More Sussex PR antics

[Gottseidank]

Imagine using the victims of a school shooting for attention and PR. There seem to be no depths to which this pair will not sink

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13178107/Meghan-Markle-Prince-Harry-pay-surprise-visit-sister-teacher-killed-Uvalde-school-massacre-sing-happy-birthday-heartwarming-clip.html

I'm feeling very happy about it !

Oh apologies!!
I thought we were still talking about William and the Mother's Day photo!!! 🤪🤣

Puzzled how they think this makes them look good but I suppose sticking the boot in is their usual MO.

Nice work supporting another woman receiving abuse online, Meghan. 👏

It does say "sources close to the Duchess of Sussex" so it could be anyone . I wouldn't like my family or friends suggesting to newspapers what I would think. That's crazy! Or is it Omid Scobie?

Does Kate defend Meghan?
(disclaimer I don’t think either of them should get online abuse)

It’s bitter lemon Omid speaking on their behalf again no doubt 🍋

He won’t rest until heads explode.

Oh and didn’t she just attend an anti online bullying initiative? Oops.

At least Kate doesn’t stick the boot in.

Just looked and Scobie is busy on Twitter/X so my money is on him as the source …

Isn’t that the long and short of it?

I think that is a crucial part of the story here. This is where the Duchess of Sussex's associates are not getting it right. They say "oh well the Duchess of Sussex would never do that blah blah " while the Duchess of Sussex is reported as saying just a few days ago during the SXSW panel that it's often women speaking poorly about other women online. "I can not make sense of that," she said. This isn't good PR either. She says one thing. Her PR is selling a different image.

Given one of the most recent photos the Sussexes released was this one, I beg to differ with their opinion of themselves….

So did Meghan say it or a source ?

I read one comment that said 'she managed to iron her face, but forgot about ironing her clothes\ '😀

@Serenster who are those people?

That’s so filtered their features are barely discernible.

Why is the Duke of Sussex's head like a massive elongated melon?

What happened to Meghan’s neck? And why is her head bigger than her body?

I could be wrong but I THINK the photo has been …………altered ? Sorry - enhanced !

They released this image? Where?

Why is he trying to look like Bert from Sesame Street? Is Bert ok with it?

It’s Meghan and Harry at an event while they were in Whistler recently to mark one year to go until the Invictus games to be hosted there.

The photo mysteriously “popped up” on social media according to the website What Meghan Wore. The first picture of it I’ve found is from a very pro-Sussex account that has “Queen Meghan” in its username.

Wouldn’t be surprised if that family had to secretly sign something to make sure they didn’t post anything negative, as per previous leaks about their requirements for NDA’s and that only positive things should be said about them.

It says "a source", Samcro - all too often shorthand for just made up

I see Meghan is sticking the boot in via ‘sources’. What a humanitarian.

The real question is how ‘palace sources’ are apparently always Camilla/William but Sussex Sources are always made up/ not them? 🤷🏻‍♀️ A mystery.

The real question is how ‘palace sources’ are apparently always Camilla/William but Sussex Sources are always made up/ not them?

If that was in response to me post, @Ratsoffasinkingsauage, I don't think palace sources are necessarily Camilla/William, so I'm not sure where the "always" comes from

Come to that I don't automatically believe them at all unless they're named; it seems the safest approach given the amount of crap flung around