Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not want to be responsible for SC as adults?

253 replies

EwaZB · Yesterday 13:28

Boyfriend and I have been together for four years. I have DD18 and DS24. He has DSDs16 (twins) and DSS17. The plan has always been to move in together when DSDs are 18, and he’s started sending links to houses.

The thing is… Increasingly it looks like none of his children will fly the nest in a traditional sense any time soon. My son is living independently and my daughter moves out for university next summer.

I would love to live with my boyfriend, but not in a houseshare with three of his adult children. AIBU to scrap the plan?

OP posts:
Ihatelittlefriendsusan · Yesterday 13:45

EwaZB · Yesterday 13:36

I think it’s fairly unlikely, but both of my children would have a home with me if they ever wanted to return. I am in a fortunate position and can financially support them through uni and beyond.

It’s become clear that boyfriend’s children are unlikely to go into higher education or higher paid careers. I honestly don’t think they could afford to move out, nor could their parents help to pay for it.

So it is oknfor your kids but not for his.

FML for their sake you absolutely should not move on together.

Thundertoast · Yesterday 13:45

EwaZB · Yesterday 13:36

I think it’s fairly unlikely, but both of my children would have a home with me if they ever wanted to return. I am in a fortunate position and can financially support them through uni and beyond.

It’s become clear that boyfriend’s children are unlikely to go into higher education or higher paid careers. I honestly don’t think they could afford to move out, nor could their parents help to pay for it.

Could you maybe expand on the reasons why he thinks they'll be gone soon (by the fact he's sending you links) but you dont think they will?

Userregs · Yesterday 13:46

This reply has been withdrawn

Post withdrawn.

MojoMoon · Yesterday 13:46

Do not sell your homes and jointly buy one together. It's so high risk.

You don't need to live together to be in a relationship.

Genevieva · Yesterday 13:46

Revisit when the twins have finished school, then remind him the plan is for when they leave home.

Userregs · Yesterday 13:47

This reply has been withdrawn

Post withdrawn.

nomas · Yesterday 13:47

EwaZB · Yesterday 13:45

This is what I’m thinking. His children are perfectly nice but I don’t want to live with them or subsidise them (and wouldn’t expect him to live with or subsidise mine, either). Of course we’d have spare rooms for short-term/holidays/emergencies but I don’t want to live in a houseshare. I did that when I was a lot younger!

I would tell him that you think you would be happiest if all the kids have launched as adults and had their own homes before the two of you moved in together.

That way he can't say you are targeting his kids.

Can he afford to buy his kids a flat when they turn 18 or 20 etc?

Mungo67 · Yesterday 13:47

Don’t just don’t. Speaking from experience your relationship will never be the same

ilovepixie · Yesterday 13:47

EwaZB · Yesterday 13:36

I think it’s fairly unlikely, but both of my children would have a home with me if they ever wanted to return. I am in a fortunate position and can financially support them through uni and beyond.

It’s become clear that boyfriend’s children are unlikely to go into higher education or higher paid careers. I honestly don’t think they could afford to move out, nor could their parents help to pay for it.

So your children will always be welcome in your joint home , but your partners children won’t be you sound delightful and a bit of a snob. If I was your partner I’d run now.

SeniorSausage · Yesterday 13:48

Sounds like he wants rid of his kids and moving in with you will allow him to do that. You'll be the evil stepmother preventing these kids from having the support of their dad while they transition to adulthood. Plus it sounds like you are better off than him which will create further problems when his kids need bankrolling for something.

nomas · Yesterday 13:48

Thundertoast · Yesterday 13:45

Could you maybe expand on the reasons why he thinks they'll be gone soon (by the fact he's sending you links) but you dont think they will?

I wonder if he thinks moving him and his kids in with a woman will mean his messy house will no longer be messy.

DrinkFeckArseBrick · Yesterday 13:49

What does he think his children are going to do at 18? Do they live with him now or just visit?

nomas · Yesterday 13:50

ilovepixie · Yesterday 13:47

So your children will always be welcome in your joint home , but your partners children won’t be you sound delightful and a bit of a snob. If I was your partner I’d run now.

I think you're missing OP's point.

Her home is there for emergencies. She doesn't expect her kids to live with her.

But it sounds like his kids will be living with their dad for a long time.

It is in everybody's interests for everyone to live in their own homes.

InterIgnis · Yesterday 13:51

Yanbu. You already know that you’ll be the one expected to contribute the most financially.

While there’s always a ‘risk’ of young adult children not being able to move out, the chances of that being the case for his children are significantly higher. That is not what you want to sign up for.

MyArtfulGreySloth · Yesterday 13:52

You clearly resent the idea of supporting his children but not your own, so you obviously shouldn’t live together. There’s nothing wrong with that, they are his kids not yours, just be upfront that the idea won’t work.

Ponderingwindow · Yesterday 13:52

You shouldn’t be getting rid of your children’s bedrooms until they have settled down. Living in student housing or moving from house share to house share does not count. They don’t have to have purchased property, but they need to be in a place that really counts as home.

Only having a couple of spare bedrooms when there are four children means you aren’t actually prepared to welcome your children home if needed.

AluckyEllie · Yesterday 13:53

100% not unreasonable. If his kids don’t leave it’s likely they would have a room each which would leave none for a spare room for your kids if they need it. It would be like you moved into his family rather than the two of you living together with kids from both sides popping back now and then.

I’d say downsize yourself to free up a bit of cash and leave him to stay in his house with the kids, or he could move in the small house with you and leave his kids in his one. He’d have to pay you rent though so financially might not work.

EwaZB · Yesterday 13:53

nomas · Yesterday 13:47

I would tell him that you think you would be happiest if all the kids have launched as adults and had their own homes before the two of you moved in together.

That way he can't say you are targeting his kids.

Can he afford to buy his kids a flat when they turn 18 or 20 etc?

If we bought together we’d both release some equity, but we’ve always discussed using that to travel and fund our retirements. If he spent it on property for his kids, his would be gone, and I’d be funding the retirement fun myself. So I’d be indirectly subsidising his adult kids and/or his retirement anyway.

I have separate savings to provide my own kids with a deposit when they’re ready.

OP posts:
JustGotToKeepOnKeepingOn · Yesterday 13:53

Definitely scrap the plan of moving in together. This isn’t going to work. To be honest, you’ve got a great situation. You have your own home, you’re financially secure and have DCs who are going places. Don’t give this up!

Why do you want to live with this man? What is he bringing to the table? If I was you, I’d carry on as you are, together but not living together and review in 10 years time. Seriously!

Twopairsoftightsandabigdairymilk · Yesterday 13:55

EwaZB · Yesterday 13:36

I think it’s fairly unlikely, but both of my children would have a home with me if they ever wanted to return. I am in a fortunate position and can financially support them through uni and beyond.

It’s become clear that boyfriend’s children are unlikely to go into higher education or higher paid careers. I honestly don’t think they could afford to move out, nor could their parents help to pay for it.

Where will your daughter go in the holidays then? Some unis have 8 wk terms. My mind is boggling.

MostlyHappyMummy · Yesterday 13:56

Why would you even consider this?

Why does he think his children will be less noisy and messy if he moves in with you? Will he learn parenting skills?

nomas · Yesterday 13:57

EwaZB · Yesterday 13:53

If we bought together we’d both release some equity, but we’ve always discussed using that to travel and fund our retirements. If he spent it on property for his kids, his would be gone, and I’d be funding the retirement fun myself. So I’d be indirectly subsidising his adult kids and/or his retirement anyway.

I have separate savings to provide my own kids with a deposit when they’re ready.

You are right to see the pitfalls now.

Does he not expect his kids to get house shares or rent a flat when they have finished their education and started working full time?

It's possible that he is perfectly happy with his kids living with him throughout their 20s, in which case that's his choice but it shouldn't mean you have to join him in this life.

I have separate savings to provide my own kids with a deposit when they’re ready.

Does DP know about these savings?

Userregs · Yesterday 13:58

This reply has been withdrawn

Post withdrawn.

EwaZB · Yesterday 13:59

MyArtfulGreySloth · Yesterday 13:52

You clearly resent the idea of supporting his children but not your own, so you obviously shouldn’t live together. There’s nothing wrong with that, they are his kids not yours, just be upfront that the idea won’t work.

Yes, I think this covers it. If his children’s needs were the same as my children’s needs, it’d be fine (and that’s what we were both expecting initially). But they’re not.

OP posts:
LibertyBustop · Yesterday 13:59

ilovepixie · Yesterday 13:47

So your children will always be welcome in your joint home , but your partners children won’t be you sound delightful and a bit of a snob. If I was your partner I’d run now.

That’s really not what she is saying.

Looking around at my friends in their fifties their lives and future plans are significantly impacted by how long it takes their children to transition into financial independence.

A financial mismatch between the OP and her partner could be the cause of quite a lot of friction and that’s not even considering how the kids will feel about having to move home and move in with a new woman. She’s sensible to be cautious for everyone’s sake.