Harry and Meghans children

[Willowgirls]

I keep reading that Archie and lilibet are not real.
Photos are of other peoples children.
But surely the press would know the truth.
I'm sure they will have seen them being taken to school/nursery
even if they didn't take pictures or is it just the nanny taking them.
That was one of the arguments of leaving they would never be able to
take them to school yet William and Catherine can do school drop off
with no publicity unless they announce it. (First day of term)

Where exactly are you reading this?

Ive never seen this and i read utter trash

I don't subscribe to the wacky view that H & M's children don't exist. Gosh, I feel sorry for those youngsters, though.

Clearly Meghan had 'pregnancy face' (and looked lovely with it) after having Archie - you can't really fake that. But one thing does puzzle me...

Meghan goes on and on about herself and her experiences ad nauseam, but I've never read much - or anything, really - about her experience of pregnancy, only the silly birth stories from Harry.

Meghan is just the sort of self-obsessed woman to behave as though she's the first person to have a baby and write books, give interviews and advice etc, but she's strangely silent on the experience of pregnancy. Odd.

Whil I see you point there. If we are to believe Harry then Meghan was going through a bad mental health time during her pregnancies (it was around that time they started looking to leave) so there is a chance her pregnancies weere overshadowed by poor mental health and due to that not a time she wants to recall? Or may not even recall.

She has spoken of motherhood a bit but also less than I would have expected. I think it is a part of their wish to keep the children out of the limelight.

I'm not a H&M fan but would never subscribe to this nonsense.

H&M have bought all this speculation and mistrust on themselves, by acting in the way they have.
In the Royal family births are done in a particular way so that everyone can be absolutely sure that the child is in line to the throne.
There are a good number of oddities which have still not been settled. The worst of which is that Meghan allegedly had a hysterectomy in her 20s.

Plenty of regular posters on here, me inc.

I thought they had IVF in Canada as they went straight there after the wedding

Hi. 👋🏼
You need to re read, cos I can see most of "us".
But it's better to continue to play the victim isn't it?

What nonsense. Meghan was pregnant, she and Harry have two children.
Why on earth do people believe this absurdity?
If you dislike or mistrust them as a couple, at least base it on some sort of evidence.

I swear sometimes people have lost the capacity of critical thinking.
OP, start by looking at Prince Archie's christening photos.

😂

What is wrong with people???

It sounds like you believe this @Willowgirls ……..

Meghan and Harry had every right to choose where and how the birth took place. Imagine your husband's granny taking over and dictating how, where and the doc who assists at the birth if that thread appeared on here the answers would be different.

As for in line to the throne according to many there so far away from it they're not important anyway.

Meghan and Harry have many things to criticise them for but it's gone way beyond that.

What bollocks!

It started off as IVF rumours then progressed to surrogacy and moon bump conspiracy. And the worst believe that they are hired actors. The latter came up as some people believe that Lilibet bares a resemblance to the daughter of Stassi Schroeder and so they are convinced they hire her as a stand in.

I can believe IVF (although it would be none of our business if true) and at a push I could believe surrogacy (due to the secretive nature of Archie’s birth and the fact that to be in the line of succession you have to be born from heirs of the body so if true Archie would have no claim) but it’s still a very far reach. I think the conspiracy that they don’t exist and use actors is completely bat shit.

People who are convinced in these rumours believe it’s going to all be exposed with that upcoming German documentary that has been delayed to be checked and verified. It’s amazing how some people’s minds work.

I do believe it's possible they had IVF. They will have taken Meghan's age and the related stats into account and not want to leave anything to chance. If they had IVF with embryo selection then you know the baby is healthy and - if you go to canada/US as they did at the relevant times - then you can select the sex of the baby. Of course they would have selected a boy followed by a girl, long considered the traditional ideal.
Many will disagree but I think its very possible.

You need to be more selective in where you go on the Internet.

Most if not all news sites have an agenda. Not all 'news' is real. There are countries who wish harm to the western world. They interfere heavily in newsfeeds and put out misinformation and falsehoods. This causes unrest within populations (the US is a prime example of this, as indeed were the recent UK elections and subsequent rioting).

You also need to engage the little grey cells more and read everything with a critical eye.

I've seen this suggested on X a few times from American posters, and due to Meghan's claim during an interview that she had a hysterectomy in her 20's. I don't believe it though - it's too crazy. I think Harry is behind the lack of photos for their privacy.

So what if they did iVF, Sophie and Edward did IVF too, it's not such a big deal, even for the RF, and does not justify in any way the whole 'there are no kids' conspiracy theory.

Don't forget , the journalist who interviewed them for The Cut article, met the kids during the interview, and she didn't hold back on her view of Meghan, I think she would have mentioned if the kids were nowhere to be seen and would not have lied about meeting them.

Meghan did have a bizarre bump that appeared to go back and forth in size, and was often very oddly shaped - this has fed the fake bump theories. But I believe she wore various forms of shape wear throughout the pregnancy and that is what made it look so odd and unnatural. The videos of her bump bouncing up and down and swaying from side to side as she walked are strange and I can't explain them unless it's the shape wear effect again or someone has tampered with the video. Hard to believe anything now because of AI.

Also her bending down into a full squat, in high heels, with her knees locked together and staying that way for a minute before easily and seamlessly rising up again - at nine months pregnant - is quite an astonishing feat and she must be much more athletic than she looks.

I think the lack of photos is for a myriad of reasons, one of them being they want to keep the photos for a big $$ impact, like they did when they included photos and videos during the Netflix documentary.

The kids seem to look like the Markle side of the family, certainly the photo of Lilibeth released on her 1st birthday had a very strong resemblance to Meghans fathers side of the family, I don't think they want that comparison at all, I think that is emphasised even more when you hear Harry and Meghan discussing Lilibeths' looks.

Archie has a strong look of Thomas Markle.
I detect a lot of anxiety from H&M on Lili's looks. They seem desperate for her to be a blonde, blue eyed copy of Diana. Which is a very strange attitude to have. I think as a woman who clearly was not accepting of her natural good looks (nose job, possible other surgery, never had her natural hair since childhood) I think having a daughter must be a complicated thing psychologically. If your daughter then has the nose and hair you so disliked on yourself, how to feel about that? How to explain when she's older?

There are some odd inconsistencies like the physical birth announcement but I don’t think it means that the kids aren’t real.
Similarly the bending down with knees together and the strange attitudes about Lilibet’s looks that pp mentioned are weird but don’t mean that the kids don’t exist. Meghan looked like she’d just had a baby when Archie was presented to Queen Elizabeth in front of the cameras and I don’t think Harry is a good enough actor to fake the excitement he showed at becoming a father.
I assume that the people who say that the kids don’t exist have YouTube channels etc so want to be more extreme than the others for clickbait.

There are a number of Youtubers who believe it was a lifelike silicon doll, with a discreet hand pump to make its chest rise and fall to simulate breathing. I'm not saying I believe that, but a few things about the pregnancies and kids certainly don't add up.