Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry and Meghans children

228 replies

Willowgirls · 21/10/2024 22:22

I keep reading that Archie and lilibet are not real.
Photos are of other peoples children.
But surely the press would know the truth.
I'm sure they will have seen them being taken to school/nursery
even if they didn't take pictures or is it just the nanny taking them.
That was one of the arguments of leaving they would never be able to
take them to school yet William and Catherine can do school drop off
with no publicity unless they announce it. (First day of term)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Thedom · 23/10/2024 12:15

Rhaidimiddim · 23/10/2024 11:31

If u check the text against his entry, it was written before he was married i. e. old copy, repurposed.

LOL it's from 8 years ago, and this is the photo they used 8 years ago, thats a hard push to rate him. Harpers Bazaar are really scraping the barrel there in their quest to keep H&M onside.

Harry and Meghans children
x2boys · 23/10/2024 12:15

I keep seeing this nonsense on Facebook, if they were not real why would the late Queen and the now king charges go to Archies baptism, were they involved in the conspiracy?

x2boys · 23/10/2024 12:25

x2boys · 23/10/2024 12:15

I keep seeing this nonsense on Facebook, if they were not real why would the late Queen and the now king charges go to Archies baptism, were they involved in the conspiracy?

King Charles*

Mylovelygreendress · 23/10/2024 12:32

x2boys · 23/10/2024 12:25

King Charles*

The late Queen and PP did not attend the christening .

x2boys · 23/10/2024 13:00

Mylovelygreendress · 23/10/2024 12:32

The late Queen and PP did not attend the christening .

OK fair enough, but Charles and Camilla ,and William and Kate did so I assume they beleive that Archie exists.

Mylovelygreendress · 23/10/2024 13:27

I certainly think the children exist .

PinkTonic · 23/10/2024 13:48

MrsLeonFarrell · 22/10/2024 13:10

I do think that older celebrity mums would do everybody a favour if they were honest about the fact that pregnancy over a certain age usually involved a donor egg. I have never seen evidence that people weren't pregnant when they claimed to though.

I can think of one famous woman married to a very famous actor who was supposed to be late third trimester with twins photographed in tight jeans and a chunky sweater not obviously pregnant. It wasn’t feasible, however slim and fit she was.

Uricon2 · 23/10/2024 16:17

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 23/10/2024 09:02

If anyone is interested this is who those people think is Lili’s actor 🤣

I mean I can see a bit of a resemblance but not enough to convince me it’s the same kid. Also, why would Stassi Schroeder hire her kid out to them when she is fairly high profile herself? It doesn’t make sense!

The child on the right is the double of my brother at the same age 😂!

I've only just seen this but have to say all the rumours about Archie and Lili not existing are deranged, always thought so and TBH haven't seen any of the board regulars give them a jot of credence. It is entirely up to M&H if they want to make pictures of them public and even if it is being fuelled by distrust of the media, I think it might be the best course.

The weirdness around the birth announcement all seemed a bit unneeded, but perhaps Harry was still coming down from his consumption of gas and air.

skullbabe · 23/10/2024 17:15

Samcro · 23/10/2024 11:38

did the op ever come back?

You see it too 🤣

theemptinessmachine · 23/10/2024 18:04

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 23/10/2024 09:02

If anyone is interested this is who those people think is Lili’s actor 🤣

I mean I can see a bit of a resemblance but not enough to convince me it’s the same kid. Also, why would Stassi Schroeder hire her kid out to them when she is fairly high profile herself? It doesn’t make sense!

Maybe Stassi was an egg donor 🤷‍♀️

LaMarschallin · 23/10/2024 18:23

smilesy · 22/10/2024 19:38

Just catching up and I can’t believe people are still coming out with the absolute bollocks that their children are not real. Do they think the late Queen would participate in some sort of elaborate conspiracy to cover up “fake” children?🙄 Or the king or the rest of the Royal Family. Not to mention the Markle family whom would presumably not be the slightest bit bothered by exposing a story like that

eta I don’t usually bother with these threads I. The hope that they will die a death, but given that this one unfortunately doesn’t seem
to be 🤷‍♀️

Edited

Also catching up.
Totally agree with smilesy. I remember many people, including me, posting on a similar thread to say they'd never read such bollocky bollocks.
However, it's going to get tedious if these mad threads about H&M's children keep appearing, followed by comments implying that if people don't rush in to say it's obviously bollocky bollocks every time, then they're haterz who believe the rumours.
Maybe there should be a thread where everyone who doesn't believe these mad ideas about the children signs up to say so and doesn't feel they have to do it every bloody time it's mentioned here.
(No, I can't be arsed to start one)

Spectre8 · 23/10/2024 18:29

Lol it's the very behaviour we see on W&K threads, funny how when it's played back you seem to be irked by it enough to comment about it. Never see those type of comments coming back at you when you dish it out. 🤪

Toseland · 23/10/2024 18:33

Another thought... there are no children because how would you explain to them when they were older that they could have known the Queen and gone to the King's Coronation?! Unless you really, really hated Royalty perhaps?

BigWillyLittleTodger · 23/10/2024 19:20

LaMarschallin · 23/10/2024 18:23

Also catching up.
Totally agree with smilesy. I remember many people, including me, posting on a similar thread to say they'd never read such bollocky bollocks.
However, it's going to get tedious if these mad threads about H&M's children keep appearing, followed by comments implying that if people don't rush in to say it's obviously bollocky bollocks every time, then they're haterz who believe the rumours.
Maybe there should be a thread where everyone who doesn't believe these mad ideas about the children signs up to say so and doesn't feel they have to do it every bloody time it's mentioned here.
(No, I can't be arsed to start one)

It’s so tiresome isn’t it, the OP posted at 10.30 when most people are off to bed or already asleep then because some haven’t responded by 6.00 am because they have been asleep they must agree with the fact that Archie and Lily don’t exist 🙄 utterly ridiculous.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 23/10/2024 19:27

I am going to be presumptuous and post this on behalf of us regulars for the hard of thinking at the back.

Harry and Meghans children
BigWillyLittleTodger · 23/10/2024 19:28

And just to hammer the point home.

Harry and Meghans children
RitaIncognita · 23/10/2024 19:42

BigWillyLittleTodger · 23/10/2024 19:20

It’s so tiresome isn’t it, the OP posted at 10.30 when most people are off to bed or already asleep then because some haven’t responded by 6.00 am because they have been asleep they must agree with the fact that Archie and Lily don’t exist 🙄 utterly ridiculous.

MNHQ should take these sorts of threads down.

Willowgirls · 23/10/2024 19:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

IsoldeWagner · 23/10/2024 19:58

"I thought the press would know the truth"
Firstly, there is no such thing as "the press". News outlets vary, and are by no means a hive mind. They have different owners, and different readership.
Secondly, no reputable news organisation would publish such utter nonsense. This sounds like the codswallop from tiktok or twitter x or some such - hardly a good source for any information which can be verified.

Snorlaxo · 23/10/2024 20:06

I’ve only seen randoms on social media say this.

The media isn’t one mass opinion. They range from the critical for clickbait and attention to those who will print compliments for the right price.

Spectre8 · 23/10/2024 20:55

BigWillyLittleTodger · 23/10/2024 19:20

It’s so tiresome isn’t it, the OP posted at 10.30 when most people are off to bed or already asleep then because some haven’t responded by 6.00 am because they have been asleep they must agree with the fact that Archie and Lily don’t exist 🙄 utterly ridiculous.

Lol but you don't find it tiresome when the comments are about posters clocking on or off shift or posters who have disappeared or not had time to come back to respond. Oh no those are all okay because they are aimed at posters who won't speak negatively about them. And if an explanation is offered its then made a mockery of.

The hypocrisy by some has no limits here

MaturingCheeseball · 23/10/2024 21:08

It seems that you want people to speculate as to the existence of the children so you can gasp and suck your teeth in and say how dreadful all the “haterz” are.

Yes, there are some oddballs on the internet who believe all sorts of nonsense, some of it rather alarming. But MN royalty boards are quite restrained and although most of us are disparaging about H&M’s antics, you will have trouble finding a mad conspiracy theorist.

(That being said, it would be absolutely hilarious if A and L didn’t exist - what a story!!)

BigWillyLittleTodger · 23/10/2024 21:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

EffortlesslyInelegant · 23/10/2024 21:48

Samcro · 23/10/2024 11:38

did the op ever come back?

OP never intended to. It's a thing now and if you look it's everywhere!

Willowgirls · 23/10/2024 21:53

@EffortlesslyInelegant if you look carefully I did come back.
Unfortunately I couldn't return before as I was busy.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread