Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Nigeria 3

1000 replies

OneHeartySnail · 13/05/2024 15:50

To continue the discussion!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
56
AliceOlive · 16/05/2024 02:14

@Wickedlywearynamechanged that’s wretched.

Wickedlywearynamechanged · 16/05/2024 02:15

I think it’s easy to focus on Christopher Bouzy. He’s posted some very wrong stuff.

instead challenge yourselves to look at the big anti Meghan accounts on Twitter, YouTube. They are making money out of this hate:

Samantha Markle and her brother aren’t the only ones. Far far from it. Look further.

AliceOlive · 16/05/2024 02:16

I’m not playing tit for tat but Bouzy’s account is also monetized and in my opinion he stirs that pot for ad revenue. Even if it’s harmful to Meghan and Harry, as long as he gets the views.

AliceOlive · 16/05/2024 02:17

Wickedlywearynamechanged · 16/05/2024 02:15

I think it’s easy to focus on Christopher Bouzy. He’s posted some very wrong stuff.

instead challenge yourselves to look at the big anti Meghan accounts on Twitter, YouTube. They are making money out of this hate:

Samantha Markle and her brother aren’t the only ones. Far far from it. Look further.

Bouzy is also. There is some evidence that these accounts are not all what they appear. I’m not convinced they are as they appear.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 16/05/2024 02:17

There is no ‘Cambridge Crew’ threatening to break peoples legs, burn house down, all of the dreadful things they have done are listed here on previous posts which you seem to brush over and equate to them being as bad as each other, they are not, it’s a completely different league and also if there was a Cambridge Crew Catherine and William would denounce it, not pose for pictures with members and thank them for donations.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 16/05/2024 02:21

Wickedlywearynamechanged · 16/05/2024 02:15

I think it’s easy to focus on Christopher Bouzy. He’s posted some very wrong stuff.

instead challenge yourselves to look at the big anti Meghan accounts on Twitter, YouTube. They are making money out of this hate:

Samantha Markle and her brother aren’t the only ones. Far far from it. Look further.

You mean you want to brush over Christopher Bouzy, sorry no, that campaign to destroy Catherine and William while she had cancer by him and his squad is unforgivable. I suggest you challenge yourself and look into the SS in more depth.

BemusedAmerican · 16/05/2024 03:26

A lot of misinformation out there.

Wickedlywearynamechanged · 16/05/2024 04:46

AliceOlive · 16/05/2024 02:17

Bouzy is also. There is some evidence that these accounts are not all what they appear. I’m not convinced they are as they appear.

I’ll take a look at Christopher Bouzy’s tweets.

It wouldn’t surprise me if it is a monetized account.

My point really is that there are two sides to this. The anti Meghan/Harry side and the anti royal side. You can find the anti Meghan side on Twitter and YouTube quite easily if you care to look. And some on both sides are extreme and some are not.

Wickedlywearynamechanged · 16/05/2024 05:06

@BemusedAmerican

I’ve read the Kremlin article before. It is concerning.

But it shouldn’t be forgotten that the British media (and Australia sky and NY post too, I think) were stirring the pot enthusiastically. It deliberately whipped up this frenzy, and then when Kate appeared in the video to tell us she was ill, they removed themselves from the story and blamed social media. One or two journalists wrote mea culpa articles, but the rest pretended that their hands were clean and anyone who said anything at all re Kate should be ashamed.

They’ve done this before, and they’ll do it again.

Thedom · 16/05/2024 06:55

H&M employed Bouzy and regularly extend personal support to the Sussex Squad members, it legitimises and encourages them.

The report from Bouzy didn't stand up to scrutiny, it was debunked and Bouzy has been exposed as a scammer.

Yes, there are anti H&M accounts too, but there is a big distinction in that they are more about being anti H&M , rather than being blind supporters of the RF who are trying to destroy H&M, its a very different animal. Even still, I don't think any of them have ever been given the stamp of approval in the same way Bouzy and the Sussex Squad have been.

MummyJ12 · 16/05/2024 07:15

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

This “report” was paid for by the Sussexes. The report was written by the Bot Sentinel company. Owned by Christopher Bouzy.
Bouzy is a more prominent and well known member of the Sussex Squad. He is the one who is still driving the conspiracy theories about Catherine!

He claimed the same about Amber Heard. He creates the algorithms and then uses the figures to “prove” the trolling. It’s sick.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/26883996/harry-meghan-cheerleader-target-kate/

Harry and Meghan's 'cheerleader' targets Kate moments after cancer diagnosis

PRINCE Harry and Meghan Markle’s Netflix “cheerleader” targeted Kate Middleton moments after her cancer diagnosis shocked the world. Christopher Bouzy, who had a starring role in Harry and Meghan’s…

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/26883996/harry-meghan-cheerleader-target-kate/

MummyJ12 · 16/05/2024 07:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

The YouTube report was written by Ian Sexton 🙄

MummyJ12 · 16/05/2024 07:25

BigWillyLittleTodger · 16/05/2024 02:17

There is no ‘Cambridge Crew’ threatening to break peoples legs, burn house down, all of the dreadful things they have done are listed here on previous posts which you seem to brush over and equate to them being as bad as each other, they are not, it’s a completely different league and also if there was a Cambridge Crew Catherine and William would denounce it, not pose for pictures with members and thank them for donations.

This!

AliceOlive · 16/05/2024 07:36

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Anything with Chris Bouzy’s name on it is not credible. He spends time trolling the RF. He’s concocted his own data to fit his narrative. the Newsweek article referenced his report.
He was even caught trolling himself I believe?

MummyJ12 · 16/05/2024 07:49

MummyJ12 · 16/05/2024 07:22

The YouTube report was written by Ian Sexton 🙄

No actually, the one you linked is still talking about Bouzy! There are ones that Ian Sexton has had an input in too.

Can’t posters see the difference between a number of crazy people who post odd things on twitter about Meghan. Some very hateful upsetting and racist but they are acting individually. There has been no proven evidence otherwise.

On the other side, it’s an industry and huge amounts of money is being changed hands:

-Sussex Squad to the media and individual journalists. They crowd fund.
-The Sussexes themselves to Bouzy for pseudo reports and bot farms. He also organises get togethers to talk tactics and next steps through his platform spoutible.
-Ian Pexton helping to fund all of the above and providing more data analysis as well as being very active himself.

The Sussex Squad are therefore much more successful in getting their misinformation out there. The pro Royal accounts also don’t multiple attack other users of these platforms and try en-masse to get users suspended or banned.

On top of this you have WME paying for positive media, suppression of negative media and using their other clients for celebrity endorsement. (Melissa McCarthy recently).

Also, you don’t see any of the Royal Family endorsing any of their supporters on social media. The Sussexes do. They invite them to events and allow them in and they arrange photo opportunities and this is what we know publicly, who knows what goes on that we don’t know about.

It’s not the same, please stop trying to argue it is.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 16/05/2024 07:52

Hard to believe it was seriously suggested that the Invictus people should "help Harry to rebuild his credibility"

I'd always thought their aims were much nobler than propping up some pampered prince and stopping him making an even greater fool of himself, but since it seems to have become the H&M show I guess it all follows

upinaballoon · 16/05/2024 08:00

I have heard of the Bouzy person before but not seen a picture of him. So he's another man in a grey suit........

MyFunnyDuckDuck · 16/05/2024 08:18

MummyJ12 · 16/05/2024 07:49

No actually, the one you linked is still talking about Bouzy! There are ones that Ian Sexton has had an input in too.

Can’t posters see the difference between a number of crazy people who post odd things on twitter about Meghan. Some very hateful upsetting and racist but they are acting individually. There has been no proven evidence otherwise.

On the other side, it’s an industry and huge amounts of money is being changed hands:

-Sussex Squad to the media and individual journalists. They crowd fund.
-The Sussexes themselves to Bouzy for pseudo reports and bot farms. He also organises get togethers to talk tactics and next steps through his platform spoutible.
-Ian Pexton helping to fund all of the above and providing more data analysis as well as being very active himself.

The Sussex Squad are therefore much more successful in getting their misinformation out there. The pro Royal accounts also don’t multiple attack other users of these platforms and try en-masse to get users suspended or banned.

On top of this you have WME paying for positive media, suppression of negative media and using their other clients for celebrity endorsement. (Melissa McCarthy recently).

Also, you don’t see any of the Royal Family endorsing any of their supporters on social media. The Sussexes do. They invite them to events and allow them in and they arrange photo opportunities and this is what we know publicly, who knows what goes on that we don’t know about.

It’s not the same, please stop trying to argue it is.

How can the RF protect itself against this in this day and age of bots, SM, Ai etc?

Wickedlywearynamechanged · 16/05/2024 08:26

Thedom · 16/05/2024 06:55

H&M employed Bouzy and regularly extend personal support to the Sussex Squad members, it legitimises and encourages them.

The report from Bouzy didn't stand up to scrutiny, it was debunked and Bouzy has been exposed as a scammer.

Yes, there are anti H&M accounts too, but there is a big distinction in that they are more about being anti H&M , rather than being blind supporters of the RF who are trying to destroy H&M, its a very different animal. Even still, I don't think any of them have ever been given the stamp of approval in the same way Bouzy and the Sussex Squad have been.

I don’t agree that one side is worse than the other.

H&M employed BOT sentinel in 2020 or 2021. Bouzy appeared on their Netflix series in 2022. He was employed by them. are we really to be held to account for the actions of people we have employed. Just in friendships alone, Charles and Andrew have both shown some really really really bad judgement. And Camilla is a mate (some say acquaintance) of Clarkson and had him write for the Country Living magazine Country when she was guest editor, there’s a documentary on it.

Clarkson is the author of The Sun article where he tells us he hates Meghan at a cellular level, she’s worse than rose west and lies awake at night dreaming of her being marched naked through the streets of the towns of England being pelted with excrement. Is Camilla to blame for that? She’s engaged his writing services.

Time to stop arguing who is worse I think. There is extreme on both sides but it’s rare to see ones with voices be so extreme I must admit. Clarkson, piers Morgan (wants to see them form limb from limb); Lady C who obviously hates Meghan and questions whether Meghan gave birth to her children - amongst other things. Angela Levin, who has never met Meghan but ‘poor Harry’ completely taken in by an evil witch and Meghan making all these demands at a preschool book reading such as a classroom having to be carpeted green (total bullshit). Tom Bower ‘it’s Meghan I’m after’ and so on. If you can’t see this then you don’t want to, imo.

Babybreath · 16/05/2024 08:30

I'm not nearly as clued up on bots and AI as some posters but the whole thing really scares me , what on earth are things coming to?

jeffgoldblum · 16/05/2024 08:31

Have we heard any more about the African parks scandal?
Or has it been swept under the carpet and forgotten?

MummyJ12 · 16/05/2024 08:35

You just don’t want to see it @Wickedlywearynamechanged my posts have explained why it’s not the same but as always, it’s more convenient for some people to turn a blind eye as to what has been going on.

Why else do you think the Princess of Wales was driven to making that announcement.

The Chinese and Russian bot farms were being specifically aimed at her. Not Meghan!

The Sussex Squad hate and misinformation gets through to the mainstream on a regular basis and that is because it is an orchestrated, coordinated machine.

But there’s no point in wasting time on people who don’t want to hear it. Yet there are people who are still picking up the pieces from the destruction that this hate group has caused. Including the Princess of Wales.

Mylovelygreendress · 16/05/2024 08:59

jeffgoldblum · 16/05/2024 08:31

Have we heard any more about the African parks scandal?
Or has it been swept under the carpet and forgotten?

I frequently ask that same question but silence …..
By the way , have any more celebs posed with their jam ?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread