I think you're exaggerating the condemnation. That's why I'm asking you to give examples.
From the front pages of the bbc:
Sunak tells the Commons that Iran showed its "true colours" OK. But it's hardly a rant.
And it's followed by 2 points he made on de-escalation, and then a comment from Sunak that the conflict in Gaza "must end", highlighting the "appalling toll on civilians" and the need to see new aid crossings into Gaza and he paid tribute to three British aid workers killed in an Israeli strike in Gaza and called for a humanitarian pause in Gaza. So Sunak said more against Israel than Iran.
Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey condemns Iran's attack as an "alarming escalation" in a conflict that has "already seen far too many deaths and suffering". 'Alarming escalation' isn't really a condemnation, is it? Like before, he criticises Israel in the same breath.
Mhairi Black from the SNP doesn't even bother mentioning Iran before mentioning the "violent acts of Israel" in Gaza, and says "there must be a political and diplomatic solution" to conflict in the Middle East.
Your turn.