19 kids and counting / safety

[MommyTVFan]

Hi
Followed Sue and Noel Radford and family on our tv programmes & see they have a new show on tomorrow (29/12/16).

Something I don't get is child safety in this and other larger families.

I mean I had 3 under 7 and I watch 2.5y old all the time, even when he is in older siblings room as there's bunk beds etc and even dressing up clothes can be dangerous

I know the Radford's have super high bunk beds and they always have around 4 kids under 6y I wonder how they supervise them? Or do you think kids like these and in other larger families are in hospital much more often ?

After the details I've put on here, it's not very hard for all the Radford stalkers to work out who I am!! Some probably already know........to post it here though, they'd have to admit they are on their fb pages and you are all cowards so I doubt anyone will....

six is the magic number sounds lovely! Nice to hear some positives of larger families too

Nobody cares that you are friends with people like that. Post your name before accusing everyone else of being cowardly. People don't care enough to find out who you are - everything you say could be total bollocks for all we know.

Are you always this odd?

Oh and feel free to report my post again

Don't ask me to post my name then?? Are you always this odd?? I wasn't even replying to you!!

Oh and feel free to jump in to someone else's conversation....again!!

Did I touch a nerve reporting your post??

It's hardly a private conversation. I think you may be a little confused as to how forums work.

You are the one ranting about people being cowards for not posting their names.

Didn't touch a nerve at all, I'm just wondering why all the other 'slanderous' posts weren't reported as well

You aren't exactly helping them with your rabid defence of them.

Still it has made me laugh on a dull morning

Yes me too! I can't beleive how sad you all are to take time out of your life to talk about a family you don't even like 👍😂

Ps. I didn't ask anyone to write their name!!

bizarre!

Is that you Sue?

Do they really lock the dcs in their bedrooms at night? I've don't remember that!

justanormalmummy you seem to have great difficulty in comprehending the laws of causality.

If someone puts info about something on the internet, it stays there. A quick google of the Radford family throws up approx 1,730,000 results. Within the first page I can find out the full names of the Radford children, their year of birth, the family's postcode (if you pay a couple of quid you can get their address and phone number) the financial report of their business. The majority of information has been volunteered by the Radfords through their family website, facebook page, twitter, newspaper/tv appearances and blogs. It is therefore astonishing that you think it is strange that people have knowledge about them, which the Radfords have put out there themselves. There is no need for anyone to stalk them, it is there as plain as day. Please try to understand this.

When you make the decision to expose your private life to the world you have to appreciate that some people will have a negative reaction. If they are offended by any opinions then advise them to remove themselves from the media, take down their website and quit social media and tv appearances. Sue also needs to remove identifying info when she posts in baby/birth groups.

I suggest that you save your hashtag rants for the sites that have sub-forums dedicated to slating them, which are sadly much nastier than anything you have read on here.

Wow, so much stupid in the past few pages.

justanormalmummy, a few things:

1. You're making yourself look like a twat.
2. Your 'friends' invited speculation into their lives when the sold their family to the public.
3. You understand how google works, right? That's how people can remember all the names.
4. To finish a sentence it's a full stop, not a flurry of exclamation points.

Incidentally, any opinion on her getting pregnant at 13 buy her partner who was an adult? Or is that swept under the rug in real life as well?

According to a thread on chat, Sue is pregnant again. At what point does an obstetrician sit them down and lay it out to them; the dangers of more pregnancies on her health and the risk to these babies. I've seen threads on the larger families forum here where mums were strongly advised to stop after 4, 5, and 6, because of the risk of PPH amongst other potential problems. They are absolutely reckless

I can't believe that there are people out there who defend and encourage them.

I feel sorry for Sue,

She was the victim of a sexual predator at a very young age. I wonder if she's ever had any counselling or therapy for that

Aha! Thread back again!

Ssssshhhhhh - don't wake the batshit person upthread....

Is she really pregnant again?

Someone started a thread a few days ago stating that she is on an online group with Sue and she apparently posted that she took 5/6 tests and it came back as 1-2 weeks pregnant. Whether that is true or not is another thing. If it is I'm sure there will be a big reveal and as usual they will express their shock at getting pregnant

Livia I find the whole thing really upsetting

Point taken though

There is definitely something wrong with a relationship between a 17 year old and a 13 year old. I can't see that having been acceptable at that time, I'm older than them both and it certainly isn't anything that would have been accepted in my (pretty lowly) circles back then.

I have a soon to be 17 year old, Not that he'd be the slightest interested in a child of 13, but it isn't a relationship I'd be allowing even as the parent of the 17 year old never mind as the parent of a 13 year old.

Obviously with the best will in the world, you can't stop stuff happening, but you can certainly be making it difficult and getting authorities involved too when and if required.