Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghans trademark not allowed

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 03/09/2024 17:09

The patent office apparently has turned down the trademark of Meghans new jam making business American Riviera Orchard on the grounds that you can't trademark geographical locations. You would have thought somebody would have picked up on this before now.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
44
Thedom · 09/09/2024 09:20

Why do you need a microphone to talk to about 6 people in a book shop?

Past trauma where she never got the mic? y'know like Harry missing out on that extra sausage.

IsoldeWagner · 09/09/2024 09:22

Thedom · 09/09/2024 09:20

Why do you need a microphone to talk to about 6 people in a book shop?

Past trauma where she never got the mic? y'know like Harry missing out on that extra sausage.

😥

flapjackfairy · 09/09/2024 09:45

IsoldeWagner · 09/09/2024 05:59

More than 50 years ago, when I was a teenager, we were taught to practise joy and gratitude. (I went to a religious school). These are very old concepts, especially in the Christian lexicon. It's aim was to ensure that you didn't put yourself front and centre, and that you were considerate of others, your appreciated others, and stopped developing petty resentments.
It's not a bad approach.
However, you have to live it, not speak it.

Well said

Twistybranch · 09/09/2024 09:48

Thedom · 09/09/2024 08:53

Yes, it appears it was the opening of a bookstore. Meghan got the hard seat in the audience with the other attendees, Oprah got the VIP soft cushy chair. Although M did get a go with the mic, which kind of looks a bit pointless in a small room with 2 or 3 rows of seats.

It appears the bookstore is co-owned by a friend of Meghans' who was on her podcast and a board member of WME.

For once Meghan looks the best dressed, the audience and Oprah don't appear to have put in much effort at all.

Edited

All makes sense now

Rumshotsandrainshowers · 09/09/2024 10:19

Guarantee Oprahs eyes rolled so far back in her head she could see inside her own skull.

thecrossIambearing · 09/09/2024 10:26

CoffeandTiaMaria · 09/09/2024 07:45

I suspect that Meghan means the ‘joy and gratitude’ of her prescence that those around her experience when she’s near them 😵‍💫

😂😂

Thedom · 09/09/2024 10:47

Rumshotsandrainshowers · 09/09/2024 10:19

Guarantee Oprahs eyes rolled so far back in her head she could see inside her own skull.

I wonder if Oprah and Gayle are having a bit of a giggle about them behind their back, I get the sense they could be like that. 'Oh look, there they are off to grace Colombia with a tour, snort snort'. Oprah will never burn a bridge until it becomes totally untenable, I mean she continued to be friends with Weinstein, and publicly endorsed him multiple times, until she knew it was over for Weinstein.

MummyJ12 · 09/09/2024 11:11

Meghan wasn’t there due to an invite from Oprah, that’s for sure. She was there because WME had sorted it. As per. One of the board members, Jennifer Rudolf Walsh was there with her. She runs the literary, speakers and conferences division. They are working hard for Meghan’s dollar.

I agree, what a load of nonsense she comes out with! The outfit was cosplaying Diana again too.

MummyJ12 · 09/09/2024 11:20

As for the Beckhams, there’s no chance of Harry and Meghan getting anywhere near them. They have lived, learned and been burned by the Sussexes already. Including Victoria sending thousands of pounds worth of clothes to Meghan just to be accused of leaking stories to the press. As well as Harry snubbing David when he had made a special journey to support Invictus one time.
David has chosen his team and it’s not the Sussexes. He has his eyes on that knighthood, he wouldn’t risk upsetting the Royal Family.

MummyJ12 · 09/09/2024 11:27

Meant to tag @Thedom to elaborate on pp!

It appears the bookstore is co-owned by a friend of Meghans' who was on her podcast and a board member of WME.

Rumshotsandrainshowers · 09/09/2024 11:27

MummyJ12 · 09/09/2024 11:20

As for the Beckhams, there’s no chance of Harry and Meghan getting anywhere near them. They have lived, learned and been burned by the Sussexes already. Including Victoria sending thousands of pounds worth of clothes to Meghan just to be accused of leaking stories to the press. As well as Harry snubbing David when he had made a special journey to support Invictus one time.
David has chosen his team and it’s not the Sussexes. He has his eyes on that knighthood, he wouldn’t risk upsetting the Royal Family.

Actually I think David and Victoria are likely quite decent people. They are clearly very private.i think David would have continued to be friends with Harry and Megan had they behaved decently. Accusing Victoria of leaking is actually mind boggling. It shows you just how important Megan thinks she is. How superior. Even I know there is no way Victoria was sitting phoning the press. She’s prob one of the most discreet people out there.

however Harry and Megan making false accusations of people leaking about them isn’t something new. It’s really the corner stone of spare.

MummyJ12 · 09/09/2024 11:31

I didn’t say they weren’t decent people @Rumshotsandrainshowers.

Rumshotsandrainshowers · 09/09/2024 11:31

Thedom · 09/09/2024 10:47

I wonder if Oprah and Gayle are having a bit of a giggle about them behind their back, I get the sense they could be like that. 'Oh look, there they are off to grace Colombia with a tour, snort snort'. Oprah will never burn a bridge until it becomes totally untenable, I mean she continued to be friends with Weinstein, and publicly endorsed him multiple times, until she knew it was over for Weinstein.

Maybe some of that, but I get the impression Oprah lacks patience and can be quite cutting and judgey. I’d guess she feels nothing but disdain for them. Her face in the interview betrayed some of that. Megan would have fronted up seeing if she could get friendly with Oprah again. Of which there is zero chance.

oprah is 70 now, and she’s used to being in charge, taking no nonsense. She’s also good at reading people, after a lifetime of it. Oprah used Megan and Harry to get the interview, then kicked them to the curb.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 09/09/2024 11:43

I also dislike how this narrative is clearly staged and to gaslight everyone they’ve trodden on in both families. Oh, you’re sad with us? But we are all about joy and gratitude so it must be you that’s the problem you couldn’t possibly feel angry with us, you must be lacking joy and gratitude in your life

A very valid point, @EigerTheTiger, and something we often see from the few remaining fans with "they're living their best life so why should you care", etc.

However as said last night Meghan will doubtless move onto the next "thing" all too soon and this brief foray into lecturing others about joy will be forgotten like all the rest

Twistybranch · 09/09/2024 11:52

I’m guessing Victoria Jackson is the new Jessica Mulroney?

Same thing right.

Meghan, new to the area- befriends someone very rich who has extensive connections in that area and who takes meghan under their wing.

Jessica would ‘style’ Meghan and meghan has been wearing Victorias make up brand. She almost plays ‘dolly’ for them.

Then at some point, she moves on when she has what she needs or she feels they are damaging her brand

Abouttimeforanamechange · 09/09/2024 11:55

Oprah used Megan and Harry to get the interview, then kicked them to the curb.

They also blatantly used Oprah to launch a public attack on the RF, in which much of what they said was shown to be total bs. And Oprah's own production team screwed up in showing headlines from non-UK newsapers to illustrate the 'racist British media' allegations. Whole thing probably screwed any chance Oprah might have had of getting a serious interview with anyone royal-adjacent.

I don't have much sympathy, because a bit of due diligence might have warned her what she was getting into, but I don't blame her for being wary.

MummyJ12 · 09/09/2024 11:57

Actually I think David and Victoria are likely quite decent people. They are clearly very private.i think David would have continued to be friends with Harry and Megan had they behaved decently. Accusing Victoria of leaking is actually mind boggling. It shows you just how important Megan thinks she is. How superior. Even I know there is no way Victoria was sitting phoning the press. She’s prob one of the most discreet people out there.

however Harry and Megan making false accusations of people leaking about them isn’t something new. It’s really the corner stone of spare.

I can respond more thoroughly now!

Firstly, of course the Beckhams wouldn’t leak. They know firsthand what it’s like living under a microscope. It was a ridiculous accusation.
David hasn’t always been on the right side of public opinion, as a pp has detailed. He is particularly guilty of not always paying his fair share of taxes to the UK in the past, however has never done anything illegal. That being said, he is proud of his heritage and country and respects the institution that is the Royal Family. He queued for 12 hours with the masses to pay his respects to the late QEII. He also offers his time to support the King’s Foundation. As I posted above, he was happy to support Harry with Invictus but Harry snubbed him at the event and that was the end of any relationship they had. People need to have boundaries. David was right to not support Harry further after this.
I don’t agree with you, as I believe that the Beckhams would not have continued to be friends with the Sussexes regardless because they value loyalty and family. They would have distanced themselves anyway, as have many others have, because of how they have and continue to behave. That makes them even more decent IMO. They have values, Harry and Meghan don’t.
I certainly don’t blame the Beckhams for not giving the Sussexes the time of day.

Rumshotsandrainshowers · 09/09/2024 12:06

MummyJ12 · 09/09/2024 11:57

Actually I think David and Victoria are likely quite decent people. They are clearly very private.i think David would have continued to be friends with Harry and Megan had they behaved decently. Accusing Victoria of leaking is actually mind boggling. It shows you just how important Megan thinks she is. How superior. Even I know there is no way Victoria was sitting phoning the press. She’s prob one of the most discreet people out there.

however Harry and Megan making false accusations of people leaking about them isn’t something new. It’s really the corner stone of spare.

I can respond more thoroughly now!

Firstly, of course the Beckhams wouldn’t leak. They know firsthand what it’s like living under a microscope. It was a ridiculous accusation.
David hasn’t always been on the right side of public opinion, as a pp has detailed. He is particularly guilty of not always paying his fair share of taxes to the UK in the past, however has never done anything illegal. That being said, he is proud of his heritage and country and respects the institution that is the Royal Family. He queued for 12 hours with the masses to pay his respects to the late QEII. He also offers his time to support the King’s Foundation. As I posted above, he was happy to support Harry with Invictus but Harry snubbed him at the event and that was the end of any relationship they had. People need to have boundaries. David was right to not support Harry further after this.
I don’t agree with you, as I believe that the Beckhams would not have continued to be friends with the Sussexes regardless because they value loyalty and family. They would have distanced themselves anyway, as have many others have, because of how they have and continue to behave. That makes them even more decent IMO. They have values, Harry and Meghan don’t.
I certainly don’t blame the Beckhams for not giving the Sussexes the time of day.

Edited

I think you misread my post, I said continued to be friends if Harry and Megan had behaved decently,

MummyJ12 · 09/09/2024 12:07

Well then that makes two of us @Rumshotsandrainshowers 😁

Rumshotsandrainshowers · 09/09/2024 12:08

Abouttimeforanamechange · 09/09/2024 11:55

Oprah used Megan and Harry to get the interview, then kicked them to the curb.

They also blatantly used Oprah to launch a public attack on the RF, in which much of what they said was shown to be total bs. And Oprah's own production team screwed up in showing headlines from non-UK newsapers to illustrate the 'racist British media' allegations. Whole thing probably screwed any chance Oprah might have had of getting a serious interview with anyone royal-adjacent.

I don't have much sympathy, because a bit of due diligence might have warned her what she was getting into, but I don't blame her for being wary.

Agree absolutely they did, but I doubt Oprah wanted an interview with anyone else so much she’d jettison Harry and Megan’s interview, they were the scoop of the century, let’s face it Charles or Kate ain’t going in Oprah.

oprah was more than happy for Harry and Megan to mount an attack, cmon she prob encouraged it. That’s what made it global headlines.

MummyJ12 · 09/09/2024 12:09

You didn’t make it clear on decently to who. Yes, absolutely the friendship would have survived if H&M had have behaved decently to both the Beckhams and the Royal Family. Of course.

Rumshotsandrainshowers · 09/09/2024 12:09

MummyJ12 · 09/09/2024 12:07

Well then that makes two of us @Rumshotsandrainshowers 😁

I don’t really understand no one else has, unless you’re saying you’ve multiple personalities?

MummyJ12 · 09/09/2024 12:11

You seem to have misread my post about the Beckhams at 11:20. As you then posted as though I had slighted the Beckhams in some way, hence me responding to you further @Rumshotsandrainshowers. 🤔

Rumshotsandrainshowers · 09/09/2024 12:18

MummyJ12 · 09/09/2024 12:11

You seem to have misread my post about the Beckhams at 11:20. As you then posted as though I had slighted the Beckhams in some way, hence me responding to you further @Rumshotsandrainshowers. 🤔

I really didn’t think you’d slighted the beckhams nor would I care if you did, you are genuinely misinterpreting. I am also not looking to fight or argue with people on line, that’s not my bag, so please move on.

SadOrWickedFairy · 09/09/2024 12:23

Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York did an interview with Oprah in 1996. Oprah seems to be the go-to for interviews by ex Royal family members.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread