Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

“Covid marshals to be introduced”

638 replies

Funkypolar · 09/09/2020 16:51

To enforce social distancing.

No doubt they will find many volunteers on Mumsnet!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
loulouljh · 09/09/2020 16:53

What lovely individuals they will be!!!!

SeekingCoffee33 · 09/09/2020 16:53

Yes that announcement made my skin crawl a bit.

Blue565 · 09/09/2020 16:53

They will make parking attendants seem practically popular

Nestme · 09/09/2020 16:53

yes that sent 1984 shivers down my spine.

LizzieSiddal · 09/09/2020 16:54

I expect they mean in pubs etc.

Blue565 · 09/09/2020 16:54

@Nestme

yes that sent 1984 shivers down my spine.
Yes, 100% this. Seemingly random people given actual fining powers?
Funkypolar · 09/09/2020 16:54

Oh I can imagine people in high vis jackets coming round knocking on the door...

OP posts:
IceCreamAndCandyfloss · 09/09/2020 16:59

Surely it’s good thing as those not complying affect others. No issue if people stick to the rules/guidance. The vulnerable can do more things when SD is adhered too.

Waxonwaxoff0 · 09/09/2020 16:59

Police state. Terrifying.

LizzieSiddal · 09/09/2020 17:00

Well if people are breaking the laws, then Marshall’s should be knocking in their door.

If everyone just followed the rules- wash your hands and most importantly keep 2 metres away from everyone, the virus would die out pretty quickly. It’s people’s (Mostly young people) inability to do this which is causing these new rules.

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 09/09/2020 17:01

@IceCreamAndCandyfloss

Surely it’s good thing as those not complying affect others. No issue if people stick to the rules/guidance. The vulnerable can do more things when SD is adhered too.
I don't want to live in a police state thank you and that's the way this is heading.
Funkypolar · 09/09/2020 17:02

Next they’ll be ordering us to wear masks in our home and sending marshals door to door. Just you wait and see...

OP posts:
RainbowParadise · 09/09/2020 17:03

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Blue565 · 09/09/2020 17:03

It's like the Benjamin Franklin quote "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

Although that's exceptionally dramatic

DurhamDurham · 09/09/2020 17:03

My next door neighbour will be in his element. He was timing us all when we went out for walks at the start of lockdown. He was trying to impose his own belief that we had to be back in an hour.

RufustheSniggeringReindeer · 09/09/2020 17:03

Oh joy 😒

BamboozledandBefuddled · 09/09/2020 17:04

@RainbowParadise

They should have the guts to call it what it actually is. The gestapo
Yes, that would be honest.
RufustheSniggeringReindeer · 09/09/2020 17:04

durham

Did you stay out for an hour and 5 minutes just to fuck with him?

AlecTrevelyan006 · 09/09/2020 17:05

The PM says: "I'm still hopeful, as I've said before, that in many ways we could be able to get some aspects of our lives back to normal by Christmas."

He says he hopes that people will be able to take "a rapid turnaround test" in the morning and know 15 minutes later whether they are infectious or not.

"That gives you a kind of passport... to mingle with everybody else who is similarly not infectious in a way that is currently impossible," he says, adding that this is what the government is "aiming for".

...

we really are heading for an Orwellian future

TheDailyCarbuncle · 09/09/2020 17:06

@LizzieSiddal

Well if people are breaking the laws, then Marshall’s should be knocking in their door.

If everyone just followed the rules- wash your hands and most importantly keep 2 metres away from everyone, the virus would die out pretty quickly. It’s people’s (Mostly young people) inability to do this which is causing these new rules.

This is total and utter bollocks. The most likely place for a vulnerable person has always been in hospital (or a care home, originally, though that's less of a problem now). To get a virus that has spread to millions and millions of people all over the world to 'die out' would require nailing everyone into their homes - the virus would die out because people would die out. Even the strictest lockdown can't completely control a highly infectious illness with inconsistent symptoms that is everywhere in the community, it's just not possible.
TheDailyCarbuncle · 09/09/2020 17:06

Sorry that should 'the most likely place for a vulnerable person to be infected'

feelingverylazytoday · 09/09/2020 17:07

@RainbowParadise

They should have the guts to call it what it actually is. The gestapo
Don't be fucking ridiculous. Do you know what the gestapo actually did?
loulouljh · 09/09/2020 17:07

It is very seriously worrying..those people following this blindly thinking its for their own good-it is not. Please wake up and be worried.

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 09/09/2020 17:07

@Funkypolar

Next they’ll be ordering us to wear masks in our home and sending marshals door to door. Just you wait and see...
I did read an article a while ago where some idiot recommended wearing a mask and socially distancing in your home.

I'm waiting for quarantine 'camps' for want of a better description.

ChickenwingChickenwing · 09/09/2020 17:09

If people didn't ignore the rules it wouldn't be needed.