H & M - The Cat, The Barber and the Argyll Pheasant Pluckers

[TheMustressMhor]

I hope I've got what everyone wants in the title of this, the twelfth thread in the series.

It's great that we'll have this thread to observe and provide commentary, isn't it?

If the recent pics were taken by Splash I'm going to feel confident in saying that there is no way Meghan gave them the heads up.

If she did, and then threatened legal action, having previously successfully sued them....

Well...they would hang her out to dry faster than you can say "Smile Please!"

"Whether Meghan would work with a company she's used before against her husband's wishes is something we can't possibly know of course ... perhaps it's just one more of those unfortunate "coincidences"?"

Oh I think we can know. Whether we like the answer is another matter. It doesn't fit the pap walk narrative though.

Not sure if anyone posted about this?

Harry & Meghan wedding souvenirs removed from Royal Collection's website

Seems the pics of Meghan getting on the seaplane were provided by Splash too - there are endless pap photogs, but once again it's them who got the shots

Just another coincidence no doubt ...

Encyclo is confident and can KNOW, you guys
Breath-taking double standards on display.

hi all, not had chance to post on this thread yet, what did I miss?

If the dog walk photos weren’t papped, precisely who was H threatening to sue?

I am reading everyone's posts about paps/security etc with fascination. It's a million miles away from my life. We don't even have to lock the back door.

 indeed 7Worfs.

notmoresheep
no one is suing... 'threaten to sue' is not the same as suing.

Hey, I know I'm undermining your pap walk narrative with actual facts about the paps in question and their previous run ins with H&M, but if I have pertinent information I'm going to share it.

More than 90,000 people have signed an online petition from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation demanding the royal couple pay its own way.

“It’s clearly something that’s resonating,” said Aaron Wudrick, the federal director of the organization.

Now, 90,000 people is just 0.2 percent of the population. But polls show strong majorities of Canadians agree.

Does anyone think we'll end up footing the entire security bill?

bUt HOw CaN yOu kNowwwwWWW

no one is suing... 'threaten to sue' is not the same as suing.

Except they sued them last year...and won substantial damages. And the paps apologised.

That was from the Washington Post

Catherine I hope we only pay until they make 'enough' money. It's anyone's guess what Meghan deems enough. I am also certain they will not be the success they think they'll be. So in short, yes - we'll be paying.

Considering she's registered her company in Delaware no one but her ad her accountant will ever know how much they've earned

Is Harry not a partner in the company? Yikes if so.

Highly likely Catherine.

There’s another prog on the Royals on ITV now.

I really hope they aren't allowed to trademark any name including "royal" for commercial purposes.

As much as I disagree with paying for the security for these three , if they had carried on living in the UK the bills would be still there so I guess we will never win any argument against paying for them!
Rankles though.

ITV1 - Inside the crown: Secrets of the royals. Exploring how love and royal duty are in constant conflict, and how the Queen's marriage has stood the test of time.

They've been up late editing the ITV prog - it's right up to date!

There's lots of things to question the 'pap narrative' but they're not being addressed.

I imagine there will be a lot of negotiating over security bills but it wouldn't be fair to expect Harry and his wife to live without security.

It's anyone's guess what Meghan deems enough. Why is it assumed it's up to Meghan?