nicky
you jumped on and in your first post started with the my partners exbitch.
thats the sort of thing fairly likly to put peoples backs up, she is the mother of his child/children obviously they are no longer togather but refering to the mother of your step child/children as the exbitch is childish offensive and pathetic.
you then made a comment about most women with 50 50 care abuse the csa - compleatly forgetting that the csa reduce payable maintainance for nrp's dependant on how many nights they have the child/children for.
you then made a few coments about how if its a womans choice to have a baby she should pay or it thus implying that if she uses the csa shes a scrounger.
several of the rinse a bloke gold digger coments - that were most certainly not clearly aimed at one person (the one you know) and to most people reading them looked very much like you were refering to the people who had posted on the thread,or csa claiments in genral.ou
at no time have you given any actual real factual constructive information regading csa or child maintainance you made a attempt to do so but your info was actually incorrect.
a poster kindly attempted to provide you with some real information regarding births in a fairly obviously attempt to furnish you with info that provided insight into the distinct lack of sperm theft related births by gold diggers just attempting to abuse and steal from nrp's. but you attempted to rip that apart (extreamly badly must try harder next time)
you consistantly implyed that posters who use csa either didnt support there own children - incidently would it surprise you to learn that the vast majority of csa claiments recive either nothing or the £5pw current minimum assesment.
or they didnt work i belive that going by dwp's figures more lone parents are in work than not.
and that women use csa to punish men, you do know the csa only take 15% for 1 kid dont you?
how is it punishment to pay a set reasonable % of your income that is reduced to reflect how many nights you have your child to stay then further reduced if you have other children residing with you and can be further reduced if you have to travel a significant distance to collect your kids and will change every time your income does?
its only punishment if you dont want to pay the % that gets reduced to accomadate your circumstances, towards the maintaining of children that you produced before you started a new life - that does not make you a victim of pwc/csa punishment it makes you a feckless irrisponsable twat.