Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Relative still shielding from covid

218 replies

Worriedabouttheworried · 20/03/2023 11:53

Without wanting to give away too many specifics I have a relative (early 40s) who is still shielding from covid. This means not going anywhere apart from an occasional walk to the park, and does not include meeting people in the park as this is seen as too risky (they don't have a garden). They live with someone who feels the same, and have built a shared narrative, where, it seems to me, they feed into each other's anxieties and justifications about why this is a reasonable choice. Perhaps it is a reasonable choice and I am being unreasonable.

They both work from home, but on short term contracts, so there's a worry about getting ill and the financial insecurity that may bring. They also have pretty bad asthma. The one time they did step out of their comfort zone they unluckily caught covid, and were pretty ill (needing steroids from GP but not hospitalisation). This has definitely increased the risk perception and magnified the justification that they are doing the right thing.

I'm so concerned about their mental health and the long term trajectory of this. I realise it's their life to lead, and really it's got nothing to do with me, but I care about them and cannot see an end to this way of life for them. There's talk of eg 'when I get another booster I might feel more comfortable', but after the booster or whatever there's always another reason not to change anything. They talk about being prepared to live like this for years if necessary.

It's such a difficult thing to be on the sidelines of. I really feel they'd benefit from talking to a counsellor (via zoom) but don't think they'd do it if I suggested it. They already perceive me as belittling their choices (because I've tried to raise it, which makes them very defensive) and possibly as acting irresponsibly by going out and about.

Has anyone been through similar? Does anyone have any recommendations for online counsellors who might specialise in this, or other advice? For those of you who are GPs etc what do you suggest when you encounter this?

I'm trying to just step back but feel like their reasoning has become so skewed. Maybe I'm the one who needs to talk to a counsellor about this to find a way to cope with the potentially unchangeable.

OP posts:
Dodie66 · 23/03/2023 14:13

Why does it bother you that they are living this way? Does it impact on your life at all?
we live in a similar way and are quite happy. We do our own thing. Both have health problems too. Why do you assume it will cause mental health problems? Some people like avoiding people and situations and live a more reclusive life.

TheDailyCarbunkle · 23/03/2023 15:12

UnmentionedElephantDildo · 23/03/2023 10:36

is there a point where people who are continuing to shield will consider it safe to stop shielding? Will they shield for the rest of their lives?

That rather depends on whether the government will fund Evusheld on the NHS. That would put even the critically vulnerable on the same footing as the rest of the population.

Otherwise, yes, some people - whose lives were not like this before Covid - remain as vulnerable as were all were in the first weeks. That might be a life-long condition (eg if you have received a transplant) or have certain autoimmune diseases ot a chronic cancer. For others it would be for a number of years (eg during cancer treatment and for a buffer period afterwards)

When perhaps there are new, more and more effective anti-virals, that might also mean it would be like the time before this virus emerged. There was always a risk of a disease taking a more severe form, but the differences in availability and effectiveness of treatments meant that shielding was not required, but covid just doesn't fit in that category just yet

Thank you for this answer @UnmentionedElephantDildo - it makes sense. I wasn't aware that people were waiting for better treatments etc. Is there evidence that those treatments are being developed? Is there a sense when they might be available?

It concerns me that there may be people who spend years limiting their lives only to find that nothing really changes. It'd be awful for someone to avoid doing things they want to do, seeing people they want to see, in the hopes of treatment that never comes. They may avoid covid but they can't necessarily avoid other disease risks - they may never get the chance to be among friends and family again. I find that very sad - I know others are not bothered by it, but that's not how I feel.

TheDailyCarbunkle · 23/03/2023 15:13

Dodie66 · 23/03/2023 14:13

Why does it bother you that they are living this way? Does it impact on your life at all?
we live in a similar way and are quite happy. We do our own thing. Both have health problems too. Why do you assume it will cause mental health problems? Some people like avoiding people and situations and live a more reclusive life.

Some people actually like being among their relatives and miss people when they don't get to spend time with them. Shocking, I know.

Worriedabouttheworried · 23/03/2023 17:21

Dottyandbetty · 23/03/2023 14:08

@Worriedabouttheworried I’m glad to have been able to offer some help. I’m sorry your thread got a bit derailed. You sound like a lovely kind and supportive relative, I hope that in time you’re able to see your relative face to face again. In the meantime keep being that person who shows up, as I’m sure that’s hugely appreciated.

Thank you. Your experience has been so useful to hear.

OP posts:
Sugarplumfairy65 · 23/03/2023 20:58

TheDailyCarbunkle · 23/03/2023 15:12

Thank you for this answer @UnmentionedElephantDildo - it makes sense. I wasn't aware that people were waiting for better treatments etc. Is there evidence that those treatments are being developed? Is there a sense when they might be available?

It concerns me that there may be people who spend years limiting their lives only to find that nothing really changes. It'd be awful for someone to avoid doing things they want to do, seeing people they want to see, in the hopes of treatment that never comes. They may avoid covid but they can't necessarily avoid other disease risks - they may never get the chance to be among friends and family again. I find that very sad - I know others are not bothered by it, but that's not how I feel.

An effective treatment is already available, in fact most other countries have already provided their cev citizens with it. The NHS refuses to fund it though despite clinical findings showing that it works. It's called Evusheld

milkyaqua · 23/03/2023 22:19

Lovestodrinkmilk · 20/03/2023 13:14

Leave them alone. Live your life the way you want to and let them do the same. Just because someone has different views about how to live and what they want to do doesn't make them mentally ill.

Exactly. As for the "helpful" suggestions of CBT, I would think the OP and others of similar mind who are wanting to bully others (out of concern) into unwanted socialising during an ongoing pandemic could look into that.

shinynewapple22 · 23/03/2023 22:46

finalwhistle · 20/03/2023 13:43

Someone I know who's in their early 50's and lives with their mother (70's) hasn't left the house since March 2020.

They both suffer from anxiety but no physical conditions that would make them vulnerable, and admittedly they didn't go out much before but I'd see them walking round town/shopping etc.

Now they go nowhere. House is all shut up, never seem to have the windows open, get food delivered, live on benefits.

This sounds similar to a friend of mine, although her mum was very elderly and quite frail . Her mum passed away a few months back and my friend has really struggled with getting back into normal activity - not just because of fear around Covid but because she is just not used to being around groups if people and crowded spaces, I think it's been a sort of sensory overload for her . In a way I think she's actually been helped by getting Covid and realising that it wasn't the life sentence she expected and is now more relaxed .

GoldenAye · 24/03/2023 00:22

@TheDailyCarbunkle

It concerns me that there may be people who spend years limiting their lives only to find that nothing really changes. It'd be awful for someone to avoid doing things they want to do, seeing people they want to see, in the hopes of treatment that never comes. They may avoid covid but they can't necessarily avoid other disease risks - they may never get the chance to be among friends and family again. I find that very sad - I know others are not bothered by it, but that's not how I feel.

"Concerned" are you? I simply don't think you understand the risk Covid presents to particular groups. My brother with Stage IV cancer only just survived his recent bout with Covid. He has no immune system due to having had a bone marrow transplant and chemo. He was pissing blood. So thanks for your "concern", but I'd thought I'd illustrate for you why some people wish to avoid Covid.

Crikeyalmighty · 24/03/2023 01:08

@Worriedabouttheworried I'm sorry some people seem to have gone well over the top in what I feel was

Crikeyalmighty · 24/03/2023 01:20

Genuine concern. You even said AIBU. I don't think this is all about health- from what you said about terrorism etc it sounds like they are just very very anxious people. I think you just have to let them get on with it- which is sad for you- I see that.

On the other hand I don't think it gives people the right to be amazingly rude to you because they themselves have issues. I've developed bad neurological stuff post vaccines. I feel mentally whacked somewhat because I've never had a chronic condition before and I'm certainly not wanting further doses of it but am carrying on as normal because otherwise I would go nuts. I think you are bearing the brunt of some peoples frustrations and depression with chronic illness. If they want to protect themselves that's fine- but it's not ok to take frustrations out on others.

milkyaqua · 24/03/2023 02:58

If they want to protect themselves that's fine-

But this whole thread, including the opening post, is all about pathologising people are want to protect themselves, and people who are more introverted.

milkyaqua · 24/03/2023 03:01

are = who

110APiccadilly · 24/03/2023 06:06

YetMoreNewBeginnings · 21/03/2023 22:47

I find it extraordinary that so many people feel so entitled to decide what level of risk should be acceptable for someone else.

It comes from all the months and months when the government felt entitled to decide what level of risk we could all take. Now people are infantilsed about it. Just one more insidious adverse consequence from lockdown.

UnmentionedElephantDildo · 24/03/2023 06:43

Sugarplumfairy65 · 23/03/2023 20:58

An effective treatment is already available, in fact most other countries have already provided their cev citizens with it. The NHS refuses to fund it though despite clinical findings showing that it works. It's called Evusheld

Agree - the refusal to fund Evusheld (even when the manufacturers were offering a "money back if not effective enough" price guarantee) was one of the most heartless decisions this government has ever made.

It's a disgrace - no other country that has announced a decision has rejected it. It's even free to the IC in the USA

pixie5121 · 24/03/2023 08:39

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request.

pixie5121 · 24/03/2023 08:48

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request.

BlueSeaWave · 24/03/2023 08:55

YetMoreNewBeginnings · 22/03/2023 00:24

The respect is the key.

My DD is just out of hospital because another parent decided that it was “too upsetting” for her child if my DD didn’t attend her birthday meal.

So lied. To my face. No coughs. No colds. No bugs. They’ve had a very quiet week and all did covid tests (I paid for - I always do) which came back clear.

Except her DD was showing symptoms so they didn’t test. And she had covid, they tested upon getting home. And so risked my DD who everyone knows has no immunity despite catching it multiple times (vaccines gave no immunity either). She ended up in hospital for 15 days. Thankfully it was mild (comparatively) so this time didn’t involve CPR or extended icu stay.

But apparently life is for living and her DD is entitled to live normally…

That never ever happened pre-covid. People were so, so respectful.

Now they’re all Dr Google and know better. And if they don’t their wishes/their child’s wishes trump ours.

This is so fucking awful I am so sorry. I hope that parent knows what they did and everyone around the em knows too. People have changed and don’t understand the “life is for living” bullshit doesn’t apply to some people like your DD. We have a similar family situation and it was the brother and his wife who decided their need for a night out knowing mg they likely had covid was worth sending their kids to someone who could die of a cold and gave them covid and they’re still really ill. They don’t test as they don’t need too. As they’re fine. Fuckers.

i Hope that person who knowingly gave your DD covid is no longer included in your life and you told them why

TheDailyCarbunkle · 24/03/2023 09:18

GoldenAye · 24/03/2023 00:22

@TheDailyCarbunkle

It concerns me that there may be people who spend years limiting their lives only to find that nothing really changes. It'd be awful for someone to avoid doing things they want to do, seeing people they want to see, in the hopes of treatment that never comes. They may avoid covid but they can't necessarily avoid other disease risks - they may never get the chance to be among friends and family again. I find that very sad - I know others are not bothered by it, but that's not how I feel.

"Concerned" are you? I simply don't think you understand the risk Covid presents to particular groups. My brother with Stage IV cancer only just survived his recent bout with Covid. He has no immune system due to having had a bone marrow transplant and chemo. He was pissing blood. So thanks for your "concern", but I'd thought I'd illustrate for you why some people wish to avoid Covid.

You're talking about someone who is severely ill - it makes sense for someone who is so vulnerable to protect themselves from all infections and it's likely they would have done that in 2019 as much as they would do it now.

You surely see the difference between someone who has stage IV cancer protecting themselves from infections and someone who is generally healthy stopping pretty much all contact with their family and friends?

TheDailyCarbunkle · 24/03/2023 09:19

This reply has been deleted

Withdrawn at poster's request.

Yes, I think people are wrong to isolate themselves and I worry that they will realise that it's wrong too late.

You don't have to agree with me.

pixie5121 · 24/03/2023 09:25

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request.

Dottyandbetty · 24/03/2023 09:25

This reply has been deleted

Withdrawn at poster's request.

However you’ve continually attacked posters who even dare to offer a differing view point to your own, even those such as me who acknowledge that there are various approaches and no right or wrong.

Yet you spout that anyone with a differing opinion refuses to take the most basic of measures and are continually rude and confrontational to other posters, completely missing the irony.

It suits your narrative to pass everyone else off as not giving a damn about others. I tested my child for a the most minor, occasional cough, discovered they were positive and then kept my child who was well in them self at home to protect others despite school advising that if they were well in themself they could go in and only sent them back once they have a negative test. Yet it doesn’t suit your narrative to acknowledge that people can have contrasting and varying view points and still care about and protect others. Not to mention your constant derailing of threads. There’s no need to be rude or vicious towards other posters.

TheDailyCarbunkle · 24/03/2023 09:29

This reply has been deleted

Withdrawn at poster's request.

The OP doesn't need CBT to prevent her being worried about people she cares about, because that's what's called normal behaviour. Having an opinion is also normal.

Rainbowsandbutterflies1990 · 24/03/2023 09:30

milkyaqua · 21/03/2023 01:51

They both work from home, but on short term contracts, so there's a worry about getting ill and the financial insecurity that may bring. They also have pretty bad asthma. The one time they did step out of their comfort zone they unluckily caught covid, and were pretty ill (needing steroids from GP but not hospitalisation). This has definitely increased the risk perception and magnified the justification that they are doing the right thing.

They are doing the right thing. Those suggesting otherwise are mercifully lucky to not experience a severe asthma attack, brought on by viral infection or otherwise. Seems to be an empathy deficit, imagination deficit, and common sense deficit in those suggesting their behaviour is "agoraphobia" or some other mental health condition requiring intervention. No. The pandemic is not over.

They r not doing the right thing. They have never been told to sheild. So they r not needing to shield. I have asthma and have severe asthma attack before and ended up in intensive care. Before covid. I am doing everything I was doing pre covid. I would say it is agoraphobia. Covid is still out there obviously but the risks r lower and I've honestly found it bizarre some of the replies.

UnmentionedElephantDildo · 24/03/2023 09:30

TheDailyCarbunkle · 24/03/2023 09:21

Nice doesn't recommend Evusheld as they believe it's unlikely to prevent infection against current variants:

That is true now and Evusheld2 is in clinical trials

However, when MHRA approved it last spring it was higly effective, and indeed remained so until well in to the autumn/winter

The IC could have months of their lives back if the government had funded it last spring (when other countries did) rather than, uniquely, asking for additional trials (still not concluded) into efficiency, and ignoring the large body of international evidence.

Those extra trials BTW were not a sound reason to delay, because the manufacturer would refund the drug cost if effectiveness (at the time it was given) was not adequate. So it was a one-way bet for the government.

But instead they chose the heartless way. Condemning between 0.5 and 1.5 people to continuing a precautionary life, over most of last year.

It could have been so different