Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Xenophobia, homophonic, transphobia

451 replies

spstchmu · Today 01:52

Are you gonna do anything about it? Like, i know the line is that shoving the madness in the feminism board means it's not transphobia. And I know it's been done to death but I'm sick of it. It's not acceptable. Xenophobia, racism and homophobia also increasing.
And no. I won't leave. This is the biggest forum of its kind and it needs to represent and respect us all. And care that it's not.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
AnneElliott · Today 13:49

Glowingup · Today 08:23

There was lots of homophobia recently on the threads about the Preston Davey case, with some posters saying only heterosexual couples should be allowed to adopt children and some saying it was odd or a red flag for a gay male couple to want to adopt a child.

I read pretty much all of those threads and didn’t see anything like that. Posters had issues with single males or male couples adopting. No-one had issues with a lesbian couple or a single woman. That isn’t a homophobia issue - it’s a male violence issue.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · Today 13:53

Ereshkigalangcleg · Today 13:43

For someone who doesn’t want to discuss this any further, you’re spending quite a bit of time on your irrelevant comment about what type of changing room you personally prefer. Female changing rooms are for women and girls, not men, whether you use them or never set foot in them.

See also- ‘avoid these threads like the plague’.

Ereshkigalangcleg · Today 14:03

thisandthats · Today 08:55

agree.

I think it’s possible to be gender critical (common sense)

and also kind.

How should this “kindness” work then?

Differentforgirls · Today 14:26

AnneElliott · Today 13:49

I read pretty much all of those threads and didn’t see anything like that. Posters had issues with single males or male couples adopting. No-one had issues with a lesbian couple or a single woman. That isn’t a homophobia issue - it’s a male violence issue.

They should have.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-36016542

Attributing killing children to males is dangeous. This was two females.

Liam Fee

Liam Fee murder: Two women on trial over toddler son's death

Two women go trial at the High Court in Livingston charged with killing their two-year-old son at a house in Glenrothes in Fife.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-36016542

Ereshkigalangcleg · Today 14:27

callmeLoretta1 · Today 09:20

Safeguarding IS made on hypotheticals and 'worst case scenario', I'm afraid.

Very basic stuff, isn’t it? Still waiting for these no doubt extremely compelling arguments that will reassure and convince us that any man who says he is a woman should be considered one. Not heard one here yet, maybe I missed it though?

Differentforgirls · Today 14:29

AnneElliott · Today 13:49

I read pretty much all of those threads and didn’t see anything like that. Posters had issues with single males or male couples adopting. No-one had issues with a lesbian couple or a single woman. That isn’t a homophobia issue - it’s a male violence issue.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-36722114

Nyomi (left) and Rachel Fee murdered two-year-old Liam

Liam Fee: Mother and partner given life sentences

A mother is jailed for a minimum of more than 23 years and her civil partner for at least 24 years for the murder of her toddler son.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-36722114

Ereshkigalangcleg · Today 14:31

Yes, there are women who have committed horrific crimes. Many less than the amount of men though, regardless of gender identity.

Differentforgirls · Today 14:39

To TRY to get back to homophobia. There has been, understandably, outrage on here about Preston. That poor wee boy. 😪

But the narrative that only gay MEN kill babies is dangerous.

Hence my links about wee Liam Fee. Another poor wee soul.

Two women.

The homophobia about his death was pretty dangerous imo, because it makes people take their eye of the ball about abusive women.

You only need to see the threads on here about women having trauma for most of their lives due to how they were treated by their mother - including turning a blind eye to sexual abuse by their father.

So there was three phobias to discuss. Transphobia, Homophobia and Xenophobia.

Why are we only discussing one of the three?

AnneElliott · Today 14:46

Differentforgirls · Today 14:39

To TRY to get back to homophobia. There has been, understandably, outrage on here about Preston. That poor wee boy. 😪

But the narrative that only gay MEN kill babies is dangerous.

Hence my links about wee Liam Fee. Another poor wee soul.

Two women.

The homophobia about his death was pretty dangerous imo, because it makes people take their eye of the ball about abusive women.

You only need to see the threads on here about women having trauma for most of their lives due to how they were treated by their mother - including turning a blind eye to sexual abuse by their father.

So there was three phobias to discuss. Transphobia, Homophobia and Xenophobia.

Why are we only discussing one of the three?

But the point about the Preston threads is that is not homophobia? The objection some posters raised was about males adopting children - either single (therefore potentially straight) or male couples. How is that homophobia?

And no one says women don’t harm children (or other adults for that matter) but it’s at a vastly reduced rate to men. It’s why we teach children about safer adults - if they’re lost they’re told to find a police officer, someone in a shop wearing a uniform or a woman with children. That’s because those adults are statistically less likely to be predators.

ThonsDesperate · Today 14:48

Differentforgirls · Today 13:27

Read my posts and I have changed "vagina" to fanny. You knew what I meant though. No need for the condescention. Especially as I don't have an unhealthy obession with 0.1% of the population.

You are commanding me to read your posts, but I’m the one who’s condescending? You are stating that you don’t want to see women’s ‘vaginas’ in women’s changing rooms. The language you use is important, especially when you consider that women’s vaginas are tucked away where you can’t see them. Invisible. Indeed you’d be hard pressed to see their vulvas. Whereas men’s penises are dangling there for all to see. Potentially in women’s changing rooms.

Apparently 0.1% of the male population is 30,000. That’s a lot of potential penises. Too many to be hanging out in women’s changing rooms I reckon.

Differentforgirls · Today 14:50

AnneElliott · Today 14:46

But the point about the Preston threads is that is not homophobia? The objection some posters raised was about males adopting children - either single (therefore potentially straight) or male couples. How is that homophobia?

And no one says women don’t harm children (or other adults for that matter) but it’s at a vastly reduced rate to men. It’s why we teach children about safer adults - if they’re lost they’re told to find a police officer, someone in a shop wearing a uniform or a woman with children. That’s because those adults are statistically less likely to be predators.

Yes and teaching children that all women are safe is dangerous. Because not all women are safe.

Differentforgirls · Today 14:53

ThonsDesperate · Today 14:48

You are commanding me to read your posts, but I’m the one who’s condescending? You are stating that you don’t want to see women’s ‘vaginas’ in women’s changing rooms. The language you use is important, especially when you consider that women’s vaginas are tucked away where you can’t see them. Invisible. Indeed you’d be hard pressed to see their vulvas. Whereas men’s penises are dangling there for all to see. Potentially in women’s changing rooms.

Apparently 0.1% of the male population is 30,000. That’s a lot of potential penises. Too many to be hanging out in women’s changing rooms I reckon.

Edited

I do not wish to see your fanny.

GeneralPeter · Today 14:54

straighttola · Today 06:42

No, personally I’d just like for the obsession to be able to be called out every so often.

That’s the right way. Let people call out what they see as wrong, and we can all argue about it. Far, far better than heavy-handed moderation.

Meceme · Today 14:55

Differentforgirls · Today 14:50

Yes and teaching children that all women are safe is dangerous. Because not all women are safe.

That is quite true but statistically, at population level, women are safer than men.

Ereshkigalangcleg · Today 14:55

There is no “narrative that only gay men kill babies” on MN. Many posters (certainly not just FWR) are wary of adoptions of non verbal infants by men only, whether single men or couples. For safeguarding reasons. The point about surrogacy is that many of us believe surrogacy is wrong and should be illegal as it is in some other countries, regardless of the sex of those commissioning it. Obviously gay or single men can’t have babies themselves so they are affected. That pesky reality of sex rearing its head again! There’s a reason they don’t ask “trans women”, isn’t there?

AnneElliott · Today 14:57

Differentforgirls · Today 14:50

Yes and teaching children that all women are safe is dangerous. Because not all women are safe.

No one literally says all women are safe. But males are much more likely to commit sexual and violent crimes - are you saying you disagree with that position?

That was the basis of the comments on Baby Preston. Which isn’t in my view homophobia as it’s a position on males borne out by the evidence on offending rates. If you think it’s homophobia then you’ll need to explain why so when the posters had no issues with lesbian couples? Your previous post said they should (due to a high profile case of child cruelty) but heterosexual couples have also injured children in their care - so what’s your position - no adoption at all and they all stay in children’s homes?

Isitevensummer · Today 14:57

cannibalfish · Today 02:03

Absolutely agree. Mumsnet is rife with transphobia, racism and Islamophobia these days, it’s quite disheartening.

I do believe it is generational and will die out eventually though. I work with young people and holding these views will lead to being a social pariah.

It is also against the Mumsnet talk guidelines yet mods do nothing about it.

I also think there are clearly posters who are here to have arguments/stir things up, rather than actually engage with the topics of debate. I know we are not supposed to say there are trolls on here, but it is really obvious that there are.

Differentforgirls · Today 14:58

Meceme · Today 14:55

That is quite true but statistically, at population level, women are safer than men.

Statistics don’t matter to a dead child.

Ereshkigalangcleg · Today 15:00

Isitevensummer · Today 14:57

I also think there are clearly posters who are here to have arguments/stir things up, rather than actually engage with the topics of debate. I know we are not supposed to say there are trolls on here, but it is really obvious that there are.

Yes, plenty of them. We might disagree on who they are, I guess.

Differentforgirls · Today 15:00

AnneElliott · Today 14:57

No one literally says all women are safe. But males are much more likely to commit sexual and violent crimes - are you saying you disagree with that position?

That was the basis of the comments on Baby Preston. Which isn’t in my view homophobia as it’s a position on males borne out by the evidence on offending rates. If you think it’s homophobia then you’ll need to explain why so when the posters had no issues with lesbian couples? Your previous post said they should (due to a high profile case of child cruelty) but heterosexual couples have also injured children in their care - so what’s your position - no adoption at all and they all stay in children’s homes?

This has nothing to do with my post.

SkirlingGirl · Today 15:00

straighttola · Today 06:45

The thing is, it’s such a non issue in real life.

I am 99.99999% sure I work with a trans woman. It’s obviously impossible to actually know, and it’s not the type of thing you’d ask someone straight up. It doesn’t affect how she does her job, and she just wants to get on with her life. I can’t ever imagine being as angry about it as some people on here are. It’s so overblown.

Do you think women being forced to change in front of men - Sandie Peggie and the Darlington nurses for example - is a non-issue?

Differentforgirls · Today 15:02

Well I tried and we’re straight back to Sandie Peggy.

Ereshkigalangcleg · Today 15:10

Tried what? The overwhelming majority of posts from those you appear to agree with are about the perceived “transphobia” before anything else. It’s not GC people derailing the thread. You can’t expect to have (and to participate in) a thread laying into other women on MN and them not respond. Sorry and all.

Ereshkigalangcleg · Today 15:14

Sandie Peggie and the Darlington nurses (and others) were discriminated against in the workplace because they didn’t want to share a female only space with men. That’s the heart of why gender identity ideology is misogynistic and disregards and disrespects the feelings and needs of women and girls. Wholly relevant to why us boring non-cool women care about this issue so much.

Soontobe60 · Today 15:35

Lexibletheflexible · Today 09:55

So we've gone to flashing now. This is getting weird. I have a meeting at 10 about actual real female prisoners and their problems. I'll go get back to that .

Real female as opposed to pretend female!