Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.

1000 replies

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:22

Commissionable links- means when a potential customer clicks on the link, it's attributed to the affiliate, allowing the brand to record the source of the traffic. If someone buys a product using an affiliate link, the brand will pay the affiliate marketer commission on the sale

But she’s not an influencer?

This is really sad actually.

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.
OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
MrsLeonFarrell · 24/03/2025 17:47

BigWillyLittleTodger · 24/03/2025 17:40

Honestly they are a pair of planks, they should have followed Zara and Mike Tindalls lead, not accepted titles, not slagged the RF off, just started an exciting new life in California, they would have had the world at their feet, whilst still attending high profile royal family events, Meghan could easily have been brand ambassador like Zara for high end companies like Rolex or Cartier, they could have coined it in if they had not had so much spite, ego and hubris, now she’s just another influencer flogging tat for a bit of commission, don’t think it will keep the light on at Montecito Towers somehow.

Exactly. Mind you I think being a non working royal grandchild of the monarch is different from being a formerly working royal child of the monarch. But that's only true here, abroad I don't think people care about the details.

Onlyonekenobe · 24/03/2025 17:49

Well, she’s got what she wanted. Tackier and cheaper version than what she had in mind, but pretty sure this was the plan from that first date. She’s gone from someone who could have had a meaningful impact on people’s lives, to just another identikit California influencer - except with some of her dirty laundry already aired and an at best divisive reputation. Major ick. She’s brought her husband and her children down to her level. But then I suppose people are linked, not ranked, eh Duchess?

For me, it cheapens the value of her title, it’s closing potentially extremely advantageous and meaningful doors for her children (kind of feel sorry for Charles who’ll never have a meaningful relationship with these grandchildren - heinous of their parents), and indicates how done Harry is with the RF. If there were even a glimmer of desire from him to ever go back, this wouldn’t be happening. This is their life. Scrabbling Monetcito wannabes, schilling for dimes and dollars…and for what. Tawdry, ugly.

Over it. Wish them both the best, but there’s really nothing interesting or attractive about either of them. (Unless they sink to lower lows, of course).

glitterturd · 24/03/2025 17:50

It's an explosion of activity isn't it? Is this the work of her new PR ?

BigWillyLittleTodger · 24/03/2025 17:51

IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 17:33

They don't follow the royals, they don't care about Meghan one way or the other, they just came across this thread while shelling peas, and of course they 'hate bullying' and just want to understand why posters spend so much time talking about a person they don't know.

Have I missed anything out?

Edited

I think you have covered all bases!

Conundrumseverywhere · 24/03/2025 17:52

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:55

Interesting @IcedPurple

Shes even put up a dress called ‘Windsor’ …I mean she is hawking the royal link shamelessly.

The RF need to step in.

Edited

I see they appear to be the usual white and beige shapeless things she seems to favour above all else now.

SoNotaRealHousewife · 24/03/2025 17:52

We are one step away from QVC

IdaGlossop · 24/03/2025 17:53

jeffgoldblum · 24/03/2025 17:45

To be honest I couldn’t give a monkeys about the dress or its name !
its using the titles to sell thats the issue, I thought I was clear!

You were clear. I wasn't. There is a big difference between what she is doing here (a selection of other people's goods on a shared e-shopping platform using the Duchess of Sussex):with, say, launching a distinctive, high-end fashion brand called Drapery by the Duchess of Sussex. Of course she is doing what she was asked not to do but the scale of it is so small I doubt the Royal family and advisers would think it worth feathers flying to put a stop to it.

2Magpies24 · 24/03/2025 17:54

People are always asking how do I look so stylish? How do my children look so on trend, where did I get this amazing thing, that amazing thing. Now I can just say in my shop- STORE! (Amanda, Motherland)

andyouwillknowusbythetrailofdead · 24/03/2025 17:55

hopeishere · 24/03/2025 17:11

She’s definitely leading up to showing / monetising the kids. Given how vocal they have been about the evils of social media that’s a mistake IMHO. The kids can’t consent to being shown. I’m not surprised she’s add-linking stuff. It’s £££ as well (or at least the bits I looked at were). Does the vendor have to give permission to be included I wonder.

I wonder what Harry thinks of her using their children to help her flog tat. I don't think it's what he expected, even if many of us saw it coming a mile away.

Conundrumseverywhere · 24/03/2025 17:57

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 17:30

If she dropped the title and just used Meghan, fair enough.

Also agree with Harry being useless. He can’t be relied upon to bring in the money they need for their lavish lifestyle.

Well alll the millions are his. He has huge amounts of inherited wealth. I’m guessing he thinks that’s his contribution, so now he can play video games /juggle and smoke weed all day.

Vespanest · 24/03/2025 17:57

If she was converting negative interest into commercial wealth all of this wouldn't be so frantic and there would be no need to spend thousands on spin or the need to bring the children into the brand. I wanted ARO to be successful as she seemed to be more of "just" Meghan. The need of the Duchess of Sussex just doesn't fit. She wants to spin both sides and they are clashing, the I'm just the same as everyone else but insisting on being recognised as royalty. I actually think she may have got better engagement if she dropped the title, even been framed in her Oprah interview of how badly she's been treated as they "took my name" but now I've claimed it back.

IdaGlossop · 24/03/2025 17:58

andyouwillknowusbythetrailofdead · 24/03/2025 17:55

I wonder what Harry thinks of her using their children to help her flog tat. I don't think it's what he expected, even if many of us saw it coming a mile away.

Using your children on social media when they're so small doesn't sit at all well with the Show up, do good with parents whose offspring have suffered through online bullying.

HappySheldon · 24/03/2025 17:59

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 17:26

In Megs world it’s a big difference. Why…because even she realises what a comedown that is. Royal Duchess…..to influencer. No different to any other reality tv star who now hawks stuff on insta.

Lisa Rinna apparently does quite well on QVC.

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 17:59

She’s linking the cesta collection handbags on the site.

I rem a few months back, when she had the NYT article out promoting her investor links, and her power at selling out clothes that she wears:

“That’s one of the most powerful things that I’m able to do, and that’s simply wearing, like, an earring.”

Posters on here predicted that she would use ARO (now defunct) to sell a curated collection of this type of stuff, Inc the handbags, which she made sure to wear on her Colombia tour and get in the money shots of the bag.

So we werent correct that it would be the ARO (As ever) platform- that’s for her infomercials. But we were correct that her plan was to monetise/advertise the clothes that she wears and products she uses.

OP posts:
jeffgoldblum · 24/03/2025 17:59

And I will say for all these posters who keep bleating about Meghan hate , this rule is not only for Meghan but for all titled U.K. royals!
if Harry open up a shop selling things using his title “ the Duke of Sussex “ there would be “uproar” .
if Andrew popped onto sm and sold things using his title “ the Duke of York “ there would be “uproar”
this rule is for all of them .

the rule is there for a reason , because they are partially paid for by taxpayers they are not allowed to do this, and yes I am aware that the Sussex’s have stepped down but they still cost the taxpayers millions of pounds.

JSMill · 24/03/2025 18:00

To be fair to M, at least she’s trying to bring in some money. What on earth does Harry do with his time?

glitterturd · 24/03/2025 18:00

Hiccups again

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.
Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.
EsmaCannonball · 24/03/2025 18:05

andyouwillknowusbythetrailofdead · 24/03/2025 17:55

I wonder what Harry thinks of her using their children to help her flog tat. I don't think it's what he expected, even if many of us saw it coming a mile away.

Poor Harry. He can see pedal-bins talking to him when he is off his head on drugs but he wouldn't notice the Death Star if it was hovering over his utility room.

Flogging tat was always the plan. However, it was meant to go hand-in-hand with adoration for being a global philanthropist (not with your own money, of course) so no-one actually noticed you were just flogging tat.

HappySheldon · 24/03/2025 18:06

JSMill · 24/03/2025 18:00

To be fair to M, at least she’s trying to bring in some money. What on earth does Harry do with his time?

True point.

I'm no fan of MM. But she is married to a fairly lazy clueless man who is quite out of his depth and as someone else said upthread seems to expect money just for existing.

MM is grasping, but at least she has some damned energy about her.

IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 18:08

HappySheldon · 24/03/2025 18:06

True point.

I'm no fan of MM. But she is married to a fairly lazy clueless man who is quite out of his depth and as someone else said upthread seems to expect money just for existing.

MM is grasping, but at least she has some damned energy about her.

But what has she done over the past 5 years? Surely she should have used that time to build up this business?

And not to attribute any talent or work ethic to Harry, but 'Spare' is easily the biggest earner of their post royal life. And they bought that big house with his family money. The only reason she even got the NF show is because she married him. So he is still the 'draw' in this marriage.

HappySheldon · 24/03/2025 18:09

He's the ONLY draw. The title and the marriage is her only USP.

But she must be frustrated he is not as keen on monetising as she seems to be.

moveoveralice · 24/03/2025 18:13

jeffgoldblum · 24/03/2025 17:41

Charles doesn’t trouser the profit from the duchy brand .

But he trousers a lot more... We have all seen that C4 documentary surely?

I wander over here for the entertainment, which includes those who want to defend Meghan against all the 'haters'.

It is all a bit tawdry. That title and her choice to use it in these ways just looks ridiculous. I cannot imagine she is going to make a success of anything - given it is all such surface level stuff with her...

They could have achieved much more within the royal fold.

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 18:15

I think Harry buries his head with all this. He knows how embarrassing it is to have married an influencer.

I think meghan provides him with an easy life, cooks bacon for him every breakfast and allows him to laze about all day while she organises the running of the home/businesses. In return, he doesn’t say anything when she further lowers the bar in what she’s willing to do for money. Including using her title to tout for commission.

OP posts:
jeffgoldblum · 24/03/2025 18:16

IdaGlossop · 24/03/2025 17:53

You were clear. I wasn't. There is a big difference between what she is doing here (a selection of other people's goods on a shared e-shopping platform using the Duchess of Sussex):with, say, launching a distinctive, high-end fashion brand called Drapery by the Duchess of Sussex. Of course she is doing what she was asked not to do but the scale of it is so small I doubt the Royal family and advisers would think it worth feathers flying to put a stop to it.

I’ve just noticed that my reply to you was much sharper than I intended! Apologies for that.
I am one who found most of the goings on to be amusing, I don’t care if Meghan wants to flog dildos or sex toys , fair play make money for yourself.
but selling royal titles has always been a no .
not only has she cheapened her self and title but it has cheapened the the U.K. monarchy and the U.K. .

PigglyWigglyOhYeah · 24/03/2025 18:17

How tacky. As usual, no class whatsoever.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.