Trump (Part 7)

[claig]

Even more Trump.

There may be 4 years of this.
Try to keep it lighthearted and not snide, please.
It's Christmas.

'But, if you want banter style, then don't complain when you get it.'

I love banter and serious discussion which is why the 20 Trump threads are full of both. I don't like personal attacks on any poster, which I think is part of MNHQ's guidelines, but I don't know because i have never read them as I intrinsically abide by them

This also in

Kellyanne Conway. First ever woman to successfully win a presidential campaign and who got bullied by feminists is moving to Washington to keep working for Trump

www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/20/conway-to-move-to-washington-keep-working-for-trump.html??!

Misss

What was the information here?

Pantsuit Nation in turmoil after book deal. Feminist Hillary 'teh shill' supporters are upset and feeling betrayed. Looks like the left can't resist hurting one another

Pantsuit Nation are in turmoil because of a book deal somewhere. What book deal?
How has the left hurt one another? How do they feel betrayed? Why are they upset?

Answers to those questions, or a link, would have been informative. As it stands, your post is just throwing a snide comment at the left.

'If you repeatedly use, say, "Blairites" as a term of abuse, attacking Blairites in general, and then repeatedly call a particular poster a Blairite, that would have to be a personal attack, wouldn't it?'

Not at all. Some of teh 172 are proud Blairites and that is not an insult. Unlike them, I am a proud Trump fan and that is the highest accolade.

Attacks on Trump fans, in general, are fine. And then saying that posters are Trump fans, as I proudly am, is no problem at all.

Bullied, misswatch? are you quite sure about that?

And why are feminists crying because Trump won? Is it because they know that women's rights are a t risk?

Strange thing to say, Claig when you have also repeatedly attacked "the 172"

'your post is just throwing a snide comment at the left.'

Snide comments at the left and Blair are entirely within the spirit of a Trump thread (and some would say are de rigueur, and yes I googled it because I was about to spell it as de rigger) as are snide comments about the right and Trump, because neither are personal attacks on a poster

Women's rights are not at risk. Typical feminist hysteria

"And why are feminists crying because Trump won? Is it because they know that women's rights are a t risk?"

Yes. It is a very odd thing to be celebrating.

Not celebrating, just pointing out that these 'strong' and 'independent' women are anything but

'Claig when you have also repeatedly attacked "the 172"'

Absolutely, the 172 are even worse than Blair. This is not a politically correct thread, this is a Trump thread in the Age of Trump and every poster is allowed and encouraged to take the piss out of the political class, the great and the good and the metropolitan elite.

Trump's victory was "the bigget Fuck You ever recorded in human history" as left winger Michael Moore reluctantly admitted and the people have won the right and Trump's approval to take the piss out of their political class without fear of Blairite reprisal and recrimination.

We the people beat Big Brother, his DNA databases and his biometric Blairite ID cards and all his politically correct "servants extraordinaire".

We are now allowed to laugh long and loud and play the song "Ain't No Stopping Us Now" as loud as we like, just as the Legendary Laugh was heard all around the world when Trump beat the elites in the year of 2016

"Typical feminist hysteria"

Is this a personal attack? Or just bants?

More liberals buying guns
So now they suddenly like the second amendment? Make your minds up.

To start with, liberals in general don't dislike the second amendment, as such. But the left (or liberals, which may not exist, as it's an elite fabrication, apparently - and this is in keeping up with claig's explanations - in seriousness - but, ok, I'll go with your liberals) do call for more gun ownership restrictions, because privately owned guns cause more deaths than they prevent.

Anyway, you don't know if those liberals were that opposed to the second amendment, although from the news piece they are reluctantly learning how to shoot. So, not happy about it.
Probably like I have reluctantly learnt self-defence. It's not something that I really want to use ever, or intend to use it for attacking anyone, but knowing how to use it could save my life at some point.

Then, I take it as a sign that they are worried about what will happen to society under a Trump administration.

It's a sad arms race when more and more people arm themselves. It could become a gunpowder barrel.

Finally, it doesn't really match your earlier description of snowflake liberals (or feminists) wanting to resolve all serious violence related problems and conflicts by talking, does it?

In all seriousness.

Quite Claig, so your last post referring to the 172 made no sense, and you do indeed use the word Blairite as a term of abuse. A bizarre and anachronistic one admittedly.

Not celebrating, just pointing out that these 'strong' and 'independent' women are anything but

Are you saying that crying is a sign of weakness?

So, if men cry after losing a football game are they weak and dependent?

Chances are they are buying guns but will wet their pants if they had to use one

Misswatch you need to stop watching those videos.

Football fans cry because of their passion for the game. I've known WoW players to cry after beating C'thun. It's all passion. Feminists why cry about stuff simply want men to do work for them

Chances are they are buying guns but will wet their pants if they had to use one

Again, is this supposed to elevate the debate?

Again, is this supposed to elevate the debate?

You could use your MMA ninja skillz if you think im not elevating the debate

Football fans cry because of their passion for the game. I've known WoW players to cry after beating C'thun. It's all passion. Feminists why cry about stuff simply want men to do work for them

And this?

Do you seriously believe what you wrote about feminists?
Don't you think that the women (I presume feminists) who cried when Hillary lost could possibly be passionate about the campaign?

I'm starting to build up an interesting picture of how you think women should be misswatch. They are bad if they buy guns, but only if they don't use them. They're bad if they bully, but also bad if they cry. But good if they're crying because they lost a game that they liked, but bad if they are crying because they've just seen their country delivered into the hands of a sociopathic billionaire with a history of sexual assault backed by a foreign power. Have I missed anything?

You could use your MMA ninja skillz if you think im not elevating the debate

Well, clearly you don't want debate, just snide comments and personal attacks.

In all seriousness.

I could reply with banter, or a snide comment back, but no.

It's hysteria. You and many feminists, SJW's etc genuinely believe Trump is the nightmare monster from kids books who will destroy the world, legalise rape, nuke everywhere and keep women barefoot and pregnant