Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Kate Hate

422 replies

MamoruHisaishi · 23/07/2023 12:03

I came across some old threads in other forums and also articles where Catherine was being criticized for being lazy, dumb, overrated, a gold digger and called all sorts of names. There were even threads that questioned why people disliked her so much, and multiple pages of replies stating why she was so disliked. I am wondering why this seems to have now been forgotten, even if Meghan became the new media target, why is it hardly mentioned the amount of hate and vitriol that Catherine went through?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
AliceOlive · 10/03/2024 01:47

SammyScrounge · 10/03/2024 00:43

Diana and Ferrgie were never criticised for the sort of things that Meghan.is criticised for, mainly because Diana and Fergie were never so nasty ad Meghan is.

“Nasty” is such an ugly word. I also don’t think we should be judging any one woman’s experience against others.

I’m not sure why anyone would make a post like this anyway. It’s just wholly unpleasant and unkind to all women.

Is that what you intended?

eise · 10/03/2024 02:11

Tidsleytiddy · 23/07/2023 12:33

I always think Meghan should have a look at the abuse Diana and Fergie went through. She’d see it just goes with the territory and not solely aimed at her

So you think it's ok because someone else went through it? It's a bit silly isn't it?

jeffgoldblum · 10/03/2024 13:33

Why has an old thread been reactivated? , haven't we got enough of them for posters to slag of Kate?

AliceOlive · 10/03/2024 13:35

Usual suspects who start unpleasant threads about Catherine and her family and bump those threads in the wee hours.

AliceOlive · 10/03/2024 13:36

I usually notice it because everything is fairly quiet here otherwise.

jeffgoldblum · 10/03/2024 13:36

👍

AliceOlive · 10/03/2024 13:38

Also funny because the same posters will ignore me completely if I post anything supportive or defensive of Meghan. It’s not what they want to see. Very telling.

jeffgoldblum · 10/03/2024 13:40

I very rarely mention m at all but still get jumped on and lumped in with other posters! 🤷‍♀️ , it is what it is sadly!

Prydddan · 11/03/2024 18:33

wordler · 29/07/2023 15:43

I don’t think he lied.

I was just speculating about whether he’d use some of the leftover duchy money - now that it’s funding fewer households (until the Wales kids grow up) for any of his projects.

Other options is it just gets invested back into the running of the Duchy. It’s going to be interesting to see what William does.

Does William (and Charles before him, and Georgebin the future) actually have much discretion over how the Duchy funds are used? I always understood that the fund was carefully controlled by trustees appointed by the Treasury or a branch of government. So this isn't William's money, but money for the benefit of his family, in a carefully cobtrolled trust. I doubt he could give surplus away.

wordler · 11/03/2024 18:52

Prydddan · 11/03/2024 18:33

Does William (and Charles before him, and Georgebin the future) actually have much discretion over how the Duchy funds are used? I always understood that the fund was carefully controlled by trustees appointed by the Treasury or a branch of government. So this isn't William's money, but money for the benefit of his family, in a carefully cobtrolled trust. I doubt he could give surplus away.

The heir to the throne is given the revenue from the estate and can use it to fund their official work, private expenses and charitable work as they see fit.

The Duke of Cornwall is not allowed to do anything to the management of the estate which would significantly change the capital of the estate - so there is a system of government oversight for that - ie the Duke can’t sell off big chunks and keep the money for himself.

But he can choose how to spend the revenue. Charles was the first Duke to make the annual accounts public and easily accessible online - so it’s also possible to see ‘roughly’ how the money is being spent but not the smaller details.

So for example the accounts show that before Harry left the country that Charles was spending about six million supporting the households of William and Harry. But we can’t see exactly how that six million was divided between them and it’s not shown whether he was just giving them the money upfront or whether they were submitting invoices and getting reimbursed.

So as William can choose how to use the revenue as he sees fit, he can use any portion of it to fund charitable stuff.

Prydddan · 12/03/2024 08:33

@wordler

Thanks for your reply. It was the "as he sees fit" bit I wasn't sure about.

CoffeeCantata · 12/03/2024 16:07

AliceOlive · 10/03/2024 13:35

Usual suspects who start unpleasant threads about Catherine and her family and bump those threads in the wee hours.

And trying to wipe my brain clean of all the stuff I've read on here and elsewhere over the past few years, it's just a massive puzzle to me why or how anyone rational could 'hate' Kate (or Catherine, as we should call her). What on earth has that woman done? She smiles, she's friendly and professional, she doesn't rock the boat*, she's clearly a loving mother, she puts up with a hell of a lot of stuff which would break most of us etc etc. and actually may have impacted her mental and physical health for all we know (it certainly would mine!).

The only motivation I detect for the unpleasantness is from those who set her against Meghan - either in their own minds or in some actual situation - or those who feel she is an affront to their feminist principles just by quietly fulfilling her traditional role. Makes me so cross because some jobs are not about rocking boats and making it about you - and hers is one.

*I suspect that's partly what winds up some of MN's more militant members!

Catherine is said to have been bullied at school for being tidily dressed, well-behaved and achieving...and it seems many people still see those things as a good reason to give someone a kicking. How sad they are - but they do real damage, so shouldn't be excused or dismissed.

SundayMuddySunday · 16/03/2024 20:22

I really don’t get what all the fuss is about. So a picture was slightly changed. Big deal. Lots of famous people have their pictures doctored. The Press are upset because they see it as their job to manipulate the masses.

LadyPenelopeForever · 12/06/2024 15:29

Samcro · 23/07/2023 16:54

Brilliant post

I agree.

AliceOlive · 12/06/2024 15:36

jeffgoldblum · 10/03/2024 13:33

Why has an old thread been reactivated? , haven't we got enough of them for posters to slag of Kate?

Still happening!

AliceOlive · 12/06/2024 15:37

AliceOlive · 10/03/2024 13:35

Usual suspects who start unpleasant threads about Catherine and her family and bump those threads in the wee hours.

And this!

jeffgoldblum · 12/06/2024 16:03

🤔

JamieFraserSporran · 12/06/2024 18:22

They don't have anything positive to say about Meghan so they revive an old distasteful thread.

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 12/06/2024 18:27

JamieFraserSporran · 12/06/2024 18:22

They don't have anything positive to say about Meghan so they revive an old distasteful thread.

And liked a comment from nearly a year ago. Perhaps the poster who bumped that hasn't anything better to do but read old threads.

BlueParrotRedParrot · 12/06/2024 18:33

Resurrected by someone who started her own Wales hate thread and can’t be bothered to answer her own question on that one. Interesting to see whose post she’s repeated. Pigeons.

CoffeeCantata · 12/06/2024 20:12

Definitely pigeons!

Tizzwazz · 12/06/2024 23:04

LadyPenelopeForever · 12/06/2024 15:29

I agree.

Thanks @LadyPenelopeForever for this. I was wondering about all the hate for Meghan on this site and the post from @AcesBaseballbat about the history on here is illuminating! Some will say anything to ‘blacken’ the Sussex family. I note that it was a few months ago that people were still contributing on this thread. I don’t see any rules either about not using it.

If you’re interested here is just one article from one of the many, many people who have cottoned on to the strategies used against Harry and Megs.

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/prince-harry-meghan-markle-nelson-mandela-b2270406.html

Keep up the good work by keeping it real. I am still amazed at your thread. One photo and all they can talk about is Meghan on it. Wow! 😂

It is time to tell the truth about Harry, Meghan and my grandfather | Ndileka Mandela

It is true that I feel terribly disappointed whenever the Mandela name or face is used for commercial purposes without any benefit to the vision he stood for

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/prince-harry-meghan-markle-nelson-mandela-b2270406.html

LadyPenelopeForever · 12/06/2024 23:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

AliceOlive · 13/06/2024 01:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Wow, are you one of those accounts that uses Meghan’s photos as your own profile picture? I always wanted to see them have an AMA!!!

BemusedAmerican · 13/06/2024 03:16

The summer of positive PR campaign continues. Let's revive a dead hate thread and try to hit everyone over the head with the wonders of Harry and Meghan.

I am so impressed with the new PR campaign. The new PR guy is no Edward Lane Fox.

Swipe left for the next trending thread