Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry but not Meghan

1000 replies

lipstickwoman · 12/04/2023 15:26

No surprise he's coming on his own to the coronation.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
Roussette · 13/04/2023 14:20

user1492757084 · 13/04/2023 14:16

It's disgraceful that Meghan turned down an invitation from Harry's father to his coronation. Meghan should be there in support of the man who walked her down the aisle and welcomed her into his family. Archie and Lily being out of the country and not witnessing any part of their heritage - even from the point of view of a youngster playing with cousins and seeing flags waving and horses and carriages - is also disrespectful of being a Prince and Princess of Britain.
Meghan should attend with Harry, ignoring any negative media coverage.

You are rather on your own with that view. Most posters on here whether for or against Meghan, think it is very much the right decision for all sorts of reasons

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:22

@MrsMaxDeWinter because Kate is now above her in rank! Megan would have to curtsey to both Camilla and Kate, Kate only to Camilla ( and Charles obvs).

MrsMaxDeWinter · 13/04/2023 14:24

What, she would get up from her seat in the Abbey, stroll along to Kate and curtsey, then go back to her seat?

Inkanta · 13/04/2023 14:26

MrsMaxDeWinter · 13/04/2023 14:24

What, she would get up from her seat in the Abbey, stroll along to Kate and curtsey, then go back to her seat?

😊

Nono22972 · 13/04/2023 14:26

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:22

@MrsMaxDeWinter because Kate is now above her in rank! Megan would have to curtsey to both Camilla and Kate, Kate only to Camilla ( and Charles obvs).

Family members are only supposed to bow to the monarch and consort. I don't think I ever saw William, Kate, Harry or Meghan bow to Charles and Camilla when they were Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall

Xenia · 13/04/2023 14:27

I think it is a pity they both did not come with a nanny to mind the children and then let the children be seen with their grandfather at some point so they could always say in later life we were there in the UK on the day of the Coronation. However at least Harry is going which is nice for his father to have both sons present.

wordler · 13/04/2023 14:27

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:22

@MrsMaxDeWinter because Kate is now above her in rank! Megan would have to curtsey to both Camilla and Kate, Kate only to Camilla ( and Charles obvs).

That’s technically how it works but in practice they don’t curtesy to each other among the family apart from to the monarch.

The only person I’ve seen in the family do anything like that is Edo, Beatrice’s husband - he sometimes gives both William and Kate a sweet and smart little neck bow. His Italian aristocratic roots showing through.

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:27

MrsMaxDeWinter · 13/04/2023 14:24

What, she would get up from her seat in the Abbey, stroll along to Kate and curtsey, then go back to her seat?

No of course not but should they come face to face then it would be required.

wordler · 13/04/2023 14:29

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:27

No of course not but should they come face to face then it would be required.

It absolutely would not.

Have you ever seen the Tindalls bow or curtesy to anyone in the family apart from the monarch?

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:29

@wordler do you honestly believe that this small opportunity to put Megan in her place after all the ill feelings she and Harry have caused would not be expected?

beguilingeyes · 13/04/2023 14:33

". A life Charles deceived and used Diana to secure yet he's being celebrated for it while his grand uncle who abdicated for true love is vilified. Wrapped values."

To be fair, his grand uncle was a Nazi sympathiser...

wordler · 13/04/2023 14:34

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:29

@wordler do you honestly believe that this small opportunity to put Megan in her place after all the ill feelings she and Harry have caused would not be expected?

I honestly believe it would not have been expected because it isn’t expected. Harry and Meghan still hold their HRHs - they are in exactly the same position in the order of precedence they were before they left and Meghan didn’t have to curtesy to Kate then because the family don’t curtesy you each other apart from to the monarch.

MrsMaxDeWinter · 13/04/2023 14:35

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:27

No of course not but should they come face to face then it would be required.

W and K were announced PPOW days before the Queen was buried. Kate and Meghan were face to face quite a lot, in public, at the walkout, at the funeral itself, at the service before that.

There was no curtseying then, in any of these face to face moments. No one else curtseyed either W or K either.

Methinks you are talking out of a body part that's generally not used for speech 😅

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:36

@wordler Kate is now a princess which ranks higher than a duchess!

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:37

@MrsMaxDeWinter well I think you ought to go study royal protocol!

wordler · 13/04/2023 14:37

wordler · 13/04/2023 14:34

I honestly believe it would not have been expected because it isn’t expected. Harry and Meghan still hold their HRHs - they are in exactly the same position in the order of precedence they were before they left and Meghan didn’t have to curtesy to Kate then because the family don’t curtesy you each other apart from to the monarch.

And even if the government took all their titles away they still wouldn’t be expected to bow and curtesy - again - have you ever seen Zara and Mike Tindall curtesy to any of the HRHs?

The family don’t curtesy you each other only to the monarch and consort.

Samcro · 13/04/2023 14:39

isn't Meghan a princess too? I know she uses duchess, but as Harry is a prince doesn't that make her princess Henry? like Kate would have been Princess william?

Roussette · 13/04/2023 14:40

Of course Megan would not have to curtsey to kate, that is laughable. I know posters on here would love that to be the case but it's bollocks

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:41

Samcro · 13/04/2023 14:39

isn't Meghan a princess too? I know she uses duchess, but as Harry is a prince doesn't that make her princess Henry? like Kate would have been Princess william?

Technically yes but Kate is princess of wales while Megan is a princess purely because of Harry so princess Henry! Duchess of Sussex is her main title.

PollyThePixie · 13/04/2023 14:42

MrsMaxDeWinter · 13/04/2023 14:24

What, she would get up from her seat in the Abbey, stroll along to Kate and curtsey, then go back to her seat?

It would be done when they first meet that day.

wordler · 13/04/2023 14:43

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:37

@MrsMaxDeWinter well I think you ought to go study royal protocol!

Again technically everyone below William and Kate in the order of precedence should curtesy to them. Apart from blood royals with HRHs who only have to curtesy to Kate when she’s with William. Without William she technically has to curtsey to them.

In practice they don’t.

Which is why Zara with no title but as much royal blood as Beatrice, Eugenie etc does not curtesy to her cousins. And did not curtsey to Charles before he became King.

Roussette · 13/04/2023 14:43

In this day and age curtseying is beyond pathetic
There is a picture out there of Zara curtsying to Charles or Camilla at one point and she looks like she's about to lay a ginormous egg. Or has been caught short

wordler · 13/04/2023 14:45

Roussette · 13/04/2023 14:43

In this day and age curtseying is beyond pathetic
There is a picture out there of Zara curtsying to Charles or Camilla at one point and she looks like she's about to lay a ginormous egg. Or has been caught short

Princess Anne does the deepest curtesies I’ve ever seen - I worry she’s not going to make it up again one of these days.

Samcro · 13/04/2023 14:47

gettingoldisshit · 13/04/2023 14:41

Technically yes but Kate is princess of wales while Megan is a princess purely because of Harry so princess Henry! Duchess of Sussex is her main title.

but Kate is only POW because she is married to Will.
so before that, as neither of them are born princess' they would have been the same?

Roussette · 13/04/2023 14:48

wordler · 13/04/2023 14:45

Princess Anne does the deepest curtesies I’ve ever seen - I worry she’s not going to make it up again one of these days.

It can't be worse than this!

Harry but not Meghan
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread