I agree about releasing data.
I just think, seeing the huge amount of issue re doing the same thing for other vaccines, that the picture won’t be the true picture anyway so it will used to defend agendas instead 🤷♀️🤷♀️
What I mean by that is that doctors are generally vey reticent in acknowledging someone has had a reaction to the vaccine unless it happens there and then and is pretty obvious.
So they don’t generally fill the Yellow Card to report them. Any issue is put down as ‘one r those things’, coincidence etc….
Then there is issue with diagnostic. I developed daily headaches just after the vax. Not relieved by painkillers. It’s only after doing my own research, seeing a cardiologist privately etc… that I was diagnosed with POTS. And yes treating POTS helped with those headaches. But it took months to get a diagnosis and for me to make the link. It’s unlikely to accepted as a ‘negative outcome’ from the vax iyswim.
It is an issue with all vaccines though and is very well known. The fact negative outcome is under reported is both a cultural (with medics) and political (we want people to be vaccinated) issue.
I fear that concentrating on the % of negative outcome will only be used to other ends because of that.