Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Is there another couple in the world like The Sussexes?

1000 replies

veraswaistcoat · 23/01/2025 10:54

I was musing last night about this aspect - they had the world at their feet. Despite what Sussex Supporters like to suggest most people in the UK nodded their heads " yes it was lovely Harry was getting married finally" . I had never heard of the bride myself as I don't watch American tv shows of that ilk. She was black or biracial? It didn't even enter my head what colour she was initially and then as coverage started it didn't make one iota of difference one way or the other. I recall the day of the wedding - it was sunny and the pubs were full of royal cheer broadcasting the wedding.

And then it all started to where we are today.

Are there any other couples in the world who have gone through such a downfall? Is this a feature of the social media arena today?
We see P Diddy and Blake Lively and others exposed now through SM.
You can't count the Duke and Duchess of Windsor in this category as they were always unpopular.

Can you think of any examples of people who have fallen so spectacularly?

I know people say " they live in California, they have money blah blah" but their reputation is one that most people would not want.

Is it purely because of their seeming complaining and sense of entitlement ? I mean you don't see the real philanthropists in this way - in fact you rarely hear about them and what they do.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
Spectre8 · 24/01/2025 14:43

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 14:34

I'm an ex journalists. The reason H&M get so much press is because the lovely Camilla has the Palace and press bods such as the Piers Morgan et al in her back pocket.

How else would a woman who helped her now husband groom a 19-year-old into a marriage to be a breeding machine while she was in bed with him at the same time become the fucking Queen of English against our dear departed utterly decent Queen Elizabeth II wishes.

Camilla's rehabilitate into the public's good books is nothing less than a feat of extravagance PR. Wo,ring for a tabloid involves nothing lees,than st stunt tiles around what you can and cannot say about these parasites.

We now see this co-conspirator in Dianas abuse call herself an advocate for abused women..amazing!

As for the like of Vanity Fair, who exactly do you think their sources are?

This is why I steer clear now and don't engage. Sometimes the takedown is so obvious the Blake Lively one was to me. Once you see the pattern you notice it again. People lift the lid and say it but many refuse to believe it actually happens because it's easier to think otherwise.

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 14:45

And if you think I'm illiterate you should see the state of the Daily Mail newsroom, there's barely a brain cell between them. You might fit in with your choice of hilarious gif.

NormaMajors1992coat · 24/01/2025 14:46

Hmm I wonder why the journalism career didn't work out 😂

Sorry @CeceliaImrie couldn't resist, but this does come across a bit 🤪

And you haven't responded to people correcting you about QE2's wish for Camilla to become queen?

Mylovelygreendress · 24/01/2025 14:48

NormaMajors1992coat · 24/01/2025 14:46

Hmm I wonder why the journalism career didn't work out 😂

Sorry @CeceliaImrie couldn't resist, but this does come across a bit 🤪

And you haven't responded to people correcting you about QE2's wish for Camilla to become queen?

Nor have you corrected your reference to Camilla as Queen of England.

jeffgoldblum · 24/01/2025 14:50

I think the phrase was " queen of English " @Mylovelygreendress , I'm assuming the poster just means that Camilla is an expert in the English language!

veraswaistcoat · 24/01/2025 14:50

@CeceliaImrie the last Queen of England was Elizabeth 1. Ex- history lecturer.

OP posts:
Spectre8 · 24/01/2025 14:52

NormaMajors1992coat · 24/01/2025 14:40

End of the day after seeing documentaries about social media, the recent stuff about PR companies deliberately targeting to bring someone down. Not to mention media needing to continually generate money and the use of clickbait articles. I just refuse to be sucked in to their agendas.

But you are here on social media talking about H+M and quoting press articles about them? So how are you refusing to get sucked in again?

Or do you think that H+M detractors = media dupes, H+M supporters = smart critical thinkers?

Because I don't know, there might be an argument that says H+M detractors = smart critical thinkers, H+M supporters = PR dupes.

I don't put people into boxes as so happens on here all the time. I don't get sucked into thinking about them in any particular way. If they go help and volunteer good for them or of they don't so I'm like so what? If they are photographed doing it ..and? So?

Have I talked about them? Or have I just looked at your comment about them and said well that's isn't true what was said isn't a fact and then said that to you.

pelargoniums · 24/01/2025 14:52

Mylovelygreendress · 24/01/2025 14:48

Nor have you corrected your reference to Camilla as Queen of England.

It might not be correct any more than Kate Middleton is correct, but your average person knows exactly who is meant by that. Honestly the worst part of royals threads is the nitpickery over titles: “Ooh, you said the Prince Lord High of Tampon when we all know it’s Prince The Lord High of Tampon, fool”. It’s all bollocks!

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 14:54

If we're now concentrating on the merits of my iPads autocorrect rather than the subject in hand I presume you've given up on your argument?

Of course she's not the fucking Queen of England, but that is how she presents to the rest of the world. I wonder how that happened..

Serenster · 24/01/2025 15:00

Of course she's not the fucking Queen of England, but that is how she presents to the rest of the world. I wonder how that happened..

She married the Prince of Wales and he became King. It’s how it usually happens…

NormaMajors1992coat · 24/01/2025 15:02

I don't put people into boxes as so happens on here all the time. I don't get sucked into thinking about them in any particular way...

Again I don't know what you're on at me for, who have I put in a box? I answered someone's question about whether MN would allow nasty threads about anyone else 🤷‍♀️

Have I talked about them? Or have I just looked at your comment about them and said well that's isn't true what was said isn't a fact and then said that to you.

I don't believe I brought up the "intimacy coordinators" 😂😂

And what I said is a fact is indeed a fact - for the third time, it's the fact that VF printed that story about the divorce book. That's a fact, right? They did print the story? I mean you copied and pasted it yourself.

Whatever, you don't seem able to understand what I'm saying so not much point continuing, but hey you're definitely the only Smart One who is Not Falling For It, so well done you 👍

NormaMajors1992coat · 24/01/2025 15:04

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 14:54

If we're now concentrating on the merits of my iPads autocorrect rather than the subject in hand I presume you've given up on your argument?

Of course she's not the fucking Queen of England, but that is how she presents to the rest of the world. I wonder how that happened..

Hey though, what about the QE2 wanting Camilla to become queen thing?

LaMarschallin · 24/01/2025 15:05

CeceliaImrie

Of course she's not the fucking Queen of England, but that is how she presents to the rest of the world. I wonder how that happened..

Is it because some of the rest of the world are a bit ill-informed so don't realise she's actually Queen of the United Kingdom, not just England?

veraswaistcoat · 24/01/2025 15:07

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 14:54

If we're now concentrating on the merits of my iPads autocorrect rather than the subject in hand I presume you've given up on your argument?

Of course she's not the fucking Queen of England, but that is how she presents to the rest of the world. I wonder how that happened..

It's all well and good getting sweary but facts are facts and one fact is that we often see people who have no real knowledge about the UK and the RF coming on here with posts which demonstrate that. This tends to make any thinking person connect this to supporters who are fed things by others about the Sussex situation. I'm not saying you ARE one of these people but it is important to use correct terminology when making a point if you wish to be taken seriously.

OP posts:
CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 15:09

NormaMajors1992coat · 24/01/2025 14:46

Hmm I wonder why the journalism career didn't work out 😂

Sorry @CeceliaImrie couldn't resist, but this does come across a bit 🤪

And you haven't responded to people correcting you about QE2's wish for Camilla to become queen?

That career didn't work out because I didn't wish to work for an organisation which is as corrupt and morally bankrupt as your beloved Royals.

Spectre8 · 24/01/2025 15:10

veraswaistcoat · 24/01/2025 15:07

It's all well and good getting sweary but facts are facts and one fact is that we often see people who have no real knowledge about the UK and the RF coming on here with posts which demonstrate that. This tends to make any thinking person connect this to supporters who are fed things by others about the Sussex situation. I'm not saying you ARE one of these people but it is important to use correct terminology when making a point if you wish to be taken seriously.

Or you just think it's someone who doesn't understand the monarchy and not automatically a Sussex supporter. Otherwise we can connect any criticism you make of H&M to mean your a hater, you dont like them.

NormaMajors1992coat · 24/01/2025 15:11

That career didn't work out because I didn't wish to work for an organisation which is as corrupt and morally bankrupt as your beloved Royals.

What makes you think I love the royals?

Are you ever going to correct the thing about QE2 wanting Camilla to become queen?

veraswaistcoat · 24/01/2025 15:11

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 14:45

And if you think I'm illiterate you should see the state of the Daily Mail newsroom, there's barely a brain cell between them. You might fit in with your choice of hilarious gif.

It wasn't a gif.

OP posts:
jeffgoldblum · 24/01/2025 15:14

I believe @veraswaistcoat , was simply pointing out that if you are coming onto a thread with a made up conspiracy theory and claiming inside information due to a past job , then you will be more likely to get posters to believe if you get your basic facts correct.

Another poster made a comment about fake pregnancy claiming inside information, that didn't fly either.

veraswaistcoat · 24/01/2025 15:17

"
Or you just think it's someone who doesn't understand the monarchy and not automatically a Sussex supporter. Otherwise we can connect any criticism you make of H&M to mean you're a hater, you dont like them."

@Spectre8 those two sentences are not logically connected in any way.

The first point is about someone using wrong BASIC terminology about the British Royal Family. To equate that to the Sussexes I would have to say something like " Dutchess Markle" or " Princess Rachel" which I haven't.

OP posts:
JaninaDuszejko · 24/01/2025 15:22

Chuchoter · 23/01/2025 15:47

Macbeth and Lady Macbeth.

The version of Macbeth that most English people know is Shakespeares which is pure propaganda (James was a descendant of Duncan, not Macbeth). Macbeth was King of Scotland for 17 years, and he was successful and popular.

So you are disparaging Macbeth by comparing him to Harry.

Herewegoagain29 · 24/01/2025 15:26

I think it was the major changes in narrative and U turns that kept happening with their story.
The marriage was initially a huge success but I think that the culture shock for Megan when confronted with living with aristocratic Brits was too much, and they left for Canada to seek 'a quiet life'. I think that if this was the end of the story it would have been ok with everyone.

The move to California and the Harry book, Oprah interview and endless plans to become celebs was their downfall. Megan in the wake of 'Black lives Matter' movement accused the Queen's relative of being racist and was taken seriously for 5 minuets until everyone realised how fake, vapid and pretentious she was.

Mylovelygreendress · 24/01/2025 15:42

LaMarschallin · 24/01/2025 15:05

CeceliaImrie

Of course she's not the fucking Queen of England, but that is how she presents to the rest of the world. I wonder how that happened..

Is it because some of the rest of the world are a bit ill-informed so don't realise she's actually Queen of the United Kingdom, not just England?

Thank you . I find it so dismissive and disrespectful to read “ you know who I mean .”
I am Scottish . Charles and Camilla are King and Queen of Scotland too . Pretty sure many people in Wales etc feel the same way.
There is a big wide world beyond the English border .
Any journalist should know that .

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 15:51

DappledThings · 24/01/2025 14:39

against our dear departed utterly decent Queen Elizabeth II wishes
Rubbish. It was clearly stated it was absolutely her wish.

Queen Consort yes. Queen, no.

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 24/01/2025 15:52

‘Half ‘in, half-out running commercial enterprises ie the Duchies each generating a £20 annual income’

It would seem hardly worth the effort, tbh. £20 won’t buy you much.

The reason that some of us ‘care’ about Harry and Meghan is that in the event of William and his children dying, they would be the direct successors to the current monarchs. Would they take the position? Given their expressed contempt for The United Kingdom and it’s people? What do you think….🤔

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.