To wonder if the allegations Harry has made against his brother might be true?

[pearlearringgirl]

We put the royal family on a pedestal, however they are a family with potential issues and dysfunction like a lot of families have.

I just find myself wondering if these allegations might have some truth behind them and what that might mean for the future of the royal family.

I also wonder what Dianna would think of this feud between her two boys. I expect she would be very sad…

We don’t want to get sidetracked, so perhaps you should start your own thread

Just trying to understand why it gets so contraversial.

No, trying to understand, but I will stop asking questions if that is a problem

@ParklifePenguin

I’d meant that comment for the other poster.

Once threads descend into big messes of racism allegations and counter claims, they end up deleted.

@Howsimplywonderful I replied to you mentioning racism actually.

Some posters do seem to accuse people of racism without considering if there are other reasons for criticism. I thinkit trivialises racism, which is part of the fabric of our society. As a POC I don;t support Harry and Meghan in everything they do or say

I'm not sure why a post on another board is being brought up here to bolster claims, it has nothing to do with us .

No, this board.

I've read this board and have not seen any racist posts about 'a woman' ?
Where and when , what did it say ?
No proof , no truth!
And don't say oh well it's deleted, anyone can claim a deleted post said anything.

OK, so you're now saying I am lying about a recently deleted racist post, because you didn't;t see it. About what I would expect. I am not allowed to show a deleted post so you get to keep accusing poc of lying about racism.

William looked very happy on the balcony with his family yesterday.

@jeffgoldblum

Did you see the photos yesterday. I think his daughter looks so like him

Yes @Howsimplywonderful , they looked great and she looked very cute ☺️.

Sorry, what's POC? Thanks

person of colour

@Cranberrystreet I think you're right

Im sorry what do Piers Morgan and Dan Wootten say that give anti_Harry concern? I don't listen (assume a podcast) so don't base my opinions on them so don't know what I should be concerned about?

@ParklifePenguin Thanks. MN did send me a list but I deleted it. 😁

You are privileged tom be able to ignore it

... he's grown and it's all behind him and he's changed

That's a lot of faith you're putting in him, SoTedious; I'd never dispute that people can change, but whether Harry has the insight to seems uncertain - especially remembering the types he surrounded himself with even after he'd met Meghan

Maybe let's wait and see how things pan out in the future before ccoming to any firm conclusion?

Harry is a literal prince: the fact he is being criticised and scrutinised and disrespected and ridiculed (instead of worshipped and having his word treated as law) on here shows we live in a healthy democracy. Well done all of us!

That's great... that means we can do the same to King Charles and Prince William then... we can criticise, scrutinise, disrespect and ridicule them. Just healthy democracy after all.....

I don't worship any of them, does anyone? Hope not, that would be worrying.

Well obviously?

Oh please! If only these threads did result in a proper discussion about the role of monarchy v the possibility of a republic, I would be fully on board! I am not particularly attached to monarchy of any sort.

Instead, they seem to just endlessly rehash Harry’s previous misdemeanours again and again , and because he is royal and clips of his upbringing have been filmed, the whole world gets to judge and harp on, whereas those of up who grew up in normal circumstances were allowed to make tits of ourselves when we were teens or young adults in total privacy and move on.

Believe me, my objection to all this vile hatred of him and his wife on-line, is absolutely nothing to do with him being royal and everything about him being a human being.

How is republicanism inconsistent with the view that Harry, 4 accidents away from being a king, SHOULD be heavily scrutinised? Ringfencing Harry doesn’t make sense from a republican or monarchist standpoint. I’m sure MN would actually encourage starting republican threads within the RF section as it would be a huge improvement on name-calling.