@NotEverythingIsBlackandWhite
RC This is more unsubstantiated rumours, to sell papers and drive traffic to their site. And, oh look, it just worked!
NE I was on their site already so it didn't drive me to it.
Bigger picture- you then posted on here, so posters have to click to read and see if they agree with your point, or let it stand. And it's 'click bait' for those posters who are drawn to anti-Meghan stuff. People go over, ad revenue goes up- they will 'find' more of this shite to publish.
RC what is your understanding of "stage an intervention" that you think it will require more security.
NE I already said "whatever that means"... then you define it as to "be physically present that would involve having security with her."*
This is a big give away that it's clickbait gossip! Deliberately worded to be vague so people can attribute the worst interpretations. Lots of people get involved with politics.
RC Is she to blame?
NE Is she to blame for what?
Needing more security. This is a popular stick to beat her with (not saying you necessarily were!). When people comment on here, criticisms are often linked to her being materialistic or costing money for security by not withdrawing with dignity. But if we accept that she has a right to be out and about, physically, with protection, then great.