17:29

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 17:26

In Megs world it’s a big difference. Why…because even she realises what a comedown that is. Royal Duchess…..to influencer. No different to any other reality tv star who now hawks stuff on insta.

That's true. But to call yourself a founder I believe you need to actually found something. At the moment she is just getting commission, unless As Ever has products?

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 17:30

MrsLeonFarrell · 24/03/2025 17:27

Yes it was pretty obvious from the moment they left that at some point they would be moving into the commercial field. You simply can't make large sums of money wandering around foreign countries shaking hands.

In some ways I admire Meghan's grit. She keeps going, doesn't get discouraged by failure and tried lots of things to make money.

Harry in contrast is useless, unless you count the money he gets for doing whatever it is be does at Better up.

If she dropped the title and just used Meghan, fair enough.

Also agree with Harry being useless. He can’t be relied upon to bring in the money they need for their lavish lifestyle.

OP posts:
jeffgoldblum · 24/03/2025 17:30

MattCauthon · 24/03/2025 17:09

Nope. completely untrue.

They agreed not to use their HRH titles. Even those werent actually taken away.

And at no point have they ever been told they can't use their titles for commercial purposes.

YOu don't seem to understand how nobility and titles work. These are titles. They are, to aristocrats, no different to you being Ms or Dr or Professor or Captain. They are part of their name. No one would question their decision to use them.

Now, it might well be that the royal family here in England role their eyes at Meghan and Harry and their "grubby" commercial activities. I don't know. I don't care. Because at the end of the day, they are not working royals, they don't represent the royals and they have every right to use their titles.

Just like Lady so and so can use hers. Or "The Right Honorable" whatshisface can use his. Or the Earl of Wherever or the Marchiness of WhoCares.

This is completely wrong.

Spectre8 · 24/03/2025 17:30

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:55

Interesting @IcedPurple

Shes even put up a dress called ‘Windsor’ …I mean she is hawking the royal link shamelessly.

The RF need to step in.

Edited

How? She didn't decide to call the dress Windsor. It's actually a nice dress, so not surprising she included it. What is she meant to do avoid any word related to royal.🙄

IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 17:31

YourLuckyPearlGoose · 24/03/2025 17:28

Not an influencer? 2.6m followers on Instagram, the Daily Mail follows her every move and a new series on Netflix and people love to talk about her (this thread is a case in point).

Meghan’s hot commercial property for a brand partnership. I don’t particularly like her, but they get no money from the civil list or royal family and have to make their own way like the rest of us.

Who cares if she’s flogging dresses now?

Sorry, but those are not impressive follower numbers for someone of her fame. The big names have followers in the tens or hundreds of millions. Low single digit numbers is piddling, not a 'hot commercial property' at all.

And being gossiped about does not automatically translate to sales, as has been shown many times.

MrsLeonFarrell · 24/03/2025 17:32

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 17:30

If she dropped the title and just used Meghan, fair enough.

Also agree with Harry being useless. He can’t be relied upon to bring in the money they need for their lavish lifestyle.

Dropping the title would benefit them, well I think so at least but what do I know? It's definitely not something they seem to willing to do at the moment.

Noperope · 24/03/2025 17:32

So what? Charles had his Duchy brand. I'm not knowledgeable on the laws/etiquette behind royal titles and selling but why can't she sell overpriced crap like the rest of them?

blessingindisguise22 · 24/03/2025 17:32

Desperate times for her 😁

IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 17:33

BigWillyLittleTodger · 24/03/2025 17:28

This stumbling across these threads whilst making the tea does seem a fan favourite of late, I’m worried they burn said dinner whilst writing lengthy posts defending someone they apparently have no interest in.

They don't follow the royals, they don't care about Meghan one way or the other, they just came across this thread while shelling peas, and of course they 'hate bullying' and just want to understand why posters spend so much time talking about a person they don't know.

Have I missed anything out?

Hortus · 24/03/2025 17:34

MattCauthon · 24/03/2025 16:55

I'm struggling to see the issue. this is a pretty normal commercial process. There is no reason that Meghan cannot do normal commercial things. Just like whats his face and his milk adverts in Asia or Zara and her various bits and pieces. What is the issue here?

Because she is using her royal title for commercial gain, after both her and her husband have publicly slagged off the very family that gave her that title, and which my understanding was that under their agreement with the late Queen they would not do.
Peter Phillips and Zara Tindall never had royal titles and much more importantly they have never ever said anything negative about the royal family whatsoever. Also they were much less blatant.
If she had called it the Meghan Markle collection or Meghan Sussex it would have been better.
I somehow doubt the King gave his prior approval for this venture.

MrsLeonFarrell · 24/03/2025 17:34

Noperope · 24/03/2025 17:32

So what? Charles had his Duchy brand. I'm not knowledgeable on the laws/etiquette behind royal titles and selling but why can't she sell overpriced crap like the rest of them?

The Duchy brand is no longer owned by Charles.

Profits of stuff sold at Highgrove is donated to charity.

Penko25 · 24/03/2025 17:35

It’s all just so trashy. Where will it end?

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 17:36

Noperope · 24/03/2025 17:32

So what? Charles had his Duchy brand. I'm not knowledgeable on the laws/etiquette behind royal titles and selling but why can't she sell overpriced crap like the rest of them?

Yes but he’s not on insta under KingCharleyOfficial with a link to his jam is he?

He owns the Duchy brand. He doesn’t use his title to advertise it.

OP posts:
verysmellyjelly · 24/03/2025 17:36

I’m surprised people are defending this. I don’t hate the woman or anything like that, but influencer type selling is a bit crass, and for a supposed royal to do it is just obviously Not the Thing. I would think you’d have to be a massive fan of her to be on board with this? For clarity, I wouldn’t be in favour of anyone in the royal family doing this; it’s not some anti MM thing! I just think it’s inherently tacky.

If a nineteen year old on TikTok does it, then someone who has been a relatively senior royal definitely shouldn’t be doing the same thing. (That is, if there is any interest in retaining some dignity and gravitas, or proximity to the royal family.)

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 17:37

Penko25 · 24/03/2025 17:35

It’s all just so trashy. Where will it end?

Onlyfans?

OP posts:
IdaGlossop · 24/03/2025 17:37

jeffgoldblum · 24/03/2025 17:01

This is a complete example of what they were forbidden to do by the late queen!!!

The Royal family would look very petty indeed if they stepped in over a small % take from a dress by a third party that happens to be called Windsor. It's a convenient coincidence for MM but the dress is an example of the blah beige luxe look she has settled on (for now).

HumanRightsAreHumanRights · 24/03/2025 17:38

She's like the Del Boy of the Royal Family, but with less charm.

Wonder what she'll be selling out the back of her Monte Vista van next?

Avon perhaps?

BigWillyLittleTodger · 24/03/2025 17:40

Honestly they are a pair of planks, they should have followed Zara and Mike Tindalls lead, not accepted titles, not slagged the RF off, just started an exciting new life in California, they would have had the world at their feet, whilst still attending high profile royal family events, Meghan could easily have been brand ambassador like Zara for high end companies like Rolex or Cartier, they could have coined it in if they had not had so much spite, ego and hubris, now she’s just another influencer flogging tat for a bit of commission, don’t think it will keep the light on at Montecito Towers somehow.

OvaHere · 24/03/2025 17:41

I don't think it matters at this point. They've got to make a living somehow and previous ventures don't seem to be panning out.

I do think Meghan in her naivety about how the BRF works thought she would be able to financially trade on being royal from the day of the engagement.

Discovering the many limitations you have marrying into the main family I suspect was a big part of the push to go back to Cali. The American mindset about these sorts of things is vastly different.

Of course there will be ways in which you can financially benefit whilst being a royal but she won't have known the rules and the loopholes. Not being from that aristo world nobody will have told her and she didn't put in the years it would have taken to be thought of as an honorary one of them and therefore befitting of the inside track.

jeffgoldblum · 24/03/2025 17:41

Noperope · 24/03/2025 17:32

So what? Charles had his Duchy brand. I'm not knowledgeable on the laws/etiquette behind royal titles and selling but why can't she sell overpriced crap like the rest of them?

Charles doesn’t trouser the profit from the duchy brand .

jeffgoldblum · 24/03/2025 17:45

IdaGlossop · 24/03/2025 17:37

The Royal family would look very petty indeed if they stepped in over a small % take from a dress by a third party that happens to be called Windsor. It's a convenient coincidence for MM but the dress is an example of the blah beige luxe look she has settled on (for now).

To be honest I couldn’t give a monkeys about the dress or its name !
its using the titles to sell thats the issue, I thought I was clear!

IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 17:45

BigWillyLittleTodger · 24/03/2025 17:40

Honestly they are a pair of planks, they should have followed Zara and Mike Tindalls lead, not accepted titles, not slagged the RF off, just started an exciting new life in California, they would have had the world at their feet, whilst still attending high profile royal family events, Meghan could easily have been brand ambassador like Zara for high end companies like Rolex or Cartier, they could have coined it in if they had not had so much spite, ego and hubris, now she’s just another influencer flogging tat for a bit of commission, don’t think it will keep the light on at Montecito Towers somehow.

I always thought they should have done something like this from the start too. The 'titles' just make them look ridiculous but they seem to be obsessed with the status they think they bring. Harry has always been a prince and everyone calls her 'Meghan Markle' anyway, so why bother?

If they'd just capitalised on the huge goodwill they enjoyed 7 years ago, kept a home in England and attended family events, they'd be in a great position now, enjoying the best of all worlds. But peddling boring beige clothes on the internet is basically what she was doing before she ever met Harry. Talk about a come down.

Iwanttoliveonamountain · 24/03/2025 17:46

It’s pathetic the way people have so much hatred for that woman. Like she’s in the top ten of bad things that happen in the world

EsmaCannonball · 24/03/2025 17:47

It's bad enough that we have to pay for the royal family but there should be some kind of rule that if you hawk your royal, or formerly royal, status for personal profit then you have to pay back all the taxes that were spent on making you bankable. We want that wedding money back. It should never been down to the public to pay for a non-state occasion anyway.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread