Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Harry and Meghan news

999 replies

callmeadoctor · 08/06/2020 09:29

www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1292590/meghan-markle-prince-harry-la-career-plans-latest-royal-news

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
hoteltango · 18/06/2020 23:20

BarleylemonPenguin, I think that sums up the situation. I wonder how much Harry really understands it, and so how well he could explain it to Meghan.

FruitPastillesaregood · 18/06/2020 23:29

I can see them quietly fading into the background whilst cashing the cheques from Charles to be honest. I don’t think they have anywhere to go . It’s either that or come back with their tails between their legs. I don’t think they will ever do that.

StartupRepair · 18/06/2020 23:31

They are very vulnerable to wealthy people with their own agendas who may want to sponsor them somehow. It was not great judgement to start their freedom with a house loan from a Russian oligarch.

Viviennemary · 18/06/2020 23:33

I wouldn't be surprised if they do come back. I'm sure Harry won't spend the rest of his life in the USA.

FruitPastillesaregood · 18/06/2020 23:44

There’s no way Meghan will ever come back in my view.

MissEliza · 18/06/2020 23:58

@FruitPastillesaregood that is looking increasingly likely.

Halo84 · 19/06/2020 01:24

@TryAnotherNickname but do they retain priority in that time or could someone register a similar name / logo in that time and take priority?

My understanding is that no one can register the name until it is finally rejected.

@Puzzledandpissedoff, Cobblestone Lane LLC is the Delaware corporation that owns Archewell. Presumably, it is owned by HaM but that isn't publicly disclosed.

@BlueTreeBlue Jessica has not shown herself to be a nice person. The whole way she handled that situation was so odd, to pick out someone randomly and then threaten/ attack them.

I don't disagree that JM has not shown herself to be a nice person. However, I believe she assumed Sasha Exeter's call to tweeters to support BLM was directed at her personally. I'm not defending JM, just suggesting that, from JM's perspective, her response was not "out of the blue". I do think that demonstrates she either crafted a response after a few glass of tignanello, or she has a massive ego.

OneMile · 19/06/2020 03:32

Meghan is going to need to be really careful about how she handles Jessica Mulroney. I would doubt she will be ghosting her as the DM is implying. She is far too dangerous.

First there is the court case, even if JM does not give evidence - she won't want her being hostile.

Secondly it is quite clear that JM plants a lot of stories in the press, can you imagine what will get leaked if she is burned and has nothing left to lose.

The best way, I think would for the pair of them to team up with a respected black journalist (Gayle King?) and do a 'fire side' type chat - JM uses it to rehab her image, MM gets to talk about BLM, publicly (but gently) chastise JM whilst being an advocate for using mistakes as an opportunity for growth and change.

OneMile · 19/06/2020 04:33

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Halo84 · 19/06/2020 05:26

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

BlueTreeBlue · 19/06/2020 05:48

Halo, but Sasha Exeter’s call was very generic and aimed at everyone with large followings, she never named Jessica Mulroney. So I still find it surprising that Jessica took such big offence to it! It’s all a bit mad!

Halo84 · 19/06/2020 07:01

Yes, I believe JM misread Sasha Exeter’s tweet. I’m not defending JM, and I definitely believe she used her privileged position to threaten Sasha Exeter.

Oldbutstillgotit · 19/06/2020 08:14

I am wondering why JM thought that SE was aiming her message at her ? Was there already bad feeling ? It was such an OTT reaction .
It is tricky for MM but I agree that she will quietly maintain the friendship behind closed doors . At least until the court case is over !

Roussette · 19/06/2020 08:35

People have different opinions to you. That doesn’t mean the thread is ‘turning pretty horrible

What was said was.

And deleted by MNHQ.
So obviously, at the time, yes.

TryAnotherNickname · 19/06/2020 08:35

@Roussette nobody’s saying they’re creaming off the charities. It’s simply a more sophisticated version of Celebrities doing a turn on children in need when they have a record / book / show to sell. Everyone benefits from the association and H&M get to justify taking a private jet and £1m to talk to bankers. The charity would never otherwise have had that donation so they’re up, and get to say “yes but look at the finds we made for our foundation by taking to bankers / wearing a specific watch/ doing an elephant voice over” or whatever it is (much like the alcoholics who promote booze for cash and insist on a donation being made to the Portman group to justify it)

Roussette · 19/06/2020 08:41

Does anyone honestly listen to anything that Laurence Fox says? He showed himself up for what he is after calling racism 'boring' on Question Time, and worse, so him saying MM has left the UK for attention is a pretty irrelevant comment I would've thought...

Roussette · 19/06/2020 08:45

nobody’s saying they’re creaming off the charities

Umm... someone actually did say that. Saying they would be doing that. It's been deleted so I can't quote it. However, you dress it up otherwise, it's an unpleasant insinuation to make.

TryAnotherNickname · 19/06/2020 08:54

Oh well it’s been deleted so clearly I didn’t see it. I thought you were referring to a previous comment of mine. You seem to be taking this all v personally

Roussette · 19/06/2020 09:04

Why am I taking it personally, I'm intrigued. What a strange thing to say!

I saw a post that I thought was very unfair in its insinuation, so I called it out, why is that me taking it personally?! It wasn't a dig at me, so not personal, you saying that is funny

Viviennemary · 19/06/2020 09:25

I too find it a bit strange that Jessica thought this Sasha's tweets or whatever were aimed at her in particular. Unless there was more communication between them that wasn't made public. It did escalate quickly though. Who knows what is going on behind the scenes between Meghan and Jessica. Maybe she was waiting for an excuse to ditch J. Or maybe they're still friends. Who knows.

EthelMayFergus · 19/06/2020 09:47

Oldbutstillgotit It's possible that JM took an opportunity to have a go at SE because SE has some inside info on JM, regarding *'merching'. Sasha's aunt works at the same station/channel.

*I think 'merching' is sourcing items from designers without paying, then a famous person wears them and the press name the item and the designer. If the wearer is very famous, the mercher can receive payment or keep the garment/jewellery. If the item is to be returned because of payment the clothes can look a bit off, because they haven't been tailored to fit the wearer.

TryAnotherNickname · 19/06/2020 09:48

Entirely off topic but Sacha is very beautiful

SunbathingDragon · 19/06/2020 09:53

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ as it quotes a deleted post.

mrscampbellblackagain · 19/06/2020 09:55

I still think that H&M didn't quite intend to be in the position they are in. Their website back in January said they wanted to still do some royal duties and do the sort of half in half out thing. This would have been a lot better for them financially I suspect.

As others have said I think the reality of how much it costs to run their lifes is probably coming as a massive shock to Harry. I doubt he ever had to worry about how much rent/electricity/staff cost before as assume that was all covered by the RF.

And of course through covid into the mix and I think they are probably evaluating what their next steps are. Maybe they need to spend the next few years earning £££ and supporting charities but leave their own foundation/charity for a little bit further down the line when they are more secure.

And I know they are rich by most people's standards but not by LA standards.

MangoFeverDream · 19/06/2020 09:59

If the item is to be returned because of payment the clothes can look a bit off, because they haven't been tailored to fit the wearer

This is why a lot of us were suspecting that Meghan was merching (maybe through JM) because a lot of her clothing at events were so ill-fitting.

Swipe left for the next trending thread