I am utterly baffled by the people talking about him being "stopped" from doing what he wants, as though it's some unbelievable imposition on an adult father of three that he take people into consideration other than himself.
Lilyloo you asked "what would you say?" and I've been thinking about it, but I don't know because there is no way my DH would ever put me in the position your DP has with you.
However, this is how I would approach this situation if I were the one being offered this money. This is also how I would like to be treated if I were the one being expected to stay at home and do the childcare and chores for three weeks:
I would take the offer to my DH and discuss the following things in the order given -
- Could I actually accept this offer in the first place?
Personally I would have serious issues with accepting my sibling's money for a flight in these circumstances. I might accept my Dad paying for me to travel long haul to a funeral he wanted me to represent the family at. But I would not want my sister to pay for me to go to her wedding just because I was broke.
But say I overcame those scruples and decided I could say yes, that would lead to
- Can we afford this?
That means is there money available that can be spent on this without the rest of the family having to do without? My parents were skint my whole childhood. All the scrimping and saving that they did was for treats for us, their children. They never put treats for themselves anywhere high on the list of priorities, because they put us first.
I am really quite taken aback by the number of people that think that the parents of young children should prioritise treats and holidays for themselves above holidays for the kids. Especially when money is so tight.
Say we decided that we could afford it without anyone else doing without...
- What is the impact on DH?
People keep saying "my DH is a great Dad and so he deserves to do whatever he wants". Well my DH is a great dad too and he deserves not to be left for three weeks with no help if he doesn't feel up to it. And I expect to be treated equally in a marriage, so unless I'd be prepared to leave him I wouldn't expect to be left.
This conversation would take the form of him pushing me to go for longer and me reducing the time so as not to put too much work on his shoulders. There is no way I would push for the max and get in a sulk if he didn't agree. That is a horrible way to treat your partner.
So that is how it would be dealt with chez doodle. It sounds to me like you can't afford for him to go and if he does it will have detrimental effects for the rest of you. If being a good wife is about letting your husband shit all over the rest of the family so he can get his own way, then I guess I'd be a bad wife if I had a selfish husband.
As for "once in a lifetime opportunity"? Give me a break. Australia's not going anywhere. People travel there every day. He can go another time. They all can.