You need to know more than just there were 29 deaths in that age range after taking the vaccine.
What numbers had the vaccine? A bit different if it was 29/50 than if it was 29/10 000.
Who were they giving it to? If they gave it to their frailest first that is different demographics than the healthiest groups.
What numbers would you expect to die from that demographic if they hadn't had the vaccine?
For example. A GP I know was involved in a "huge numbers of deaths after poisoning at care home" scandal. It hit the national news and people were calling for enquiries, and families were speaking to papers etc.
Not once was it mentioned that this was a care home for people who were terminally ill. The people that went there had a life expectancy of less than 6 months.
Of the residents who died over that time only one had had the food poisoning.
The press seized on it and had a field day obsessing over how they'd "killed" the residents.
In order to make any comment on it you need to know a lot more, and I notice this from the article:
More than 20 000 doses of the vaccine have been administered over the past few weeks in Norway and around 400 deaths normally occur among care home residents every week.
So the percentage who died after the vaccine, if the vaccine did cause the death is 0.145%. Bearing in mind that it states they were very elderly and frail, then that's definitely a better rate than if they catch covid.