Filled it in and said-
"Human beings, as infants, are designed to consume human milk. Giving them milk which is designed for infant cattle is, obvious to any fool, not the best thing for them. Why would anyone be against this most natural of acts?
Artificially fed babies are at an increased risk of-
Gastroenteritis-up to 5 1/2 times more likely
Middle ear infections-up to 3 times more likely
Respiratory infections-twice as likely
Urinary tract infections-5 times more likely
Necrotising entercolitis-20 times more likely
As well as juvenile onset diabetes (type 1), increased blood pressure, wheeze, obesity and the development of brain, nervous system and eyesight is affected especially in premature babies.
Why would anyone knowingly want to introduce their or anyone else's baby to these risks when there is a free, readily available, all natural alternative that we are biologically programmed to produce and consume?
The key word there is knowingly. Unfortunately not everyone knows the benefits of breastfeeding compared with the risks of artificial feeding. Your programme, GMTV, would be a perfect platform to help to educate those who are unaware of the dangers they may be putting their children in by not breastfeeding them. What a crying shame for all of us that you choose not to promote it but instead to add to the stigma attached with questions such as:
"Do you think a woman's breasts should not be displayed in public for any reason?"
In this context we are talking about feeding a hungry baby here, not flashing at strangers in the street. Breastfeeding is not a lewd act that we should be ashamed of. It is simply the best way to feed a baby.
The whole tone of your survey is negative towards breastfeeding and the questions have been phrased to influence the outcome.
Shame on you GMTV."