The thread was asking why the huge humanitarian crisis in Sudan appears to be largely ignored when compared to how much air time other countries receive. It is certainly true that some receive more air time, attention, demonstrations etc than others.
Unfortunately, as usual, this means insults, deflecting and anything but an answer that might explain that. Quite a few comments were deleted so I assume that they were reported as breaching guidelines.
Anyway, some useful information shared, and I see another poster managed to get a thread up and running afterwards, also sharing information and hopefully that isn't derailed or sabotaged. There is room for discussion on more than one conflict on the CITME threads. I just avoid threads that I'm not interested in and I wish others would do the same. Within the other thread a poster made incorrect comments about what this thread was about and I chose not to answer this since I don't want to derail that thread by addressing it. I feel so sad for the innocents in all conflicts and a bit moreso for those largely ignored for various reasons.
There are many reasons why some conflicts gain more sympathy, publicly, protests etc, than others. A range of reasons, (not exhaustive) ranging from IMO, lack of mobile phones in Sudan so information doesn't get out, political reasons due to Israel, general racism, anti semitism, trending issues, what is seen more on social media, what the mainstream media focus on the most (Currently Ukraine and Gaza and not Sudan), etc. Thanks for the likes, agreement emojis. I realise not everyone feels they can comment (don't blame them) especially when it appears sometimes impossible to just discuss in a rational way why some conflicts receive more sympathy than others. Perhaps it touches at the inequity, bias or racism or anti semitism, or something else. 🤔 which brings out the now deleted comments.