Again, No real discussion on the points I’ve made on here this morning- just picking fights.
I commented (to SharonEllis):
Just going to tactically ignore this then are we?
If it’s not about the hostages the only “justification” left is Hamas. Yet international law is clear: civilians, especially children, cannot be deliberately targeted to get at a military group. Starving, bombing, and flattening entire neighbourhoods (even farmland) to pressure/punish Hamas is illegal. Repeated, systematic attacks on civilians are war crimes- and possibly genocide. Targeting Hamas doesn’t magically make mass civilian slaughter lawful.
SharonEllis commented (to me):
It’s not me that ignoring things. You keep repeating that Netayahu is to blame for rejecting ceasefires, as if Hamas was being reasonable. You can't just ignore the fact that Israel will not, and should not be expected to, allow Hamas to remain armed and functioning.
You commented (to SharonEllis):
Yes very much an implication that Hamas are being the more reasonable ones here.
Hamas apologists do not use valid arguments. They are a proscribed terrorist organisation in the UK.
I commented:
Accusing me of being a Hamas apologist for pointing out facts is absurd.
Netanyahu has repeatedly rejected peace deals, and international law is clear: Israel must distinguish civilians from fighters. Deliberately killing hundreds of thousands of children under five cannot be justified as self-defence