Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to not force DD5 to use other child's preferred pronouns?

459 replies

Craziesareoutinfullforce · 02/10/2026 18:05

So today I picked up DD5 from school and her teacher told me that my DD had asked a little boy in the playground why he was wearing a dress. He said it's because he is a girl, and my DD, confused, disputed this and said "but you are a boy", which has of course upset him and now my DD is in trouble. Apparently he went to the teacher and she pulled my DD aside and said what she said was unkind and she needs to respect how other people describe themselves.

My DD has ASD and has only recently become verbal, school are well aware of this and she has an EHCP outlining her communication difficulties, with her mental age being approx 3 years old (in terms of where she is with development). My argument was that she has additional needs and has zero concept of transgenderism so she was not to know, and was also in no way unkind as she was asking a genuine question and not trying to be nasty. I imagine any 5 year old would be confused by this? I think if you asked a NT 5yo to use preferred pronouns they likely would, but still don't feel anybody should be forced into doing this or face punishment.

I did also say to the teacher that this is not something that is encouraged at home and we have never spoken about it. She told me that they are an inclusive school and everybody is to be accepted, and that from now on DD must use his preferred pronouns and call this boy 'she/her', she had said this to my DD at the time and she got upset because "that's not right" (my DDs words). I told her that I will not be enforcing this and will contact the LA regarding the matter should they pursue it in future, given that they are point blank disregarding DD's ND and EHCP, essentially.

Aibu here? I expect to get hate for this, and I'm really not trying to encourage any phobia regarding trans people, it is just not something I accept or feel comfortable with or encourage. I would never attack someone for being this way etc., but just feel nobody should be forced into calling a boy a girl and vice versa when they are clearly not. It feels really unfair and frankly bizarre that my 5 year old with ND is being penalised for calling a boy a boy. I don't think I need to take this any further but unsure what to do if anything happens regarding this in future? I did mention above I would contact LA but would they take the same stance as the school? I have emailed the headteacher about it but he has not yet replied. Please help, feeling stuck and idk if I'm in the wrong or not.

OP posts:
ThreadGuardDog · 02/10/2026 21:16

TheKeatingFive · 02/10/2026 20:59

The protected characteristic with regards to trans issues is undergoing medical transition.

Which would not apply to this child (thank goodness).

Unfortunately it applies just as much to a five year old child as it does anyone else. Under Section 7 of the Equality Act, a person is protected if they are proposing to undergo, undergoing, or have undergone a process to reassign their sex. The law confirms this process is personal and social rather than medical.

For a young child, this can be as simple as choosing a different name, using different pronouns, or dressing as their preferred gender. It’s illegal for schools, nurseries, or service providers to discriminate against, harass, or victimise a child because of these choices.

The department of education recognises that children cannot legally change their sex but schools still have to ensure that legal protections are enforced where the child has expressed a gender preference.

BeLoyalCoralHiker · 02/10/2026 21:16

dizzydizzydizzy · 02/10/2026 21:04

I think you are partly reasonable and partly unreasonable. I think you are reasonable to assume your DD meant no harm. I think you are unreasonable to assume any 5yo would be confused by this - people’s life experiences vary enormously so some will have trans relatives.

I think you are reasonable to expect the school to consider your DD’s significant communication difficulties and realise she meant no harm. Has the school tried to explain it to her?

You are very unreasonable to tell the school that you are not enforcing your DD to call the other child their preferred pronouns. It is not for you to decide. You can explain it to your DD along the lines of “it doesn’t matter if you don’t understand it, just try to use their preferred name because that is the kind thing to do.”

Edited

I agree, as the parent of ND children who would also have struggled being both literal and blunt I would have been annoyed with the school making out they were being deliberately unkind. But at the same time it’s not difficult to say “in these circumstances this is what you say” and if anything they will find it easier to stick to; my older son is autistic and once he was told “whatever someone says their name is that’s what you call them” he was fine with it because there was a rule.

Craziesareoutinfullforce · 02/10/2026 21:16

Dullhead · 02/10/2026 21:11

I am not teaching my daughter that it is okay to be forced into doing what someone else wants them to or they get punished

by sending her to a school that does, you kind of are

That's why I'm fighting it. Send her to a different school and it could just happen again. I do not have the time or resources to home educate, and even so would not want to, personally.

OP posts:
ThreadGuardDog · 02/10/2026 21:18

Craziesareoutinfullforce · 02/10/2026 21:16

That's why I'm fighting it. Send her to a different school and it could just happen again. I do not have the time or resources to home educate, and even so would not want to, personally.

OP all schools have to abide by the Equality Act 2010 so it’s going to be very difficult to find a school that doesn’t comply. I’m in no way saying I agree with it and I reiterate, your own child has their own protected characteristics which must be observed.

Dullhead · 02/10/2026 21:18

Craziesareoutinfullforce · 02/10/2026 21:16

That's why I'm fighting it. Send her to a different school and it could just happen again. I do not have the time or resources to home educate, and even so would not want to, personally.

But at least choose a school that doesn’t segregate the ND and the NT at play times

Dullhead · 02/10/2026 21:19

ThreadGuardDog · 02/10/2026 21:18

OP all schools have to abide by the Equality Act 2010 so it’s going to be very difficult to find a school that doesn’t comply. I’m in no way saying I agree with it and I reiterate, your own child has their own protected characteristics which must be observed.

This child did not have a protected characteristic at the stage of wanting to wear a dress for a day

the protected characteristic bit doesn’t come until transitioning

CharlieEffie · 02/10/2026 21:20

No, sorry your daughters development has NOTHING to do. She was stating a simple fact, as 99% of 5 year olds do. He is a boy. At 5 years old shes not to understand the difference between what a child is and what they "see themselves as" i would be straight on the phone to school to complain that a teacher told your dd she was being unkind

Craziesareoutinfullforce · 02/10/2026 21:20

BeLoyalCoralHiker · 02/10/2026 21:16

I agree, as the parent of ND children who would also have struggled being both literal and blunt I would have been annoyed with the school making out they were being deliberately unkind. But at the same time it’s not difficult to say “in these circumstances this is what you say” and if anything they will find it easier to stick to; my older son is autistic and once he was told “whatever someone says their name is that’s what you call them” he was fine with it because there was a rule.

I hipe she grows up to understand this. But her ASD makes her so rigid in her understanding of things that she gets genuinely annoyed when it is questioned. Like recently, we were learning letters together and (as per professional advice) I was intentionally mislabelling some of the letters to try and catch her out and make her correct me. Not only did she correct me, but she got very upset and annoyed that I said, twice, that the letter "D" was "A". If someone questions something that she knows to be true, she just has a meltdown. Navigating this is going to be an absolute nightmare, and already is.

OP posts:
Craziesareoutinfullforce · 02/10/2026 21:21

CharlieEffie · 02/10/2026 21:20

No, sorry your daughters development has NOTHING to do. She was stating a simple fact, as 99% of 5 year olds do. He is a boy. At 5 years old shes not to understand the difference between what a child is and what they "see themselves as" i would be straight on the phone to school to complain that a teacher told your dd she was being unkind

Thank you. Have already emailed the headteacher a very lengthy email about it and am awaiting his response. I really hope he can sort it without me having to take it further as I have enough on my plate as it is, but me being me will not let this rest.

OP posts:
Craziesareoutinfullforce · 02/10/2026 21:23

Dullhead · 02/10/2026 21:18

But at least choose a school that doesn’t segregate the ND and the NT at play times

It is for a reason. She finds busy social situations overwhelming, hence why they werre doing a trial run today. Which went brilliantly, until this!

OP posts:
NotAtMyAge · 02/10/2026 21:24

ThreadGuardDog · 02/10/2026 21:16

Unfortunately it applies just as much to a five year old child as it does anyone else. Under Section 7 of the Equality Act, a person is protected if they are proposing to undergo, undergoing, or have undergone a process to reassign their sex. The law confirms this process is personal and social rather than medical.

For a young child, this can be as simple as choosing a different name, using different pronouns, or dressing as their preferred gender. It’s illegal for schools, nurseries, or service providers to discriminate against, harass, or victimise a child because of these choices.

The department of education recognises that children cannot legally change their sex but schools still have to ensure that legal protections are enforced where the child has expressed a gender preference.

Edited

The new DfE safeguarding guide linked to earlier in the thread makes it clear that gender-confused children can no longer use the toilets or other single-sex spaces of the opposite sex. This little boy will always stand out because regardless of what he wears he can't use the girls' facilities.

Craziesareoutinfullforce · 02/10/2026 21:24

ThreadGuardDog · 02/10/2026 21:18

OP all schools have to abide by the Equality Act 2010 so it’s going to be very difficult to find a school that doesn’t comply. I’m in no way saying I agree with it and I reiterate, your own child has their own protected characteristics which must be observed.

I know, I understand and respect that I really do. I want both my DD and this little boy to feel safe and protected at school, as all kids should. It is just highly frustrating and upsetting that it feels my DDs needs are being disregarded in favour of the other child. I really, really hope the head can sort it and that's that. I can just feel it's going to be a lengthy battle, but hope I am wrong. Thank you though

OP posts:
AnswerIsNo · 02/10/2026 21:25

.

Craziesareoutinfullforce · 02/10/2026 21:29

Everydayimhuffling · 02/10/2026 20:57

So she thought this child wearing a dress was a boy based on their hair? I don't understand why you think it would be confusing for her to say to her, "girls can have short hair. If someone tells you they are a boy then you call them he, and if they tell you they are a girl you call them she". That's pretty simple as far as social rules go. All of that is accurate to how we behave in society and none of it is expecting too much of your child.

She thought he was a boy because he is a boy with short hair and a wider jaw and is clearly a boy. Just like how everyone else on ghe planet determines someone else's gender. Hence why she found it confusing he was wearing a dress, and asked him innocently why he was wearing a dress. Because she knows dresses are for girls and not boys. If he was wearing boy clothes with long hair I don't think she would have said anything. I dont know of any other boys that wear dresses at the school so he does stand out. Again, a 5yo with the MA of a 3yo just cannot be transphobic, as they do not know what transgenderism is.

I have taken from this thread that there are A LOT of parents of NT children who really, really fail to grasp what differences ND kids have and how it presents in everyday life. Perhaps educate yourselves on the matter instead of telling other people to push transgender ideology onto their infant kids?

OP posts:
NotAtMyAge · 02/10/2026 21:30

Craziesareoutinfullforce · 02/10/2026 19:48

I did include this in the email to the headteacher, given that I wasnt aware there was a trans student at the school I wanted to make sure she, and no other female pupils will be sharing a toilet with him. They have single sex toilets and if they do allow him to use the girls, I will be very clear in my reasons that she only uses the disabled toilet until it is addressed.

I think if he responds saying that he is able to use the girls toilets I will discuss with other parents to make sure this does not continue. Not much of an issue at this age but by year 6 this cannot be allowed.

I think if he responds saying that he is able to use the girls toilets I will discuss with other parents to make sure this does not continue. Not much of an issue at this age but by year 6 this cannot be allowed.

OP, the new DfE document linked to earlier makes it clear that following the Supreme Court judgment and the new EHRC guidance now in force, the school cannot allow this boy,or any other gender-questioning child, to use the facilities of the opposite sex.

Craziesareoutinfullforce · 02/10/2026 21:31

NotAtMyAge · 02/10/2026 21:30

I think if he responds saying that he is able to use the girls toilets I will discuss with other parents to make sure this does not continue. Not much of an issue at this age but by year 6 this cannot be allowed.

OP, the new DfE document linked to earlier makes it clear that following the Supreme Court judgment and the new EHRC guidance now in force, the school cannot allow this boy,or any other gender-questioning child, to use the facilities of the opposite sex.

Brilliant, thank you for sharing that. Have SSd and will note it down now should the Head's response be less than satisfactory. Thank you

OP posts:
AnswerIsNo · 02/10/2026 21:32

LavenderDisco · 02/10/2026 21:14

Ok. But what did you mean about adding on the /s?

I think chaos therory is a more valid argument than quarks turning our minds to mush, but sure 😂

/s is a tone indicator for sarcasm

Tone indicator - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_indicator

TheKeatingFive · 02/10/2026 21:33

ThreadGuardDog · 02/10/2026 21:18

OP all schools have to abide by the Equality Act 2010 so it’s going to be very difficult to find a school that doesn’t comply. I’m in no way saying I agree with it and I reiterate, your own child has their own protected characteristics which must be observed.

The child in question does not have a protected characteristic

Dullhead · 02/10/2026 21:33

Craziesareoutinfullforce · 02/10/2026 21:23

It is for a reason. She finds busy social situations overwhelming, hence why they werre doing a trial run today. Which went brilliantly, until this!

Is mainstream right for her if she’s basically being segregated the entire time anyway?

Dullhead · 02/10/2026 21:33

TheKeatingFive · 02/10/2026 21:33

The child in question does not have a protected characteristic

Exactly!!!

TheKeatingFive · 02/10/2026 21:35

Just saw your previous reply @ThreadGuardDog

There is no compulsion for adults to use preferred pronouns, let alone children

TheBlueKoala · 02/10/2026 21:37

Stompythedinosaur · 02/10/2026 19:54

I'm a parent of an autistic child too. It seems like a fairly simple job to explain the situation in terms they can understand and connect to, to me.

My dc were definitely able to understand that the person you are on the inside is more important than how you look by that age.

They also knew not to announce the hated a gift at their birthday party, or make negative (even if truthful) comments about other people's appearances or their work at school.

I'm not sure why it's suddenly a complete impossibility to discuss this social rule?

Because it's teaching them to lie. If the teacher's wearing a blue skirt but tells OP's child it's red, should we then tell the child that she has to go along with it even though that she can see for herself it isn't true?

@Craziesareoutinfullforce You can tell your dd that the boy likes to pretend that he's a girl (or his parents at this age I would say). But he is a boy.

NotAtMyAge · 02/10/2026 21:38

TheKeatingFive · 02/10/2026 21:33

The child in question does not have a protected characteristic

Unfortunately there is no lower age limit for the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, only for getting a GRC, when the limit is 18.

ThreadGuardDog · 02/10/2026 21:41

Dullhead · 02/10/2026 21:19

This child did not have a protected characteristic at the stage of wanting to wear a dress for a day

the protected characteristic bit doesn’t come until transitioning

No it doesn’t - quotes from the EA2010 upthread. Transitioning doesn’t have to be medical, but social and there is no age limit. Please don’t shoot the messenger.

TheKeatingFive · 02/10/2026 21:41

NotAtMyAge · 02/10/2026 21:38

Unfortunately there is no lower age limit for the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, only for getting a GRC, when the limit is 18.

I do not personally believe that this child would qualify as undergoing reassignment. However it is immaterial as there is no requirement for anyone to use preferred pronouns anyway.

Swipe left for the next trending thread