Positive thread on Meghan again

[Mummy194]

Now that at the other knock off MN chat has been shut down, we seem to have an influx of those posters on here with new or encouraged accounts.

For those who are not interested in trawling through negative post after the other. You can come on here for positive news about Meghan and Harry.

Why not, everyone else seems to be viewed positively, without 'cynicism'. I don't mind taking this at snail pace, we just post on the good things about H&M, they sure seem to be doing a lot of that lately, and it's really buried under the negativity on MN.

I imagine it depends who your followers are and who you follow perhaps?

You might want to refresh your feed as I counted 40 tweets before I got bored.

It’s nothing to do with followers, go into the general Twitter search and then you can get the global perspective.

Ahhh you don't believe me. Got you.

I follow different people to you. So it will throw up different results.

There are a number of articles saying Thomas Markle compares the Royal Family to Scientology.

And using the same search term as you, it throws up someone called Meghan Murphy and mentions Scientology.

I am not doing a screenshot of my personal Twitter but I object to your scepticism.

I know about Twitter thanks. I did that.

You obviously don't believe my twitter feed! I have put in exactly the same and there are two tweets. When I put it in an hour ago, there were none.

The first tweet says the RF is Scientology! So not about MM.

Oh, and there's a bottom feeder gossip site link which I refuse to click on, saying that Tom Cruise is looking to recruit her.

Apart from that nothing. You can disbelieve me if you want.

So what you’re saying is that because the Tweets don’t appear on your personal feed, they don’t exist?

I've had enough of this conversation. I did not say they don't exist. Stop twisting my words.

I said repeatedly that despite putting in the same search terms as you what you see did not come up on my twitter feed That is all.

You are more or less calling me a liar. I am not saying the same to you. I am saying what I can see with my eyes.
I won't be responding to you on this anymore.

I read something last night about this not on twitter. Meghan and Scientology that is. Because of the Oprah ad. I discounted it. If I had bdlieved it I would have said something on here. . The Sun has something to say about it too. Not much.

I can't believe there is any truth in this whatsoever but I could however believe they are the type of couple that would be right at the top of David Miscavige's (nasty little man) celebrity recruitment list.

I don’t hate M and I’m not a troll. People are allowed their own opinion and shouldn’t be called names if you don’t agree with them. Your trying to create an echo chamber on an open forum - it’s never going to work.

I watched a video recently of them both pushed to one side at some kind of formal occasion and felt really sorry her actually. Apparently they wasn’t following protocol and for that I put the blame firmly on Harry’s shoes.

I think she probably did feel steam rollered. But they are both cracking on 40 now and do need to start taking responsibility for some of their own actions. The constant public digging at his family is embarrassing. It’s like an argument being played out on facebook.

Personally I feel M feels short changed. She didn’t get the reception she thought she was going to get so sodded off back to US. Which anyone would do. Harry is the one with the axe to grind.

I stand by what I said up thread about Scientology - both of them are prime targets. They are both isolated with probably many people egging them on. I can’t see them being welcomed by the top celebs because they talk too much OR high society. They are stuck in a weird place. If high profile celebs that are involved in Scientology are reaching out it wouldn’t surprise me.

this thread is taking me back, all we need is the butcher and penguin.

They are stuck in a weird place. If high profile celebs that are involved in Scientology are reaching out it wouldn’t surprise me.

That is very possible Frazzled

Still, I would hope those closest to them would be sufficiently clued up steer them away from any of that nonsense. Let's hope we don't see them papped having lunch with Tom

'Trolls really lose their st with MM.'

'And the ones who keep repeating themselves over and over again, never seen people lose their minds over someone as much as this'

But op, everyone keeps repeating themselves though! supporters and their critics, that is the nature of debate. If you start a thread bigging up the Sussexes you must be prepared for challenges, it is a public forum not your own personal blog. Is trolling now disagreeing?

Calling people 'trolls' who calmy, reasonably and rather inconveniently highlight their hypocrisy is ironically rather unpleasant. Debate like a grown up! Of course there are trolls online but mn delete any unpleasant comments.

I must be inside the head of the haters! If that's so, I am quite prepared to deprogramme anyone who wants to break free of the hate!

interesting.

Calling people 'trolls' who calmy, reasonably and rather inconveniently highlight their hypocrisy is ironically rather unpleasant. Debate like a grown up! Of course there are trolls online but mn delete any unpleasant comments.
you must be reading a different thread to me.

'you must be reading a different thread to me.'

No no I've rtft. Some people seem to have a very oversensitive habit of calling people trolls purely for holding opposing opinions.

Trolls imo are people who are goady and offensive.

This -> Calling people 'trolls' who calmy, reasonably and rather inconveniently highlight their hypocrisy is ironically rather unpleasant.

applies to @Gorgeouslilgirl as well who mentions bitching as well.

so not grown up.

Trolls imo are people who are goady and offensive. so true.

If you start a thread bigging up the Sussexes you must be prepared for challenges, it is a public forum not your own personal blog. Is trolling now disagreeing?

It's hardly surprising I personally feel like it's trolling at times, given the history of these threads over a year or so. Given what happened last year. Given the constant NCing and personal insults/comments to posters. Look at some of the posts on here. People come on to pick and pick at posts and go almost as far as saying you lie about stuff (like the twitter disagreement above)

It's so wearing. Detractors can make any sort of sweeping statements they like which are largely just opinion and not fact. Yet we continually have to justify our position, provide sources, prove posts.

Bluebell... given you've come on a slightly more positive thread on MM and said she threw coffee at staff and also paid for Thomas Markle's pap shots, (both unsubstantiated and/or untrue) I'm really not sure that you can put yourself in the 'non goady' category.
Your posts so obviously are goading.

Trolls imo are people who are goady and offensive

Exactly.

Especially when they come up with their own things or what some other trolls have invented on twitter and BG or some bottom feeder like that.

@Samcro

This thread is taking me back, all we need is the butcher and penguin

It is like a blast from the past isnt it. That made me 😂

The -trolls- anti MM's already have enough threads where they create their own echo chamber, telling themselves all the fantasies and lies they do, see no reason why they are coming on here, to post what is basically irrelevant information.

@Samcro

Aren't these the 'penguins', having changed their names now to look like they are brand new.

We are not bigging up the Sussexes, these are actual projects and achievements they have in real life received. Not some fantasy like the perceived failure that they may or may not be.