Does this look a ridiculous baby sling or is MM cack handed?

[Raspberry123]

This just looks really uncomfortable for MM and her son? Does she have it on right? I had one of those babybjorns and it seemed a lot of less strappy and one sided than this contraption?

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7909443/Meghan-beams-carrying-Archie-walking-dogs-Harry-boards-flight-Vancouver.html

They are not even handed. Anyone who is - for want of a better phrase - pro Meghan, and who questions, or disputes stuff that is quoted as fact, but so clearly isn't... is given very short shrift or the OP tells everyone repeatedly to ignore us as we are SCOLDS.

It is a bubble of posters who have it in for MM and nothing anyone says will make them listen to any other opinion.

That is not even handed in any way, shape or form.

The ongoing threads that are dominated by the coven are not even handed, no.

If libel were issued on this matter would it be to the poster who actioned it or to Mn for sanctioning it?

Firstly, M&H clearly aren’t strongly litigious. Threads on here about the McCanns (and certain others) are shut down so fucking fast.

Secondly, I can’t see how a poster would get sued. In practice anyway.

To be fair these threads seem to be pretty even sided

Eh? Eh?

Then three brand new usernames posted within the space of maybe 15 minutes all claiming to have been so outraged by what a nasty mean little liar I am that they were moved to register just to tell me so

This is what MN is encouraging by not being firmer with their moderating. There will be trolls out there circling around waiting to stick the boot in. I once moderated a forum and you had to do 50 posts before you were finally approved as a member to make sure you were legit.

But MN seems to want traffic. Any sort. Just numbers. Anyone can register, come on here, post shit or abusive posts and just go again. I'm on a FB group and everything I post has to be approved first. Now I know this site is too heavily populated for that but MN has gone too far the other way.

The abuse you had was awful joyful, I hope you weren't too affected by it.

Dignity and truthfulness are clearly issues with some plus fantasy and downright nastiness

@PortiaCastis - in libel action both the poster and Mn would be sued.

Why do posters comment when they have no evidence or facts. They aren’t posting that this is their opinion but they are claiming it as fact!

I haven't read the full thread so not sure if anyone else has said this ( I didn't get past the first few scrolls of bashing) and I normally stay away from MM threads for this reason.

I baby wear, woven usually.

I can start off with a perfect carry but as time goes on and as baby moves the carry can often end up looking messy.

Archies airway is clear and he looks comfy so I seriously see no issue. It's a tiny snippet that we see.

Archie may have been a bit grumpy and MM knew switching to that unconventional position would settle him.

Her baby her choice.

Thank you Parker and Laurie very interesting, I was also wondering about the laws regarding online hate speech be grateful if anyone could enlighten me.

No, you're awful

I'm not actually. Seriously how old are you

Thought provoking post, Rousette