@wintertravel1980
ok, hope you don't mind a few questions
- what ages do you classify as children? I have a teen in gcse year, so when I say children I refer automatically to older teens. And it has been shown that there is a difference in small kids and teens. So I think it would be important to clarify who we are talking about (yes, I should take my own advice, sorry for not stating it)
- Children are less likely to scream at school ok, valid on the concert part. On the other hand they have assemblies 2x a week and singing all together at least once a week. That is 2-400 kids singing at once on a regular basis. And they have all yeargroup games sessions once a week.
- interaction: not sure I agree with you there totally, but see your point.
- Leicester. I am not convinced that this is a valid fact. I am not basing this on facts and can only hope that someone (boys3 maybe) can put me in my place. It can be because 1 week is not enough to start creating the spike, maybe the testing level is lower and the willingness to test is lower. to rephrase: I would like to know if there are other factors potentially masking what is happening.* Hope not.
I do see an oxymoron in your reasoning though
children get infected less vs many had covid
If they don't get infected less why have so many already had covid?
to me both statements feel more emotion based than fact. (caveat: not up to date with data, so feel free to correct me)
*actually this frustrates me a lot. The level of trust towards reporting bodies (media, phe,...) in my case is very low. They have proven over and over again how they twist facts to suit the gov narrative regardless of what is happening. I wish it wasn't so.