I have a question. It's trivial and a bit silly... but...
I am well aware of the fact that we should ignore tantrums and never give in to something that Q wants if he cries/shouts/tantrums because we've said "no" or not given it to him. I We do this - make sure he knows that crying isn't going to get him what he wants.
However, DH sometimes responds to it... and it makes me cringe.
But there are sometimes. Like tonight. DH had said "you can push the car button and make it go TWO more times, then it's bath time". Q stalled and stalled and pushed the car without pushing the button...etc. (he's really good at stalling bath/bedtime even though he's knackered). So I hadn't heard DH say about the 2 more times and Q was starting to fade and show obvious signs of being tired and I said, "ok, bathtime." He burst into tears and cried and cried and sobbed "I just want to play with the car".... DH said "I did say he could have 2 more times to push the button on the car".
At that point, Dh thought it was unfair for me to take him away to the bath because he had been promised his 2 turns. I felt I had said bathtime, so I was going to bring him and I didn't want him getting his way after throwing his little tantrum about it because in his mind, he'd think "I screamed and got my own way".... right?
DH thinks he can understand that we would have been letting him do it because he was promised the 2 times initially. I disagree, I think... now I"m not sure.
What do you think? Told you it's a bit silly, but this sort of thing comes up a lot and I'm not sure how to tackle it. I don't think DH is sure, either. We want to be fair to him and not go against our word... but we also don't want him thinking that turning on the waterworks gets him his own way. 
Ignore me if you think I'm just pfb and crap at parenting.