@aswarmofmidges
Yes, that makes more sense.
I don't believe either side could or should completely wipe out everyone who might now or in the future hate them enough to cause future violence so these attacks just perpetuate violence
It's not a question of that. Israel just needs to wipe out those who refuse to accept its existence. There are states in the region like Jordan and Egypt who already do. Once that can be taken for granted amongst all its neighbours it will have no need for expensive and dangerous "buffer zones".
Hamas have the harder job as they need to destroy the Israeli state itself, which has the USA behind it among others.
Stop killing and start talking
start accepting each other as human not animal
LOL, you say that likes it's an obvious thing. But there's a problem with this on each side:
The whole genesis of Israel - the zionist drive to make that piece of land a jewish homeland, the partition plan based on it and the expulsion of thousands of Palestinians to make it possible - was predicated on a racist colonial mentality in which the Palestinians were less than human, so the British and UN could divide up political settlements around them as if they were dealing with ^terra nullius".
And the whole vision that Hamas and the like imagine in its place is one which jews are less than human, and subject to persecution and dhimmi status under the righteous and "natural" rule of Islam over the entire region.
Both mentalities are fundamentally theocratic, but with a different theo. Arguing about the limitations of that and its power to keep everyone stuck in the cycle of violence sounds perfectly convincing to me, but entails all the same problems that trying to reason with religion always entails.