Does this look a ridiculous baby sling or is MM cack handed?

[Raspberry123]

This just looks really uncomfortable for MM and her son? Does she have it on right? I had one of those babybjorns and it seemed a lot of less strappy and one sided than this contraption?

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7909443/Meghan-beams-carrying-Archie-walking-dogs-Harry-boards-flight-Vancouver.html

If she is bf that’s perfectly possible for a baby his age ! Breastmilk can be expressed and then you go back to feeding yourself when reunited with baby he’s not a newborn and it’s actually not that hard you just express and freeze or discard when not with baby to keep supply up

but surely you would just take the baby with you if you could

Well he's getting to the age where he'll be starting to get mobile so perhaps she'd rather not take him on two flights so close together! I went away for a conference at six months PP while breastfeeding and just pumped while away and my DD had expressed milk that I'd left behind.

But who cares if she's breastfeeding or not anyway! No one's business but her own.

I'm not surprised they don't want to be in the UK with so much drivel being posted about them.

I haven’t got a clue whether she’s bfing or not. And it’s neither here nor there.

But we can’t conclude that she isn’t because she left the baby for a few days. I did similar when my child was that age and pumped when I was away to keep supply up.

Archie is huge. If you have ever seen a properly slim and petite woman carry a big baby you will find most will hold their slings like that - otherwise they wouldn’t be able to see where they are going

, well, now it's only

I never said it was impossible, just not the most likely explanation. I am breastfeeding my own baby of a very similar age so I understand the issues - if I had to, I could leave him for a few days but if I had a nanny and free choice, I would take him with me.

It's more likely that she just didn't fasten her sling correctly

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51197099
Harry and Meghan issue legal warning over pictures

I’m more interested in the men who have to walk along 10 paces behind her on a dog walk. What a crap job.

So can we stop all the speculation that they were set up now? Thx.

I’m more interested in the men who have to walk along 10 paces behind her on a dog walk. What a crap job.

Yes, I bet it's them who pick up the dog's crap too.

I see they’re keeping up their war with the media.

Did nobody tell them it would be even worse once they were out of the protection of the royal family? I’m not defending this, but the gloves are off and they will not be able to control every image published of them. They seem to think they can.

I spose a crap job is a far better use of time than bitching on a forum all day

I disagree actually. I mean, neither is idea but I know which I’d prefer - if I had to do one.

I never said it was impossible, just not the most likely explanation.

Who knows and how significant is it really? The baby’s at a slight angle. So? 🤷‍♀️

Maybe it's them posting all these threads as payback.

It's more likely that she just didn't fasten her sling correctly

Yes, course it is
Let's not look on the positive side, after all this is Meghan we're talking about!

Yeah I noticed it looked weird. This wasn't a paparazzi moment though folks! It was clearly a set up piece Just like Diana often did. And thats why there's a tightrope to be walked when you do a deal with the media devil. You want media attention and then get peeved when they follow you around. There is something to be learnt from Diana's path.

Oh whoops I hadn't seen the BBC story about being spied on. As you were.

Well why is legal action being threatened

X post

The photos were taken without her consent - and that the photographer was hiding in the bushes and spying on her. Photographers have used long range lenses to try and get photos from inside the house and paparazzi were permanently camped outside their home.

Not acceptable by any element of the press.

As soon as I saw the picture I knew she'd be slated for it.... it's her baby I don't care how she holds it 🤷‍♀️

I said at the beginning of the thread as the paps were camped out there, there was no need to call them. It was silly to think otherwise,

They won't stop, because they are losing the protection of the royal privacy agreement that is in place.. All they've done is opened themselves up to more media intrusion. Way more. The media didn't publish the six week vacation pics last year because of that agreement. They loose that courtesy when they cease to be royals.

They can't afford to spend their life in court suing even media platform globally , so the legal warning is irrelevant.

As far as I'm concerned they should have known this would happen. The press intrusion would always get worse. The same as they should have known they couldn't work and still be royal when they pleased.

Honestly I'm starting to wonder what they are thinking, even the public know it's all fucking bonkers.

Why is it that when someone constantly involves themselves with someone else, basically stalks them, spreads false rumours and makes the subjects life unbearable, it would be classed as harassment. But the press have the free range to basically harass famous people every single day? Scumbags. And anyone who thinks this behaviour is ok needs to have a bloody good think.