Op I was with you till you started all the daft bring on the revolution talk.of course this won’t end the monarchy lol.
on the initial subject matter. Yes, I read various reputable experts views after rhe picture was ran through forensic software.
it is a composite picture it seems. Ie pics brought in from other images and there was a very sophisticated tool used, rectangular something or another it’s called, and no amateur would use that. But there has been some sloppy editing also, so it does seem she may have had a crack at it too.
it is a major edit, not minor. 26 different edits. Most editing is her face and the kids hands.
What they can’t see it what other pics they used to create this composite image. It could have been just other snaps taken at the same time, but that’s possibly doubtful as it was done on a Mac in adobe. It does seem her face has been switched out. But could just be for a pic taken seconds before. But a huge amount of other stuff done to it.
it’s a very bizzare thing to do. They clearly want people to think she looks healthy , and that’s fine, but this was a foolish route to take. Their pr team should have known the huge risk in this. It would obviously have been better to issue no pic than one so heavily manipulated the agencies can’t trust its authenticity. And the fact they won’t issue the original is quite telling. It would indicate they can’t.