Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to resent my husband's generosity to his daughter but not mine?

903 replies

Alnoo · 05/08/2026 14:39

Hi all, I hope everyone is well.

For context, my husband and I met when the youngest of our respective children had just turned 18, 6 years ago, and we married 2 years ago.
Upon marriage we opted to retain our own properties, while I moved in with him and the rent I made from my property went towards bills and household costs.
Other wise our individual finances remain separate, we both still work and earn our own money.

He has one daughter who is 25, turning 26, I have 2 children 24 and 27 respectively.

He earns far more than I do, as a result he spoils his daughter who lives abroad, some recent examples include
£2,000 towards she and her boyfriends summer holiday
£11,000 on a vintage watch
£3,000 when her hand bag and phone were lost on a night out

She earns well, and has a property out right from her mothers side so none of these were needs and she never asks, he simply enjoys doing it and wants to.

Meanwhile I cannot afford this for my children, my children have expressed some concern that the rental income I get covers all the bills, they think this is unfair and it should be split. My husbands argument is that since we live in his house we can’t rent it out so I gain by living here.

Equally both of our daughters are getting married in 2027/8. So far he has already agreed to paying for his daughter’s entire wedding include a custom made dress likely in the 15-20k range. I can’t afford to contribute this to my daughter’s wedding and she has no father on the scene to help so they are having to self fund. I asked him if he would at least help me buy her dress (less expensive as she’s not interested in it being custom made) and he has said he doesn’t feel that’s his responsibility.

AIBU to be finding him quite selfish and unhelpful? His daughter is truly lovely and he is very loving but the financial disparity is more obvious than I excepted it to be.

OP posts:
FOJN · 07/08/2026 21:40

I'm a bit confused OP. You say you earn a good income, you pay a decent chunk of the bills but the amount is still less than your rental income, you are not paying for the housing itself, you split food but he pays for most of your meals out and holidays and your commuting costs are lower so what are you doing with your money when your living costs are so low?

Why can't you save to help your daughter pay for her wedding. A decent full time salary plus a portion of rental income should make saving 20k very doable. You can't expect him to pay for your daughter whilst you spend as like and don't save.

You should be financial comfortable but you make it sound like you are struggling which seems to be a you problem.

MayaPyjama · 07/08/2026 21:53

Aluna · 07/08/2026 18:38

Why should housing automatically go into a bucket of combined finances?
And if it does bills on one property should be combined cost to be spilt surely.

I think it depends on the circs. If they earned roughly the same or she out-earned him, it would make sense for the rental income to be shared.

But as he apparently significantly out-earns her - if her income + rental income is equal to or lower than his income she might as well keep both.

As things stand she’s paying bills on his house and the upkeep of her own, while he pays neither. She’s subsiding his primary property at the expense of hers.
Moreover, as her property is now a second home, she would be liable for CGT if she sold, whereas he would not.

The fact that she’s somewhat better off than living in her own place doesn’t mean that this set up is as equitable as it should be.

He’s paying for the upkeep on his house.

And housing should be combined finances because they live together. As OP says, she can only rent her house out if she lives in his house. He doesn’t get to make any return on the money he has invested in his house, it’s not really fair that she does because he’s housing her.

Aluna · 07/08/2026 22:03

InterIgnis · 07/08/2026 21:09

Yes. She said she paid all the bills, then later on said he didn’t. That would meet the definition of a lie, I believe?

“Central London is where annual service charges really skyrocket. The norm is often over £5,000 and in some cases can reach above £100,000.

In nine of London's most expensive postcodes average service charges are above £10,000 per annum.

For example, in W1J in Mayfair, the average is £16,594. In WC2R, around the Strand it's £15,191 and in SW1X, spanning parts of Belgravia and Knightbridge, it's £12,360 a year.”

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mortgageshome/article-15849283/Where-home-buyers-face-highest-service-charges-revealed-W1J-postcode-coming-top.html

Oh, and he also pays for the home insurance.

“He pays more when we go out for meals 1/2 times a week, usually covering all of it”

That hardly sounds like an even split.

According to OP, what she brings in just from the rental income is far more than what she spends on bills. She is far from hard done by and unable to save.

I think it could meet any number of definitions.

Not sure why you’re googling at me. I’m a Londoner and I know exactly what London service charges are. It entirely depends what type of flat and what the amenities are.

Aluna · 07/08/2026 22:09

MayaPyjama · 07/08/2026 21:53

He’s paying for the upkeep on his house.

And housing should be combined finances because they live together. As OP says, she can only rent her house out if she lives in his house. He doesn’t get to make any return on the money he has invested in his house, it’s not really fair that she does because he’s housing her.

Edited

There’s no should about it, it depends on things like income, investments, savings, pension etc.

Of course he makes a return on the money invested in his flat - capital growth.

Timeforachange26 · 07/08/2026 22:11

Aluna · 07/08/2026 22:09

There’s no should about it, it depends on things like income, investments, savings, pension etc.

Of course he makes a return on the money invested in his flat - capital growth.

She's still getting capital growth on her property also though

Aluna · 07/08/2026 22:34

Timeforachange26 · 07/08/2026 22:11

She's still getting capital growth on her property also though

I didn’t say she wasn’t. But she will owe CGT if she wanted to sell whereas he will not.

Phineyj · 07/08/2026 22:39

£11,000 on a watch!!!

Sam9769 · 07/08/2026 22:56

Phineyj · 07/08/2026 22:39

£11,000 on a watch!!!

He's wealthy. That's was probably a major factor in OP's decision to marry him!

InterIgnis · 07/08/2026 23:31

Aluna · 07/08/2026 22:03

I think it could meet any number of definitions.

Not sure why you’re googling at me. I’m a Londoner and I know exactly what London service charges are. It entirely depends what type of flat and what the amenities are.

Yes, lie has a number of synonyms.

He’s a wealthy man living in central London. He’s almost certainly not paying the lowest price when it comes to the service charge.

OP has a very good deal here, and she knows it.

Sailingbee · Yesterday 00:18

InterIgnis · 07/08/2026 21:16

It’s always been quite normal for those with wealth to protect their assets upon marriage. The practice of what is now called prenuptial agreement is at least 2000 years old, so far from a modern concept.

I wouldn’t have married a man with less than me, because I wouldn’t want to be in the position the husband is in.

I wouldn’t advise any of my children to hitch up to anyone with wealth, spoils everything, of course they don’t won’t to build a life together with you, relationship dominated by mistrust etc, changes everything

croydon15 · Yesterday 01:06

chocoluv · 05/08/2026 20:51

OP you’ve not said where the rest of your money goes after bills.

You have an entire monthly salary that’s unaccounted for.

This - l don't understand OP, you must have a substantial amount of money left every month, why have you not been saving for your DD's wedding instead of asking your DH to help.

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · Yesterday 03:57

Sounds as though he is loaded to me.
What's his problem?

Aluna · Yesterday 07:55

InterIgnis · 07/08/2026 23:31

Yes, lie has a number of synonyms.

He’s a wealthy man living in central London. He’s almost certainly not paying the lowest price when it comes to the service charge.

OP has a very good deal here, and she knows it.

So do bitter and envious but as you know that was not the point,

Lie is by far the least likely interpretation.

As I explained the cost of the service charge is entirely dependent on the type of fiat. A large conversion flat in a house with no lift and no grounds in an expensive area of London would be minimal compared to a mansion flat in a purpose built block with lifts and large grounds, even in a much less expensive area. The former has much less in the way of services to charge.

OP has said since the start she has a good deal, so that’s hardly revolutionary

animalprintfree · Yesterday 08:49

He has absolutely no obligation to pay anything towards your children. However, you don't sound like you're in loving partnership. I can't imagine not wanting to contribute to things my partner can't afford (like a wedding dres or present), if I was able, and it made them happy.

Why did you get married OP? Your lives sound quite separate.

Timeforachange26 · Yesterday 09:45

animalprintfree · Yesterday 08:49

He has absolutely no obligation to pay anything towards your children. However, you don't sound like you're in loving partnership. I can't imagine not wanting to contribute to things my partner can't afford (like a wedding dres or present), if I was able, and it made them happy.

Why did you get married OP? Your lives sound quite separate.

Depends on why she can't afford them as well. Isn't to do with paying bills or having no income

Chocolateistheanswer2026 · Yesterday 15:16

The decent thing to do would be for all income, ie both salaries and the rent, to go into a joint account and then all spending on bills and luxuries to come from that account. He probably won't agree to it as his kids benefit more than yours from the current arrangement. I find it sad that he gets to use his higher salary to help his kids rather than seeing it as joint income so I totally see why you are upset. I don't think I could find your husband attractive in your position.

blueshoes · Yesterday 16:33

animalprintfree · Yesterday 08:49

He has absolutely no obligation to pay anything towards your children. However, you don't sound like you're in loving partnership. I can't imagine not wanting to contribute to things my partner can't afford (like a wedding dres or present), if I was able, and it made them happy.

Why did you get married OP? Your lives sound quite separate.

Of course OP can afford a wedding dress for her daughter. She has a good income and excess rental income to play with.

Her daughter can buy a decent wedding dress for less than £100 off the shelf. There is no reason why her daughter or OP cannot afford a wedding dress.

The problem is OP and her daughter want a cheaper but equivalent wedding dress to the custom made one in the 15-20k range he is buying for his own daughter, simply because he can afford it. OP can afford it except she seems to have frittered away her excess income on unknown 'things'. That is greed and entitlement.

arethereanyleftatall · Yesterday 16:43

Did you marry him just because of his money op?

i think this does make a difference. If a trade has taken place - ie youth/beauty for money - then it does alter things.

Sam9769 · Yesterday 18:53

Timeforachange26 · Yesterday 09:45

Depends on why she can't afford them as well. Isn't to do with paying bills or having no income

No. it;s because she appears to spend all of her salary and rental income remaining after paying SOME of the bills on herself.
Why should she and her ex husband pay towards their OWN DD wedding when her new DH of two years is loaded. He should pay for their daughter's wedding.
It's only fair after all!

Sam9769 · Yesterday 18:54

Looks to me like the OP and her ex husband are a pair of grifters!

InterIgnis · Yesterday 19:00

Aluna · Yesterday 07:55

So do bitter and envious but as you know that was not the point,

Lie is by far the least likely interpretation.

As I explained the cost of the service charge is entirely dependent on the type of fiat. A large conversion flat in a house with no lift and no grounds in an expensive area of London would be minimal compared to a mansion flat in a purpose built block with lifts and large grounds, even in a much less expensive area. The former has much less in the way of services to charge.

OP has said since the start she has a good deal, so that’s hardly revolutionary

“I pay all the bills” was a lie. She doesn’t. he contributes more towards their joint life than she does.

Op has two good incomes and little in the way of outgoings. She’s perfectly capable of saving if she wanted to. That she doesn’t want to, doesn’t oblige her husband to cover the responsibilities she does have.

Vespanest · Yesterday 19:21

Reading this thread is bonkers, where does the excess rental income and salary go. It kept swinging from I can't afford to pay towards a wedding to the sharing of bills is fair and there's an excess.

blueshoes · Yesterday 21:12

arethereanyleftatall · Yesterday 16:43

Did you marry him just because of his money op?

i think this does make a difference. If a trade has taken place - ie youth/beauty for money - then it does alter things.

You may be on to something here.

Perhaps the 'things' which OP spends her entire income on (leaving her with nothing to spend on her dd's wedding) are self-care, gym, clothes and beauty treatments to keep herself looking good.

It could be that the deal is so long as OP keeps herself in good shape, her dh will look after her financially, hence she does not need to save. She thinks it is understood he will also picks up the bulk of the expenses (no she does not pay all the bills) and any extras because he is Mr Moneybags.

Except that there is a limit ...

Alternatively, OP is just not very good with money.

SorrellNightwind · Yesterday 23:36

JoshLymanSwagger · 06/08/2026 15:20

Then he can pay half of the Council Tax, Gas, Electricity, Internet, Water and Grocery bills.

Has he even paid for shaving foam or a loo roll since you started to pay for everything?

You're his WIFE. Not a bloody lodger.

He pays 50/50.

In his shoes, as a wife, I was (nearly) contributing that DH as the higher earner wouldn't let me pay more than a % of my salary

At which point the op would have to pay MORE!!!

Endoadnowarrior · Today 00:09

So if the situation was reversed, and you'd decided to move into your mortgage free house and he was renting his out would he be prepared to pay all the bills?

What about food and other consumables? Are the costs of those costs shared?