Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Israel supporting counter marches in London - about time

673 replies

mids2019 · 13/04/2024 21:05

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13304895/Met-Police-arrest-Palestine-Israel-march-London-protest-Gaza.html

I think in a democracy this is absolutely necessary. Obviously policing will be important but it is good to see that in terms of street protest this is not a come sided issue.

I wonder how many are going to be arrested losing their rag seeing Israeli flags an masse after getting themselves riled up calling for a ceasefire.....

Met arrest nine as Palestine and Israel protesters march in London

The Met Police has today arrested nine people as thousands of pro-Palestine activists and Israel supporting counter protesters marched through London amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13304895/Met-Police-arrest-Palestine-Israel-march-London-protest-Gaza.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
stormy4319trevor · 15/04/2024 16:42

If Israel thinks Iran is instrumental in the events of Oct 7th and in the arming of its enemies, it would not have mattered if Iran had sent a couple of damp squibs., or not responded at all. Israel would attack them again anyway, surely, or their consulates, perhaps. All the noise about what would happen if Iran responded or not seems beside the point. If Iran responded or not they would be attacked again, since Israel thinks they are involved in the Gaza campaign anyway?

ohthejoys21 · 15/04/2024 16:43

Pumpkinatmidnight · 14/04/2024 15:47

I have been marching in the Jewish bloc from the very first peace/ ceasefire protest and have never felt unsafe or experienced anti-Semitism until the last march on 30th March: helping out at family section after the marich ended, where kids were colouring in, making clay candle holders and blowing balloons, a middle aged woman walked over and started shaking her head at the family groups and snapping photos and videos. I went up to her, introduced myself and asked her to seek consent before taking photos of The children. she started saying that she is a mother and grandmother and has friends in Israel and she feels unsafe in her city... I was patient though when she dramatically opened her shirt to reveal a red t-shirt with 'being them home now's and started barking to others walking over to see what's what: ' I'm a Zionist and you all are terrorist supporters' that rattled some, particularly two medics with MSf who had been to Gaza and the West bank and witnessed atrocities for many years. I took her to the side and calmly explained that my father is also a self-concefessed Zionist and why I am adamantly against their colonial ideologies, and that there are many Jews marching today etc she began to hiss at me, called me 'a self-hating jew' and how my family 'must be ashamed of you're and 'I know I would not talk to my children if they turned into terrorists' then walked off as I stood there, shocked and sincerely deeply wounded. This has made me accutely aware of my safety, who I choose to confront and I have since made sure I am always with fellow protesters and never confront anyone on my own. My experience beyond this one of the 'counter protests' is that the group's are significantly smaller but they are there to provoke, to incite anger and an aggressive response. I am also ashamed to be connected with any 'pro-israeli' groups and hate the consistent conflation of Judaism with Zionism and Israel.

Edited

I am confused as to why you felt 'unsafe' in the presence of this woman? Perhaps you didn't like what she had to say/didnt agree, but I can't see why you would feel threatened?

EasterIssland · 15/04/2024 16:43

statsfun · 15/04/2024 16:41

I think you're exaggerating the condemnation. That's why I'm asking you to give examples.

From the front pages of the bbc:

Sunak tells the Commons that Iran showed its "true colours" OK. But it's hardly a rant.

And it's followed by 2 points he made on de-escalation, and then a comment from Sunak that the conflict in Gaza "must end", highlighting the "appalling toll on civilians" and the need to see new aid crossings into Gaza and he paid tribute to three British aid workers killed in an Israeli strike in Gaza and called for a humanitarian pause in Gaza. So Sunak said more against Israel than Iran.

Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey condemns Iran's attack as an "alarming escalation" in a conflict that has "already seen far too many deaths and suffering". 'Alarming escalation' isn't really a condemnation, is it? Like before, he criticises Israel in the same breath.

Mhairi Black from the SNP doesn't even bother mentioning Iran before mentioning the "violent acts of Israel" in Gaza, and says "there must be a political and diplomatic solution" to conflict in the Middle East.

Your turn.

Not the poster you were asking. But this is Sunaks reaction

Israel supporting counter marches in London - about time
statsfun · 15/04/2024 16:46

moderationincludingmoderation · 15/04/2024 16:29

The Wise hold strong views, weakly.

Grin

I retract my comment on lack of condemnation.

stormy4319trevor · 15/04/2024 16:48

@ohthejoys21 Do yo feel quite relaxed in the face of verbal abuse? I wouldn't myself, as it can sometimes lead to a physical outburst from an aggressive person. I would move swiftly away from a person who was calling me names and being abusive.

BabaBarrio · 15/04/2024 16:49

statsfun · 15/04/2024 16:41

I think you're exaggerating the condemnation. That's why I'm asking you to give examples.

From the front pages of the bbc:

Sunak tells the Commons that Iran showed its "true colours" OK. But it's hardly a rant.

And it's followed by 2 points he made on de-escalation, and then a comment from Sunak that the conflict in Gaza "must end", highlighting the "appalling toll on civilians" and the need to see new aid crossings into Gaza and he paid tribute to three British aid workers killed in an Israeli strike in Gaza and called for a humanitarian pause in Gaza. So Sunak said more against Israel than Iran.

Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey condemns Iran's attack as an "alarming escalation" in a conflict that has "already seen far too many deaths and suffering". 'Alarming escalation' isn't really a condemnation, is it? Like before, he criticises Israel in the same breath.

Mhairi Black from the SNP doesn't even bother mentioning Iran before mentioning the "violent acts of Israel" in Gaza, and says "there must be a political and diplomatic solution" to conflict in the Middle East.

Your turn.

Hmm, you must have missed a lot about IRAN…try a find in page “Iran” search when reading the news so you don’t miss the condemnation.
BBC:https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-middle-east-68737710

Sunak also told the Commons
”If you've just joined us, here is a recap of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's statement to the Commons:

  • Sunak said Iran sought to "plunge the Middle East into crisis" with its attack on Israel which was "without precedent" and "a reckless and dangerous escalation"

Sunak published written formal U.K.gov Statement:
”I condemn in the strongest terms the Iranian regime’s reckless attack against Israel. These strikes risk inflaming tensions and destabilising the region. Iran has once again demonstrated that it is intent on sowing chaos in its own backyard.
The UK will continue to stand up for Israel’s security and that of all our regional partners, including Jordan and Iraq. Alongside our allies, we are urgently working to stabilise the situation and prevent further escalation. No one wants to see more bloodshed.”
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-statement-on-iranian-regimes-reckless-attack-against-israel

also

  • Starmer said Iran had "left the world a more dangerous place", and that its attack "must be wholly condemned"
  • He called on Israel to show "strength and courage to de-escalate" and warned diplomatic premises should not be attacked following the strike on Iran's consulate in Iran - widely considered to be by Israel
  • Starmer asked about sanctions on Iran, and called again for aid to Gaza to be "drastically scaled up", an immediate ceasefire and release of Israeli hostages
  • The SNP's Mhairi Black condemned Iran's actions as "a cynical attempt to exploit the suffering, pain and turmoil being experienced" by Palestinians

I’ve gone to a lot of trouble to find you these English versions by your own country’s press and government.

Auvergne63 · 15/04/2024 16:54

EasterIssland · 15/04/2024 16:37

Thanks @Auvergne63 do you know what Ursula said when Israel bombed the consulate ? Bet she was quiet. Same way she’s been quiet about Palestine for a long time

I don't know but so far none of "our leaders" have mentioned the bombing of the consulate. It is as if it never happened...

BabaBarrio · 15/04/2024 16:59

stormy4319trevor · 15/04/2024 16:42

If Israel thinks Iran is instrumental in the events of Oct 7th and in the arming of its enemies, it would not have mattered if Iran had sent a couple of damp squibs., or not responded at all. Israel would attack them again anyway, surely, or their consulates, perhaps. All the noise about what would happen if Iran responded or not seems beside the point. If Iran responded or not they would be attacked again, since Israel thinks they are involved in the Gaza campaign anyway?

This is true. And the consulate attack wasn’t the first Israeli attack on Iranian government personnel. In December 2023, they were bombing cars to assassinate IRG members.

It also wasn’t Israel’s first airstrike in Syria, they have been doing them almost weekly since October 7th.
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-shifts-deadlier-strikes-iran-linked-targets-syria-2024-01-08/

We all know Iran funds Hezbollah, and we all know they have been exchanging fire with each other over the border between Lebanon and Israel. But has anyone seen the data on how out of 4,733 attacks, 3,952 have been by Israel into Lebanon? With 357 out of 379 deaths being Lebanese?

Israel supporting counter marches in London - about time
noblegiraffe · 15/04/2024 17:13

Finally, I can't believe what I am about to write here but Iran has the moral high ground here.

Because it has got Hamas, Hezbollah and Houthis to do its dirty work, Iran’s hands are clean?

samG76 · 15/04/2024 17:26

The fact that they killed members of the revolutionary guards with hizbollah members and no-one else is a pretty good demonstration that it was being used as a military HQ. If they had killed 15 tourists filling in their visa applications or trying to pick up their passports, it would have suggested otherwise...

stormy4319trevor · 15/04/2024 17:26

Thanks @BabaBarrio I feel there's an inevitability about Israel and Iran going to war, supported by their allies. The talk of attacks and responses seems artificial to me somehow, as if the confrontation was always going to happen.

BelleHathor · 15/04/2024 17:28

stormy4319trevor · 15/04/2024 16:42

If Israel thinks Iran is instrumental in the events of Oct 7th and in the arming of its enemies, it would not have mattered if Iran had sent a couple of damp squibs., or not responded at all. Israel would attack them again anyway, surely, or their consulates, perhaps. All the noise about what would happen if Iran responded or not seems beside the point. If Iran responded or not they would be attacked again, since Israel thinks they are involved in the Gaza campaign anyway?

Israel has been attacking Iran for 14 years, killing scientists, sabotaging infrastructure. It's just been a shadow war with Iran never responding directly. The assassination on legally Iranian territory on April 1st and an accumulation of Israel bombing other sovereign countries in the region (with no condemnation) crossed so far over Iran's red lines that for the 1st time they responded directly in a limited capacity.

https://m.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-797031

More direct attacks? Iran may be done hiding behind proxies - analysis

The recent drone attack and lack of response from Israel indicate that Iran may feel comfortable conducting more direct strikes - and so far they have every reason to keep trying.

https://m.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-797031

BabaBarrio · 15/04/2024 17:30

samG76 · 15/04/2024 17:26

The fact that they killed members of the revolutionary guards with hizbollah members and no-one else is a pretty good demonstration that it was being used as a military HQ. If they had killed 15 tourists filling in their visa applications or trying to pick up their passports, it would have suggested otherwise...

Six Syrian civilians died? The strike was after 5pm, when it was closed for the day too.

stormy4319trevor · 15/04/2024 17:34

OK, I see. Very worrying indeed.

Limelemonx · 15/04/2024 17:37

noblegiraffe · 15/04/2024 17:13

Finally, I can't believe what I am about to write here but Iran has the moral high ground here.

Because it has got Hamas, Hezbollah and Houthis to do its dirty work, Iran’s hands are clean?

Yeah...what the heck....Iran most definitely don't have any moral high ground...they're responsible for most of this mess...

kelsaycobbles · 15/04/2024 17:38

Oh no sir he started it

KestrelMoon · 15/04/2024 17:44

Limelemonx · 15/04/2024 17:37

Yeah...what the heck....Iran most definitely don't have any moral high ground...they're responsible for most of this mess...

I think it’s the British and Americans via the UN most responsible for the mess. They had no right to carve up the Ottoman Empire, draw lines on maps and promise the same land to two peoples.

Limelemonx · 15/04/2024 17:50

KestrelMoon · 15/04/2024 17:44

I think it’s the British and Americans via the UN most responsible for the mess. They had no right to carve up the Ottoman Empire, draw lines on maps and promise the same land to two peoples.

It's really not that simple....but that happened and there have been many attempts at 2 state solutions proposed since which have been rejected. I can't actually see a 2 state solution working anytime in the near future.

ohthejoys21 · 15/04/2024 17:52

stormy4319trevor · 15/04/2024 16:48

@ohthejoys21 Do yo feel quite relaxed in the face of verbal abuse? I wouldn't myself, as it can sometimes lead to a physical outburst from an aggressive person. I would move swiftly away from a person who was calling me names and being abusive.

She might have been upset but I can't see one thing she said that was abusive.. perhaps that suits your narrative better.

Auvergne63 · 15/04/2024 17:53

Limelemonx · 15/04/2024 17:37

Yeah...what the heck....Iran most definitely don't have any moral high ground...they're responsible for most of this mess...

Once again, Israel is never at fault and never accountable. They are the victims, always.
To be fair, it has worked well for them, enabling the murder of thousands of Palestinians, by any means and in all impunity for 75 years.

KestrelMoon · 15/04/2024 17:54

Limelemonx · 15/04/2024 17:50

It's really not that simple....but that happened and there have been many attempts at 2 state solutions proposed since which have been rejected. I can't actually see a 2 state solution working anytime in the near future.

Edited

By both sides at various points in history, in my opinion because the two states were lines drawn on the map by the US via the UN. At times not acceptable to Israelis and at times not acceptable to Palestinians. Even when they both agreed, under US pressure (duress?) all it took was an assassination of the Israeli PM that signed the agreement to derail the two state solution from happening. I also don’t have much hope for peace, perhaps tomorrow I will have more hope.

Auvergne63 · 15/04/2024 17:54

ohthejoys21 · 15/04/2024 17:52

She might have been upset but I can't see one thing she said that was abusive.. perhaps that suits your narrative better.

The bloody irony!

noblegiraffe · 15/04/2024 17:56

Auvergne63 · 15/04/2024 17:53

Once again, Israel is never at fault and never accountable. They are the victims, always.
To be fair, it has worked well for them, enabling the murder of thousands of Palestinians, by any means and in all impunity for 75 years.

Do you understand that saying Iran doesn't have the moral high ground isn't giving it to Israel? That both countries can be doing bad things??

StormyAprilSkies · 15/04/2024 17:57

Auvergne63 · 15/04/2024 15:05

In short:
Israel can bomb anything and anyone, anytime and anywhere in the knowledge that big brother (USA) have got their back. They can disregard any international laws when it suits them and invokes them when needed.
They can starve to death innocent people, deprive them of the basics to survive and so on and the world governments side with them because it is self defence.

Iran decides to use the self defence card and warns the whole world of their intentions, even disclosing how they would do it and the world condemns them.
No one was killed and minimum damage was done. Iran planned it that way.

It is also a great distraction from the horrors, inflicted on the Palestinians, in Gaza.

Finally, I can't believe what I am about to write here but Iran has the moral high ground here.

By the way I have no love for the Iranian regime.

The only reason no one was killed was because Israel have invested heavily in defence. They have to since they would be annilated otherwise.

Iran fund terrorism but clearly terrorism has support from some.

KestrelMoon · 15/04/2024 18:07

StormyAprilSkies · 15/04/2024 17:57

The only reason no one was killed was because Israel have invested heavily in defence. They have to since they would be annilated otherwise.

Iran fund terrorism but clearly terrorism has support from some.

That was not the only reason. Several military analysts have said Iran is capable of much worse. Iran has also threatened much worse if Israel retaliates.

Iran launched slow attack drones that take hours to arrive on target. And announced the attack as they were launching them.

Then they waited a couple hours and launched around 100 ballistic missiles with small conventional war heads on them. Ballistic missiles take 12 mins to go from Iran to target in Israel. The USAF, RAF, IAF and JAF were scrambled and their jets knocking out the drones, so it was not too difficult to also knock out the ballistic missiles as the joint air forces were already there and active.

Iran could have sent several hundred lethal radioactive dirty bomb armed ballistic missiles with no warning at all. They could wipe Tel Aviv off the map. They showed restraint. This isn’t to be applauded, this is just fact that Israel is still under threat from Iran.

Swipe left for the next trending thread