Why do Harry and Meghan tell porkies that are so easy to prove wrong?

[YaMuvva]

Starting with the porkie that Archie wasn’t gonna be titled. Anyone who understands the Letters Patent would know that as long as the Queen was alive this was never gonna happen. I said this when watching the Oprah interview and I’m pretty appalled they told such an easily provable lie.

Then Harry said that daddy cut his security off. Anyone who knows about RAVEC knows it is independent of the Royal Family and Charles couldn’t do this if he tried. Same with “Only titled people get security” / this was so easy to prove wrong.

And why are there 2 versions of the proposal story. Did they think we wouldn’t notice? Is one a Hollywood version for their American audience?

The same with the ‘how they met’ story - in their engagement interview they said it was a blind date, to Netflix they met on Instagram.

I also was puzzled at her saying she never wore bright colours and that royal women could never wear the same colour as the Queen. It’s just nonsense. See below pictures.

Why do they do this? My theory is that everything they do now is for an American audience who are used to the reality TV narrative of “Some scenes have been created for entertainment” style TV and just accept their narrative as partly fictional, as long as it’s entertaining?

Probs until Meghan and Harry stop behaving like a couple of spiteful, arrogant twerps. Could be a while.

Hmmm

I wonder when Meghan will get over not being able to win Kate over? The shopping trips missed, the lipgloss unshared, the crap tailoring noted.

And it ain't envy and hatred, it's 🙄 annoyance that two individuals can lack any form of self reflection and can be so self centred.

Ellaelle · Today 14:49

It's in the papers hun, but I suppose you're too busy on your h an m witch hunt, anyway sweets get a grip lol

Oh dear - the 'mark of the beast': 'hun' and 'lol'.

The SS duty posters really do stand out on this thread.

Ellaelle · Today 14:21

Unsubstantiated?? Heheeeheee, if you say so! let's not derail someone asked me a question and I answered, it's a gossip site remember. I'm going to start my own thread about how consort Camille is prepping Rosey.

Ooh - go on then! I dare you. I'll look out for it.

But please do a spell-check first.

She was keeping an ear out for him when she heard him coming that’s what she did. If I visited my mum’s grave and found someone on their knees clutching the headstone I’d tell them to get up and fuck off.

Did the seals guide her as she rowed out to the island where Diana is buried?

To all the little SSers on here - all your repetitive questions have been answered too frequently to mention on these threads. What's more, they've been answered in far more detail and far more articulately than they deserve. Please read through just this one, and your questions will be answered, I promise.

But you know that! It's not our problem if you don't like the answers, or you are unable to understand any well-argued or well-supported point.

And learn how to use apostrophes. They are not for pluralising nouns (picking Rose’s). Mark off for SpAG in your GCSE

I think Zara would be fun to hang out with, on a more frivolous note how fabulous did she look at the recent garden party, her best outfit by far I thought

She did look fabulous. And the way she was poised, with the umbrella, at the bottom of the steps, she looked as if she was about to entertain the crowd with a quick rendition of Singing in the Rain!

Nice to see the senior and non-working royals quietly stepping up in support at the recent garden parties.

The shoes firmly on feet. The first greeting hugs yielding poorly concealed surprise rather than delight. The disappointment from one who expected instant intimacy from a stranger.

I think Sophie and Fergie would be a good night out. One of them where you end up half cut at 3am singing down the street and wondering how you can drink women half your age under the table 😂

@SirChenjins she didn't row out. How common! She was carried gracefully by a pod of seals.

I imagine this is what Harry regularly thinks now.

I shook my head.
It had been such a lovely fairytale, I thought. How did it get so dark so fast?

I’m 90% sure this once happened to Dick Van Dyke. Not at Diana’s grave but in the sea somewhere

I still don't get it 🤦‍♀️

Imagine the man in this picture is saying "Crocodile!"

@YaMuvva impressive !

amp.theguardian.com/film/2010/nov/11/dick-van-dyke-porpoises-rescue

Some people just don't have it, they just see surface only.... yet we can scratch the surface and it's very murky and stinks!

Because from the get go she has always been a fake. She also looks and comes across as one in her whole demeaner.

It doesn't surprise me she's hated so much by her own family and most people. Her and the entitled traitor are a good match.

As she isn't actually buried there, she's in a local church and I don't imagine there is any stone to wail over.

She isn't buried on the island?

😂😂

If you mean lies, say lies. And the answer to your question is I have no idea.

Since when?