Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Kate Gate

1000 replies

Saladcreamdreams · 14/03/2024 21:39

Do not read or comment if you aren't interested!

Shamefully starting a new Kate related thread for the fellow people like me who are so far down the rabbit hole they need to talk it out with fellow tin foil hat wearers 🤙
I want to know.. what do you think?
Where is she?
The wild theories?
Will she make the Easter Day service?
What the hell is going on over at KP?

I think she's seriously ill and will be stepping back soon.

I've got popcorn and I've got alllllll night, let's dissect.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
28
OnHerSolidFoundations · 19/03/2024 05:14

PandyMoanyMum · 14/03/2024 21:51

I think King Charles is seriously ill and other stories are being created as a distraction.
I think Kate has had an attack of Crohns (or similar) had a stoma and is hoping to have it reversed. She’s on steroids and looks puffy, and given how vicious people are she is staying away. The press know but are livid and trying to up the pressure to spill about the King’s health by taunting Kate.

This.

Severalwhippets · 19/03/2024 05:22

OnHerSolidFoundations · 19/03/2024 05:14

This.

Kate is effectively being thrown under the bus for Charles? I don’t believe he would allow that, he is a principled and kind man if nothing else.

Why would they allow such terrible damage to be done to the future Queen? Unless she isn’t going to be a future Queen. It’s just unthinkable. I agree it’s being ‘allowed’ to continue though, for sure someone is giving the green light for this horror to continue. It’s not an accident at this point.

Severalwhippets · 19/03/2024 05:24

If this is Russian inference I can’t understand why the palaces haven’t made any effort to stabilise or improve the situation with an honest and transparent statement and explanation.

Theunamedcat · 19/03/2024 06:29

Severalwhippets · 19/03/2024 05:24

If this is Russian inference I can’t understand why the palaces haven’t made any effort to stabilise or improve the situation with an honest and transparent statement and explanation.

She has said she will tell people at a later date im irritated that they have bowed to the baying mob tbh I wouldn't have given in its simply no-one else's business

Calliopespa · 19/03/2024 06:33

Nono22972 · 18/03/2024 22:24

Obviously, DV is no private family matter that should be immediately reported and exposed.

I'm struggling to understand how these DV rumours came about though

As for an affair, if he had an affair and she decided to forgive and forget, that's their business

Edited

None of it is our business.

All this leveraging to try to say we “ pay” for them ( one poster said “ I fund” their lifestyle. Given the level any member of the public is impacted, it was ridiculous to use the pronoun “I”) is just repellent in so far as it implies we have somehow bought their privacy. We don’t “need to know” anything about any of it. Even KC, the reigning monarch, doesn’t make key decisions that make the exact state his health critical to the daily running of the country.
The truth is many resent the RF and are alive to any opportunity to ridicule or denigrate them. Hence the twisting of the attempt to maintain some privacy into “ lying” or “ deceit.” The debate about a republic is a valid one, but the hounding of a recovering individual to further that debate ( though I’m not sure it does as many of us “not bothered “ types have been made to feel turned off by the tactics and malice) is just low.

Severalwhippets · 19/03/2024 06:36

Calliopespa · 19/03/2024 06:33

None of it is our business.

All this leveraging to try to say we “ pay” for them ( one poster said “ I fund” their lifestyle. Given the level any member of the public is impacted, it was ridiculous to use the pronoun “I”) is just repellent in so far as it implies we have somehow bought their privacy. We don’t “need to know” anything about any of it. Even KC, the reigning monarch, doesn’t make key decisions that make the exact state his health critical to the daily running of the country.
The truth is many resent the RF and are alive to any opportunity to ridicule or denigrate them. Hence the twisting of the attempt to maintain some privacy into “ lying” or “ deceit.” The debate about a republic is a valid one, but the hounding of a recovering individual to further that debate ( though I’m not sure it does as many of us “not bothered “ types have been made to feel turned off by the tactics and malice) is just low.

So you think it’s perfectly okay for William and Kate to deceive the public with at least one fake photo? That they themselves said was indeed fake.

Severalwhippets · 19/03/2024 06:41

Calliopespa · 19/03/2024 06:33

None of it is our business.

All this leveraging to try to say we “ pay” for them ( one poster said “ I fund” their lifestyle. Given the level any member of the public is impacted, it was ridiculous to use the pronoun “I”) is just repellent in so far as it implies we have somehow bought their privacy. We don’t “need to know” anything about any of it. Even KC, the reigning monarch, doesn’t make key decisions that make the exact state his health critical to the daily running of the country.
The truth is many resent the RF and are alive to any opportunity to ridicule or denigrate them. Hence the twisting of the attempt to maintain some privacy into “ lying” or “ deceit.” The debate about a republic is a valid one, but the hounding of a recovering individual to further that debate ( though I’m not sure it does as many of us “not bothered “ types have been made to feel turned off by the tactics and malice) is just low.

The public do pay for the royal family though to the tube of £86 million a year, they are absolutely within their rights to expect not to be deceived as a bare minimum, and moreover if the RF wish to have entirely private lives then that can certainly be arranged. The funding can stop and they can step back. They can’t have it both ways!

GoldThumb · 19/03/2024 06:49

Severalwhippets · 19/03/2024 06:36

So you think it’s perfectly okay for William and Kate to deceive the public with at least one fake photo? That they themselves said was indeed fake.

Cant take this seriously, not you posting this straight after posting that totally AI generated image and using it as ‘proof’ 😂

Nono22972 · 19/03/2024 07:25

Severalwhippets · 19/03/2024 05:22

Kate is effectively being thrown under the bus for Charles? I don’t believe he would allow that, he is a principled and kind man if nothing else.

Why would they allow such terrible damage to be done to the future Queen? Unless she isn’t going to be a future Queen. It’s just unthinkable. I agree it’s being ‘allowed’ to continue though, for sure someone is giving the green light for this horror to continue. It’s not an accident at this point.

Kate is effectively being thrown under the bus for Charles? I don’t believe he would allow that, he is a principled and kind man if nothing else.

Are you serious? We are talking about King Charles.

Listen, I do think there are a lot of inconsistencies in what Harry says but the one thing I've always believed is how Charles would brief against his children in the press.

It's been documented before.

The documentary was even banned from the BBC

Just a few weeks after Diana died, Charles hired Mark Bolland and started a PR campaign to rehabilitate Camilla and make her more appealing to the public.

Less than a year after Diana died, the Sun released a story about a private meeting between William and Camilla. The article was so detailed that only a person who was actually there could've known all of this. It's been rumoured for years that Charles office leaked that story to the Sun to make it look like his sons had accepted Camilla as the main woman in Charles' life. Harry talked about it in his book

There's also rumours that Charles was behind Sophie's topless photos being leaked because his PR team was working overtime to rehabilitate Camilla yet Sophie was getting positive coverage

After seeing that documentary, I even started to wonder if Charles was behind Catherine getting all that negative press back in the day because that was the time he and Camilla were engaged/got married and William was always more popular.

Kate Gate
Severalwhippets · 19/03/2024 07:34

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Calliopespa · 19/03/2024 07:37

Severalwhippets · 19/03/2024 06:36

So you think it’s perfectly okay for William and Kate to deceive the public with at least one fake photo? That they themselves said was indeed fake.

I don’t think it was ok; I think it was unwise, and actually needless.

But I am not about to inflate it to more than it was in order to drive an agenda.

Calliopespa · 19/03/2024 07:40

Severalwhippets · 19/03/2024 06:41

The public do pay for the royal family though to the tube of £86 million a year, they are absolutely within their rights to expect not to be deceived as a bare minimum, and moreover if the RF wish to have entirely private lives then that can certainly be arranged. The funding can stop and they can step back. They can’t have it both ways!

Think of it as a couple of quid for some bank holidays. I’d happily pay that.

Radyward · 19/03/2024 07:41

Im beginning to think they arent allowing a close up of her face
Whats going on with that
Ie plastic surgery ??? Very weird
.i think being specific about the surgery saying abdominal was to send the public completely off on the wrong tangent. Dunno super weird super staged . Poor Kate. I feel sorry for her on this circus anc embroiled with the creepy workings of the RF .

mardylookingfrump · 19/03/2024 07:43

Calliopespa · 19/03/2024 07:40

Think of it as a couple of quid for some bank holidays. I’d happily pay that.

I’d happily pay my £2 for some bank holidays but not have the royal family; maybe without funding them we can have the bank holidays and a nationwide sausage fund for the barbecue.

GoldThumb · 19/03/2024 07:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Well yes. The altered AI image you posted is certainly fake.

So, thanks for confirming I guess?!?

Severalwhippets · 19/03/2024 07:46

Calliopespa · 19/03/2024 07:37

I don’t think it was ok; I think it was unwise, and actually needless.

But I am not about to inflate it to more than it was in order to drive an agenda.

Sorry, I am confused what ‘agenda’? Would you care to share it as I have no idea. I am a royalist and always have been, but this has tested my support to the absolute limit. I can’t bear liars.

Severalwhippets · 19/03/2024 07:47

GoldThumb · 19/03/2024 07:46

Well yes. The altered AI image you posted is certainly fake.

So, thanks for confirming I guess?!?

How strange, the original photo is fake. It’s not of Kate full stop.

RandolFlagg · 19/03/2024 07:48

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

MyopicBunny · 19/03/2024 07:49

The public do pay for the royal family though to the tube of £86 million a year, they are absolutely within their rights to expect not to be deceived as a bare minimum, and moreover if the RF wish to have entirely private lives then that can certainly be arranged. The funding can stop and they can step back. They can’t have it both ways!

👏👏👏

celiajg · 19/03/2024 07:52

Kate had a hysterectomy. There is no mystery. She's off work until the time she said she would be back.

MyopicBunny · 19/03/2024 07:54

The RF have said it was not a hysterectomy.

LadyMuckonpancakes · 19/03/2024 08:26

MyopicBunny · 19/03/2024 07:54

The RF have said it was not a hysterectomy.

Have they? When?

MassageForLife · 19/03/2024 08:32

"he is a principled and kind man if nothing else"

Since when?

This is the grown man who proposed to someone who was still a teenager, when he wanted to be with someone else.

Sure, he's interested in (selling high priced) organic produce as well as climate change. I'm not sure that counts as 'kind', however.

Calliopespa · 19/03/2024 08:32

mardylookingfrump · 19/03/2024 07:43

I’d happily pay my £2 for some bank holidays but not have the royal family; maybe without funding them we can have the bank holidays and a nationwide sausage fund for the barbecue.

National Sausage Fund! 😂

quantumbutterfly · 19/03/2024 08:38

Theunamedcat · 19/03/2024 06:29

She has said she will tell people at a later date im irritated that they have bowed to the baying mob tbh I wouldn't have given in its simply no-one else's business

Did you think the same thing when Diana's boys were paraded for the public after her death?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.