Harry may be in trouble with his Visa application!

[polkadotdalmation]

So the American Heritage foundation has put in an appeal for their freedom of information application, to see Harry's original visa application, which has incidentally 'got lost'!

They feel that Harry has negated his right to privacy regarding this document because he has already put his drug use into the public domain.

The questions on the visa applications are about drug use or using substances you know to be prohibited, in your past or currently when the application was made.

Nothing to do with the fact cannabis is not prohibited in California currently and his current drug use.

Case I believe, is being brought against the department of homeland security, and the basis for the Heritage foundation is were equality laws followed or was Harry given preferential treatment because of his title. Interesting. Maybe Harry learns to keep his private drug use, private.

Didnt call you nasty. I said discussing other people getting divorced is nasty. You've said none of your family are divorced. Well there is divorce in my family and its really tough on the kids and its not something i want to speculate for others.

i havent mentioned anything about affairs

Where specifically did I I mentioned you Rocky? You quoted me so are you saying I meant you?

Why so defensive to my posts?

Sorrly my name is a bit further down

@BadgerB

I don’t think you are nasty although I think we have both been at cross purposes and muddling posters up. I’m sorry for that.

I maintain the same though - I am glad you are happy but I am not entirely sure why you think I need to know that or why I would be put out that you are actually happy. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Anyway - sorry for reading on the hoof and getting muddled. It has been a bastardy day. 🌻

fuckitbucket time rocky

I think you, me and Badger have been a tiny bit at cross purposes and some of that is me responding to bits on the hoof.

I’ll raise my hand up and apologise and back off this one because 1 - I’m tired. 2 - I’m crabby. And 3 - my head is mince swimming in soup.

So @BadgerB and Rocky - apologies that I muddled you up in bits. I stand by most of the general things I said though.

Even if it means I’m a crabby arse. 🦀

Who have I name called?

Mentioning a behaviour pattern and attributing it to a section of the community on here, but no one specific, is not name calling. Name calling is specific. Who have I name called?

I'll answer for you. No one.

But accusing me is gaslighting...aka accusing me of something I haven't done.

No worries x

And yes Rocky I did mention you further down the post - and this is why.

You reminded me that this was a discussion forum when I said it was a pity we couldn’t stick to the matter in the OP. (Copy above)

And if we are ‘allowed’ to deviate from the OP with mentions of other Royals/associates/accusations/insinuations as you allude to - I get it.

But by the same token others should be able to deviate too - regardless of whether some find it distasteful or not.

Like I said, it would maybe be nice if we could discuss the OP without deflections or distractions because it grows arms and legs if that happens.

That’s why. Nothing personal meant 🙂 👍🏼

Both are nasty in my book but speculating shouldn’t be acceptablefor one couple and jumped on if it is another.

I think the regrettable precedent was set with Charles and Diana, and to a lesser extent Anne and Mark. And there was a certain amount about Margaret and Tony, but the press was more circumspect then

Happy days though. I’m away to have a bottle of non alcohol lager (racy!) and watch this weeks Elizabeth 1 with Helen Mirren.

When the swashbuckling and derring do was hidden under a frock 😉 and quite possibly a red wig.

Superb 👑

Aye Rose

’Appen you are right…

This ain’t a new merry-go-round is it? 🎠 🎠

ArcaneWireless · Today 18:02
fuckitbucket time rocky

I think you, me and Badger have been a tiny bit at cross purposes and some of that is me responding to bits on the hoof.

I’ll raise my hand up and apologise and back off this one because 1 - I’m tired. 2 - I’m crabby. And 3 - my head is mince swimming in soup.

So @BadgerB and Rocky - apologies that I muddled you up in bits. I stand by most of the general things I said though.

Even if it means I’m a crabby arse. 🦀

No problem. Easy to get mixed up when so much is going on

Cheers flower 😊👍🏼

Where?
i made a post about name calling. I did not refer to you.
the accusations of gas lighting is a yawn fest

@Samcro If not me, then who's doing the name calling you refer to? I just wonder what your actual point is?

You accused me of gaslighting you
thsts my point

You accused people of name calling. Where? If there are any then report them. I can't see any name calling, but you stating it's happening, is gaslighting.