Harry and Meghans children

[Willowgirls]

I keep reading that Archie and lilibet are not real.
Photos are of other peoples children.
But surely the press would know the truth.
I'm sure they will have seen them being taken to school/nursery
even if they didn't take pictures or is it just the nanny taking them.
That was one of the arguments of leaving they would never be able to
take them to school yet William and Catherine can do school drop off
with no publicity unless they announce it. (First day of term)

Well exactly this! I have never read this sort of nonsense and I'd imagine it's easy to avoid the unhinged areas of the internet where people believe rubbish.

😂😂😂 People are batshit!

I heard birds aren't real either 🤔

They're not real sure wasn't that what COVID was about their batteries needed changed 😂

People are utterly batshit though. This conspiracy theory is a long, long way down the road to compete tinfoil hatting.

I mean, how do they think it would eventually play out? People would notice the lack of children at some stage, I promise you….

A load of crap that's not even worth engaging with. But here I am engaging with it, if only to disprove the paranoid PP's opinion that H+M's critics all keep quiet about stuff like this and therefore their criticism can be dismissed as hate, frothing, derangement etc etc

No it isn’t! She was slightly younger than me when I got pregnant the first and then later the 3rd month of trying. Are you in your twenties and think that’s a geriatric pregnancy?!

For many women that’s not unusual at all.

She’s never said she had a hysterectomy. That's just another crazy conspiracy theory spread online.

I don't like Harry and Meghan’s behaviour but it’s awful that people spread these ridiculous rumours about their children. There's plenty of things to criticise about them without making stuff up.

The doll believers are some of the most frothy lunatics on the internet. The kind that call Meghan “delulu”, not that they call her Meghan when they can be oh-so witty and use MeGain or Meghoul. Complain about her work ethic but have time to make 17-minute YouTube videos “proving” the moonbump popped and inflated; 4,000-word Reddit posts (that they like to say are “fact-checked, sources below” then it’s links to equally batshit people) outlining why the Archie in a baby carrier Canadian woods papwalk is actually a doll and you can see the string (?). Lots of doing the Daily Mail red circle of shame on photographs, like the Queen’s face at the christening because she looks grumpy because she KNOWS they just christened a doll (even though the Queen 90% of the time looked like she’d just eaten a lemon).

It would be funny if it weren’t real people on the end of the vitriol (and I’m no particular Meghan stan, or anti-Meghan; I’m Meghan-neutral).

I agree with you (possibly for the first time) and am pleased to see the number of posts ridiculing the nasty rumour repeated by the OP. I think it can only be described as bat-shittery from the bottom-feeders of the internet.

But MNHQ seem happy to let this thread stand

I think they're just keeping them out of the media, things in the media about them tend to be either from them, or where the media pick up their ridiculous behaviour, so not really interested in their children, and suspect H wants their privacy like he had ... eventually, and M is probably waiting so she can monetise them in the future

If you are in the Royal family there are protocols to follow that have been in place for hundreds of years to stop any speculation - such as what is happening now. It's not to do with his granny dictating!

I can see some psychos conspiracy theorists have arrived on this thread already.

So pray tell, what is the truth? Do share what was so inconsistent about her pregnancy and what that means.

Of course the children are real . Although rarely seen , there have been photos and there is no way the LOS would include non existent children .

It may be worth clicking on some more level headed stuff on your socials for a while as your current clicking habits have trained the algorithm to serve up some batshit stuff to your timeline

They are probably lizards.

Thanks, I've only seen the claims from American posters, and I've no idea about how credible many of their publications are.

The rumours are completely unbelievable anyway, there's no way anyone with a public profile can fake having children.

A silicon doll? You can’t make this stuff up. What a load of manure.

@Spectre8 i hope you are satisfied that several regulars are denouncing this utter rubbish.

I've seen some clips where her bump moves / slips which makes it look really strange, however I'd suspect if there was some kind of fake bump it was more to do with her having a 'perfect pregnancy bump' rather than no baby

It's really not unusual.

But how do you know how long they were trying anyway? Who said they waited until they were married.

That is trumpian level craziness right there!!

I conceived at 37 after two months off the pill. The exact same amount of time it took when I was 23.

Protocols are changed and modernised. The Archbishop of Canterbury and half the government are no longer required to attend the birth. Absolutely not needed in the days of DNA. Birth should only ever be about the comfort and safety of the mother and baby.

It's the same as those who are still speculating that Charles in not Harry's father.

My point on the Queen dictating was in response to comments such as she shouldn't have let them marry, get married in Church, not let her wear white, what they call their children as a tiny amount of examples.

"If you are in the Royal family there are protocols to follow that have been in place for hundreds of years to stop any speculation - such as what is happening now"

Wasn't there a time when the Chancellor of the Exchequer or somine witnessed royal births?