@OneMile
The best way, I think would for the pair of them to team up with a respected black journalist (Gayle King?) and do a 'fire side' type chat - JM uses it to rehab her image, MM gets to talk about BLM, publicly (but gently) chastise JM whilst being an advocate for using mistakes as an opportunity for growth and change
I find this a very ugly suggestion.
Why on earth would Gayle King (or any other respected journalist, black or white) be interested in rehabilitating Jessica Mulroney’s image? Outside of MM, who many people are not remotely interested in, who even knows who JM is?
Why does MM need to talk more about BLM? What does she have to say about it to Gayle King that a more famous and better respected expert on the subject couldn’t do a hundred times better?
Now that I’ve made that point, this is also a good example of how H&M can easily come unstuck. The audience for them as individuals is small (by LA celebrity numbers) and only for the gossip, desperate tit-for-tat reality-TV style. Their only interest to large numbers of the public is as providers of RF gossip. There are so many, many more qualified people in pretty much every field than them. Their USP is being inside the RF, the one thing they can’t talk about. Nobody knows Harry or Meghan, they as individuals are not what pulled in the crowds. They, as Prince and Princess, is what mattered. They know this (hence the “HMQ doesn’t own the world Royal, Harry is still 6th in line you know” shameful petulance), but out of sheer arrogance don’t/won’t/can’t believe it (maybe they do now, but they didn’t at the time they flounced off).