Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Is there another couple in the world like The Sussexes?

1000 replies

veraswaistcoat · 23/01/2025 10:54

I was musing last night about this aspect - they had the world at their feet. Despite what Sussex Supporters like to suggest most people in the UK nodded their heads " yes it was lovely Harry was getting married finally" . I had never heard of the bride myself as I don't watch American tv shows of that ilk. She was black or biracial? It didn't even enter my head what colour she was initially and then as coverage started it didn't make one iota of difference one way or the other. I recall the day of the wedding - it was sunny and the pubs were full of royal cheer broadcasting the wedding.

And then it all started to where we are today.

Are there any other couples in the world who have gone through such a downfall? Is this a feature of the social media arena today?
We see P Diddy and Blake Lively and others exposed now through SM.
You can't count the Duke and Duchess of Windsor in this category as they were always unpopular.

Can you think of any examples of people who have fallen so spectacularly?

I know people say " they live in California, they have money blah blah" but their reputation is one that most people would not want.

Is it purely because of their seeming complaining and sense of entitlement ? I mean you don't see the real philanthropists in this way - in fact you rarely hear about them and what they do.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
Serenster · 24/01/2025 22:53

Here’s what you said, CeciliaImrie:

I'm an ex journalists. The reason H&M get so much press is because the lovely Camilla has the Palace and press bods such as the Piers Morgan et al in her back pocket

If you were a journalist 17 years ago (so, in 2008) how on earth do you know what has been going on behind the scenes to lead to bad press for Harry and Meghan? They have only been together for the last seven years.

MrsFinkelstein · 24/01/2025 22:56

CurlewKate · 24/01/2025 22:32

@MrsFinkelstein "
Oh hi Kate, lovely to see you posting again 😊

Can you please clarify what you meant on this post from a few nights ago?"
Happy to-although I thought it was not considered "the done thing" to reference other threads.
I see no reason to doubt that the PofW has been receiving treatment for some form of cancer.. However, there has been a lack of clarity-she has had preventative treatment, she is cancer free, she is in remission...Obviously she has a perfect right to share whatever she wants to-or to share nothing at all. I was just wondering whether that freedom would have been granted to others. That's all.

Thanks for the response.

Here are all the statements Catherine has made since her cancer diagnosis, what part of it do you feel needs clarifying?

It seems pretty clear to me, though I do concede certain media outlets have been prone to not reporting accurately, though that would be something you would need to take up with them.

I can't see anything complicated in what the Wales' have been saying.

Is there another couple in the world like The Sussexes?
Is there another couple in the world like The Sussexes?
Is there another couple in the world like The Sussexes?
Is there another couple in the world like The Sussexes?
Is there another couple in the world like The Sussexes?
CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 22:58

how on earth do you know what has been going on behind the scenes to lead to bad press for Harry and Meghan? They have only been together for the last seven years...

Is that a serious question?

I don't hate Meghan Markle or Prince Harry.

I'm trying to understand your anger but it's not easy.

Serenster · 24/01/2025 23:01

I’m not remotely angry. There just seems to be a big logical flaw in the reason you gave us for knowing what goes on behind the scenes.

So I’ve asked you about it, and got silly accusations straight back.

BemusedAmerican · 24/01/2025 23:05

Rummly · 24/01/2025 14:20

As you’re a resident of NYC, can I ask your view on the likelihood of the couple’s supposed two-hour high-speed car pursuit through New York?

Whenever I’ve visited it seems to be so clogged that I’m amazed anyone ever gets into second gear, let alone manages a French Connection-style car chase.

Midtown is like a giant parking lot. Tour buses and tourists posing for selfies, while delivery people on evokes in the street and on the sidewalk, cyclists, MTA buses all crowd the space. Crossing the street as a pedestrian is a nightmare since you ate stuck in a huge mass of slow humanity. We also have cameras that ticket speeders and blocking the box (the intersection). If you look at the video of Adams when he hears about it, he's trying, in my opinion, not to laugh.

aprayeratatime · 24/01/2025 23:09

he married an older woman who is a divorcee and from hollywood, with a shady past. What possibly could go wrong

aprayeratatime · 24/01/2025 23:09

apparently slapping older women's bottoms is his hobby

smilesy · 24/01/2025 23:10

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 22:44

@smilesy I am surprised that an ex journalist would t understand this 🤷‍♀️

Why?

Because I would have thought that an understanding of how the Head of State of the UK (not England) operates would be useful to a journalist. Particularly as you seem keen to comment on the Royals. I would have thought you might want to inform yourself properly

typos

Baital · 24/01/2025 23:14

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 22:58

how on earth do you know what has been going on behind the scenes to lead to bad press for Harry and Meghan? They have only been together for the last seven years...

Is that a serious question?

I don't hate Meghan Markle or Prince Harry.

I'm trying to understand your anger but it's not easy.

You claimed inside knowledge as an 'ex-journalist'. I think it is valid to question that claim. You have now admitted it was 17 years ago, so not current.

But also, there are many journalists - the majority of the profession? - who have no idea about the RF and their contacts. How do you get that knowledge?

That's putting aside the issue of random commentators on SM claiming to be their fantasy figures. I am a famous Hollywood actress, but won't give my name as I want to protect my privacy... but I can confirm that Meghan is auditioning for a high profile role, because we have the same agent...

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 23:27

You claimed inside knowledge as an 'ex-journalist'

When?

What are you so obsessed with me?

Apigcalledsue · 25/01/2025 00:01

They can’t stand playing second fiddle
so got loads of positive attention dating, marriage,baby
then the media diverted attention back to kate and Meghan realised she was relegated
at that point toys out of pram

Rummly · 25/01/2025 00:54

BemusedAmerican · 24/01/2025 23:05

Midtown is like a giant parking lot. Tour buses and tourists posing for selfies, while delivery people on evokes in the street and on the sidewalk, cyclists, MTA buses all crowd the space. Crossing the street as a pedestrian is a nightmare since you ate stuck in a huge mass of slow humanity. We also have cameras that ticket speeders and blocking the box (the intersection). If you look at the video of Adams when he hears about it, he's trying, in my opinion, not to laugh.

Thank you.

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 25/01/2025 01:51

Onlystayingforhalfanhour543 · 24/01/2025 13:34

And Charles and William aren't half-in, half-out running commercial enterprises ie the Duchies each generating a £20 annual income? And with special tax breaks!

But that’s ok I suppose because it is couched in acceptable terms and hidden behind a wall of smoke.

I think people are focusing on the wrong things entirely!

What are H&M doing in comparison that’s so wrong? I genuinely don’t get it.

And of course op the tabloids were generating hideous stuff about H & M because of the court case! That was pointed out way back in this thread or another. That’s why I think we need to be so cautious about which stories we give credence to and repeat on here.

They're not touting themselves to the highest bidder are they?!!

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 25/01/2025 01:54

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 13:05

Are you saying you have no opinion of anyone who has no effect on your life then ? That's a heck of a load of people !

Why would you?

Oh come off it, of course people have a view on those in the public eye!! Disingenuous to suggest that's not the case!

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 25/01/2025 01:57

Spectre8 · 24/01/2025 13:36

It's just you pop up to say how people make nasty comments on here about Kate but never seen you say the say about Meghan. I mean here is someone being nasty abojt megahns pregnancy..yet you haven't commented to say how nasty it is to do that about her. So I'm just wondering why you feel the need to point it out abojt one wamn but not another?

Probably for the same reason you continually defend Meghan but I am pretty sure I have never seen you do the same with Catherine.

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 25/01/2025 01:58

Spectre8 · 24/01/2025 13:45

@NormaMajors1992coat

Here is what the VF article wrote: Peele says that the unidentified person allegedly acting for Meghan made it clear that the couple were not getting divorced, but was seeking to know, if such a divorce did happen, “would this publisher theoretically be interested in a book that took place in its aftermath?”

So a person not identified allegedly claims. So it's not a fact, it's not been verified to be true. It's basically a rumour.

And furthermore not even a book ready to flogged, not even they are grtfing divorced. But IF they did would a book be of interest. That's the alleged claim.

It's so tenuous, it's just basically gossip and speculation and based on nothing. It's not even verified!

I assume they will sue, in that case.

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 25/01/2025 02:05

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 14:34

I'm an ex journalists. The reason H&M get so much press is because the lovely Camilla has the Palace and press bods such as the Piers Morgan et al in her back pocket.

How else would a woman who helped her now husband groom a 19-year-old into a marriage to be a breeding machine while she was in bed with him at the same time become the fucking Queen of English against our dear departed utterly decent Queen Elizabeth II wishes.

Camilla's rehabilitate into the public's good books is nothing less than a feat of extravagance PR. Wo,ring for a tabloid involves nothing lees,than st stunt tiles around what you can and cannot say about these parasites.

We now see this co-conspirator in Dianas abuse call herself an advocate for abused women..amazing!

As for the like of Vanity Fair, who exactly do you think their sources are?

Well you're hardly a master of your craft if you don't know that the late Queen endorsed Camilla being crowned Queen Consort a few months before her death.

What evidence do you have that Camilla had any part in the selection of Diana to be Charles's wife?

What a crock!

RogueFemale · 25/01/2025 02:06

@SooooHungry Even Fergie and Andrew have never taken the piss out of the queen or trashed the royal family publicly in quite the same way.

I think that's a questionable assertion. I agree, perhaps that the worst Fergie did was the toe-sucking incident, but Andrew's conduct has shamed his family far more than Harry.

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 25/01/2025 02:07

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 14:41

OP, updated for you. I'm an ex journalist.

The reason H&M get so much press is because the lovely Camilla has the Palace and press bods such as Piers Morgan et al in her back pocket.

How else would a woman who helped her now husband groom a 19-year-old into a marriage to be a breeding machine whilst she was in bed with him at the same time become the fucking Queen of England against our dear departed and utterly decent Queen Elizabeth II wishes.

Camilla's rehabilitation into the public's good books is nothing less than a feat of extravagant PR. Working for a tabloid and most broadsheets involves strict confinements around what you can and cannot say about these parasites.

We now see this co-conspirator in Dianas abuse call herself an advocate for abused women..amazing!

As for the like of Vanity Fair, who exactly do you think their sources are?

Nope, still nonsense!! You need better sources! 😂

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 25/01/2025 02:09

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 14:45

And if you think I'm illiterate you should see the state of the Daily Mail newsroom, there's barely a brain cell between them. You might fit in with your choice of hilarious gif.

You worked there then?

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 25/01/2025 02:12

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 15:09

That career didn't work out because I didn't wish to work for an organisation which is as corrupt and morally bankrupt as your beloved Royals.

How noble.

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 25/01/2025 02:15

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 15:51

Queen Consort yes. Queen, no.

Jesus, a bit like Meghan and Harry, you don't have a close relationship with facts do you?

I have news for you. All Queens, unless reigning in their own right like the late QE2, are Queen Consorts.

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 25/01/2025 02:18

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 17:05

@pilates

Ex journalist, was written very clearly.

I'm not convinced you can read proficiently.

Fuck me, the irony!!

RogueFemale · 25/01/2025 02:25

CeceliaImrie · 24/01/2025 14:41

OP, updated for you. I'm an ex journalist.

The reason H&M get so much press is because the lovely Camilla has the Palace and press bods such as Piers Morgan et al in her back pocket.

How else would a woman who helped her now husband groom a 19-year-old into a marriage to be a breeding machine whilst she was in bed with him at the same time become the fucking Queen of England against our dear departed and utterly decent Queen Elizabeth II wishes.

Camilla's rehabilitation into the public's good books is nothing less than a feat of extravagant PR. Working for a tabloid and most broadsheets involves strict confinements around what you can and cannot say about these parasites.

We now see this co-conspirator in Dianas abuse call herself an advocate for abused women..amazing!

As for the like of Vanity Fair, who exactly do you think their sources are?

I agree @CeceliaImrie and I'm no fan of Camilla the Tampon Queen nor Charles who fucked over Diana Spencer.

Extiainoiapeial · 25/01/2025 02:26

RogueFemale · 25/01/2025 02:25

I agree @CeceliaImrie and I'm no fan of Camilla the Tampon Queen nor Charles who fucked over Diana Spencer.

Ditto. I agree also.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.