Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Expert says Wales family photo, unlikely to have been edited by Kate.

223 replies

Primrosecottagelover · 12/03/2024 05:18

An expert, Jenny Smith from the American Graphic Institute has told the NBC, that the Wales family photo is heavily edited. The photograph appeared to have been edited by hand, not by AI and new clothing added. Smith told the NBC it would have likely been edited by someone very experienced, not Kate.
Expert on NBC: Kate unlikely to be the editor of the photo https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XWxTdEICMtQ

NBC 10 talks to graphics expert who analyzed Princess Kate's family photo

NBC 10 News on Monday talked to an expert in user experience who analyzed the photo of the Princess of Wales and her children that was pulled by leading news...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XWxTdEICMtQ

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
LadyEloise1 · 12/03/2024 20:27

Could someone explain to me why there is such a fuss over photos please ?

ChVrches · 12/03/2024 20:29

There are people who believe that the photo was faked and that the Princess of Wales is dead, in a coma, getting divorced, held prisoner to have a baby, had a facelift, had a Brazilian butt lift ,a lesbian - take your pick.

RoyalDramaLlama · 12/03/2024 20:38

ChVrches · 12/03/2024 20:10

You are literally making this up. No one knows.

The photo, no matter what Kate did was a KP error, because they should never have allowed it to be sent out to news agencies. That is basic practice for any organisation. They or at least Wiliam as their boss should have claimed it as their error, because they did not do their own due diligence on it. Then coincidentally, William and Kste are papped together, even though they weren't going anywhere together, as if there is only one car in the Royal Household. Pull the other one.

Dabralor · 12/03/2024 20:41

LadyEloise1 · 12/03/2024 20:27

Could someone explain to me why there is such a fuss over photos please ?

It's a fuss because it calls into question the trust placed in the royal family as public servants.
If this image is manipulated, what else has been manipulated?
Is it just images that have been manipulated, or do they manipulate other materials too?

They receive public money yet are not being shown as fully honest and accountable to that public.
That's the fuss. It's actually not to do with poor Kate directly.

ChVrches · 12/03/2024 20:42

@RoyalDramaLlama your recent post has not provided any evidence that you know anything for a fact. These are your perceptions of what may have happened which you are entitled to hold but they are not facts. eg "made her drive round in a car". This is from your head and not fact.

RoyalDramaLlama · 12/03/2024 20:53

Icedlatteplease · 12/03/2024 14:05

My apologies for picking the most expedient explanation of the UK constitution

I could have chosen the UK Parliament website to explain how our code of laws make up the constitution of the UK

https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/constitution/

Or the constitution Society

https://consoc.org.uk/the-constitution-explained/the-uk-constitution/

There are many laws outlining/limiting the relationship between monach and Parliament. For example Bill of Rights 1689 uk gov based on the principles of the Magna Carta. Or the Acts of Union 1707 which focused on codifying the joining of English and Scottish law

For those of us that do prefer lighter reading Time offers lighter reading regarding the laws the royals are allowed to ignore here. (Thus implying they do have to follow the rest)

But you are right. Nothing is fixed is stone. Laws can be changed. But there are Laws that codify how that happens too.

The symbolism of black rod in the opening of parliament is about the Independence of parliament to rule
UK gov. I think that may be what you are trying to say but I'm really not sure. It really is just pomp and ceremony as opposed to anything actual legal.

Edited

We have an unwritten Constitution, which is made up laws, treaties and conventions. Any of those things can be overridden by Parliament, which is supreme. Unlike those countries with a written Constitution. There the written Constitution is supreme and cannot easily be changed ( see guns in the US and the recent Irish referendum). Where we are talking about the powers of the Monarchy, we are talking about several situations where the legislature ( government) has proposed legislation and the Monarchy has demanded an exemption before it has gone to Parliament. So of course they comply with the law because the legislation has been passed with an exemption that they have had written in just for them.

LifeExperience · 12/03/2024 20:55

Everyone who has never edited a photo on social media raise your hand. Yep, thought so. Get over it people!

Inkanta · 12/03/2024 20:56

Dabralor · 12/03/2024 20:41

It's a fuss because it calls into question the trust placed in the royal family as public servants.
If this image is manipulated, what else has been manipulated?
Is it just images that have been manipulated, or do they manipulate other materials too?

They receive public money yet are not being shown as fully honest and accountable to that public.
That's the fuss. It's actually not to do with poor Kate directly.

Edited

Yes well explained.

RoyalDramaLlama · 12/03/2024 20:57

ChVrches · 12/03/2024 20:42

@RoyalDramaLlama your recent post has not provided any evidence that you know anything for a fact. These are your perceptions of what may have happened which you are entitled to hold but they are not facts. eg "made her drive round in a car". This is from your head and not fact.

No one knows anything that comes from the Royals is a fact. We can infer from evidence we see in front of us.

WhatAreThey · 12/03/2024 21:16

LadyEloise1 · 12/03/2024 20:27

Could someone explain to me why there is such a fuss over photos please ?

KP issued the photo to media houses saying it was taken last week by Willy.
It's a lie. It wasn't taken last week nor was it a "photo snapped/taken". It's an amalgamation of at least two photos.

As much as the British Media are happy to kowtow to the RF this isn't the same for international media whom they sent the photos to. If it were the Royal Rota, they would've gotten away with it.

KP can't produce the original photo cos there isn't any such and they can't hurriedly put one together cos Kate's face can't be shown for at least another week.

Mother's day photos will usually have her engagement ring showing but even that is missing. Kate lives in Windsor with the children so that doesn't preclude her from taking a photo with them.

Kate's undergrad thesis was in photography of children and the Victorian era.
So for someone who studied photography in university, who has been praised as a fantastic photographer by most British papers to amalgamate different photos into one as a "proof of life" news update from her royal office staffed to the hilt means it was simply impossible to get a recent photo of them together.

Ofcourse there're loads of photos of Kate and the kids but foremost on their mind is that she can't be seen yet but they also wanted to continue deceiving the public she's well by way of a recently taken a photo so they created one digitally.

The king decades older, dealing with cancer on the other hand is well enough to record a video message for the commonwealth service.

WhatAreThey · 12/03/2024 21:22

LifeExperience · 12/03/2024 20:55

Everyone who has never edited a photo on social media raise your hand. Yep, thought so. Get over it people!

If you edit photos and add info to create an untrue narrative that is deception. Especially to your "employer" who pays you most generously for every single privilege you enjoy and requires very little of you in way of "work"; couple of social events a month!

Even your more senior "colleague", decades older is still "working".

Cosmeticchanges · 12/03/2024 21:57

LifeExperience · 12/03/2024 20:55

Everyone who has never edited a photo on social media raise your hand. Yep, thought so. Get over it people!

Me!! I think I've been living in a parallel universe because I've never ever changed a photo. Cropped it if there was lots of crap in the background but honestly I've never ever changed a single feature as I always think well anyone seeing it would know it wasn't true to life, lines, saggy jowls etc, what would be the point, I've clearly been living under a rock

Ratsoffasinkingsauage · 12/03/2024 22:10

OP is a classic bully.

pipsfromthefuture · 12/03/2024 23:39

Ratsoffasinkingsauage · 12/03/2024 22:10

OP is a classic bully.

What makes @Primrosecottagelover a bully? Reading their posts on this thread I don't see bullying?

ChVrches · 12/03/2024 23:48

RoyalDramaLlama · 12/03/2024 20:57

No one knows anything that comes from the Royals is a fact. We can infer from evidence we see in front of us.

I agree with your first sentence but it still doesn't make your fantasies true.

RemarkablyBrightCreature · 12/03/2024 23:49

Sadly I don’t find it shocking at all - what I find truly shocking is all the people who can’t see the royals for who the truly are. Charles is an odious man - and in all honesty I don’t think his bloody mother was much better. That level of sycophancy is bound to go to anyone’s head - it’s ludicrous in this day and age.

TheTimeIsNowMaybeNow · 13/03/2024 00:00

I haven't seen any bullying of Kate, most people don't believe it was her who did it and even if she did that lazy husband of hers should have taken the blame if she really is unwell as he was supposed to have taken the picture

ChVrches · 13/03/2024 00:08

I think we can all agree this is photoshopped?

Expert says Wales family photo, unlikely to have been edited by Kate.
ChVrches · 13/03/2024 00:09

as are the Duchess of Sussex's bunions. They like privacy too.

Expert says Wales family photo, unlikely to have been edited by Kate.
SpringSprungALeak · 13/03/2024 00:11

namechangeduetoimpatience · 12/03/2024 05:21

Because they aren't miracle workers. What is/was the RF trying to hide?

That Charlotte had been sucking/chewing her cardi cuff.

Neverpostagain · 13/03/2024 00:18

If it had been possible to get an unedited recent photo of Kate, they would have done so. They didn't. They couldn't. Why not?

WhatAreThey · 13/03/2024 00:19

Not a good one for the RPS.

Expert says Wales family photo, unlikely to have been edited by Kate.
Expert says Wales family photo, unlikely to have been edited by Kate.
Expert says Wales family photo, unlikely to have been edited by Kate.
CassandraWebb · 13/03/2024 00:45

I think it's obvious there is a big story we aren't being told.

The press wouldn't have issued a kill notice for a bit of tweaking and tidying up or a few colour changes. That's pretty boringly standard and they wouldn't risk pissing off the royal family over that.

I'm most certainly not a tin hatter but I do know a reasonable amount about how the press works

stealtheatingtunnocks · 13/03/2024 09:03

The RF and other institutions hVe easily been able to manipulate their image and hide information in the past.

The digital age has changed that. Maybe the RF hasn’t realised that yet.

Deardoofus · 13/03/2024 09:21

TheTimeIsNowMaybeNow · 13/03/2024 00:00

I haven't seen any bullying of Kate, most people don't believe it was her who did it and even if she did that lazy husband of hers should have taken the blame if she really is unwell as he was supposed to have taken the picture

Have you seen the posts on here? Making wild claims about her marriage, her health, calling her work shy when she is in her sick bed, demanding photos when she prefers not to be photographed during her recovery, speculating about intimate health interventions? It's a huge online pile on. I don't personally care about the monarchy, but I care about people. Kate is a human being and a pretty decent one as far as anyone can tell. No one deserves that level of hounding. It's a tidal wave of online hate.

Swipe left for the next trending thread