" @MaggieFS MaggieFS · Today 20:16
@EpicChaos If they weren't allowed WAbbey or St Paul's, why were they allowed St George's? Slight digression from the thread but I hadn't thought about her being divorced but getting married in church.
I'm not wholly sure tbh, I suppose it will have been mentioned at some point but I just can't remember offhand, so at a rough guess, I'd posit that it would/could be because St Georges' is, to the best of my knowledge, a private chapel, rather than a public building. That's only a guess though.
However, don't forget, even Charles and Camilla were not allowed a church wedding.
Other than that, I'd also suggest, that sheer size of Westminster Abbey and/or St. Pauls in comparison to St. Georges' would have been unsuitable for them as a couple - as i said, who else would they have stuffed in there that they didn't know.
@diddl
" diddl · Today 20:23
The lip gloss thing is really weird.
Wouldn't you just do without?
Can imagine being so desperate I would have asked to use someone else's!
Yes, I'd have done without!
Asking for the use of lipstick is a very personal thing, very intrusive, imo, rather like using someone elses very private nickname for your own ends! What next, the knicker drawer?
It's like putting your stamp on someone elses belongings, taking away the intimacy between owner and object. imo, of course.
@mixedrecycling ycling · Today 20:32
Ooooh, The Muppets would have been amazing! I might have watched, just to see them fanning self
Muppets would definitely have been worth watching - the rest
of " the spectacle " not so much!
"