Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel shocked my 23-year-old daughter is marrying?

759 replies

SlothsRUs · 24/06/2026 11:29

My 23 year old daughter has just announced that she is getting married next year.

I am completely shocked.

Surely it’s not normal anymore to marry that early.

I tried to be joyous and congratulate her but would you be happy?

I want to know why she wants to marry this young.

I know she is an adult and what she does is nothing to do with me but I am really shocked.

OP posts:
6ate9 · 24/06/2026 14:47

Athwart · 24/06/2026 14:27

Or she was young, poor, uneducated and had low expectations. I couldn’t call that any kind of success story.

She was young, poor and in love!!! She and her husband bought a house, had children and both had careers and good work pensions.

What do you base success on?

MrsShawnHatosy · 24/06/2026 14:48

t's definitely good for her to know what marriage is for ie family unit with kids and what the legal ins and outs are. It sounds like his family is richer than yours so maybe it's less of a risk for her to get married than for him?

so what is a marriage for if it doesn’t produce children?

potenial · 24/06/2026 14:50

Very variable depending on general lifestyle, level of education, job setup, friends etc.

Is it a case of her and her friends have decent jobs, living with partners, bought houses, checked off lots of milestones? What about her partner?
Or did she go to uni, only graduate a year or two ago, in an entry level job, living in a rented room in a HMO, still living a 'young and free' city lifestyle? What about her friends and partner?

What's the partner like, and how's their life together?

As someone who went to uni, at 23 I'd been graduated about a year, was still working a shitty job, living in a tiny rented 1-bed flat, still living a bit of a student lifestyle in terms of going out drinking, seeing friends with little notice. Most of my friends moved away for uni, and were living and working in similar situations at that age, for us getting engaged would have been unthinkable, and if we did we wouldn't have had the money to get married (and it's have been fair for parents to point that out).

My sister was engaged at about 23, she stayed with parents and worked full time at 18 rather than going to uni, and had worked a couple of decent jobs, had bought a house in a small town near my parents with her partner, and has several friends with very young children by 23, so her lifestyle fitted in with that.

342524u · 24/06/2026 14:54

SerafinasGoose · 24/06/2026 14:21

I teach students of 18-21. Sometimes they talk to me of their future aspirations. Anecdotally, based purely on these conversations I'd say the prevailing winds have been blowing in this direction for quite a while. They're not talking about the big career; they're talking about marriage and children.

I'm Gen X. This was a generation of women who valued independence and focused on careers and living for themselves first, rather than prioritizing marriage. It's a generalization, I know, but it was a recognised discourse of the 90s and 00s. I married in 2008 aged 36 and kept my own name, as did the majority of women in my profession. Some had children later. Others opted not to have them at all. Then we were told that was wrong too (aren't women always?), that we were squandering our fertility and 'natural' roles as mothers, and that instead of selling out to the patriarchy, we were selling out as corporate kiss-butts instead. Younger women came along and saw the 'superwoman' phenomenon, where some women in full-time careers ended up with the bulk of the housework and childcare still laid on them and thought - probably quite reasonably - 'fuck that'.

Because, for women, it always seems to have boiled down to a choice between career OR family, and as for the spoiled harpies who wanted to 'have it all' (ie both: a thing men have always taken for granted), well that's (yawn) 'SELFISH!' And we all know that's the worst accuastion that can ever be levelled against a female because how the hell dare we?

Okay, this has turned into something of a rant. Basically it's the sort of generational shift we've seen myriad times before, and there does seem to me to be a trend toward marrying younger (and avoiding managerial responsibility in some professions too). In your shoes ,I'd actually likely feel much the way you do, but what I would do outwardly is be delighted for her and keep my opinion strictly to myself.

The economy is shot to shit and the university system dying a death so who is to say the likes of me were right and this generation wrong? The interesting question is where all this will end up.

Edited

Well said. I was one of those who put everything for career first and was lucky enough to have DC as an older mum. Was it the right choice? I do feel I was too extreme, and should have had a better balance in my life.

Nowadays, it really is more easy to have both, (if not at the same time). Employers are far more understanding now. We need to stop thinking "only careers will make you happy" as it's simply not true. I spent years being SAHM which has its own wonderful rewards. Of course, you need to keep finances in mind, if it all goes pear-shaped, but that's what marriage is for really.

MissIonX · 24/06/2026 14:54

Redpaisley · 24/06/2026 13:26

Yes but the world has changed a lot in 18 years. Young people today are different from back then. Also, every family has a different attitude to the age of marrying. In some families people get married late, in some they marry early.

To me it still goes back to when you know, you know. 23 is an adult. We had a house for 3 years by that point, degree educated and starting off in professional careers. Didn't have kids until our 30s so didn't "miss out" on experiences in our 20s we just got to do them and learn and grow together.

Things have changed a lot; not necessarily for the better in some regards.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 24/06/2026 14:54

Athwart · 24/06/2026 14:27

Or she was young, poor, uneducated and had low expectations. I couldn’t call that any kind of success story.

What a bizarre thing to say. The woman mentioned has been happily married for over 60 years and you don't think that's a successful marriage because she was only 16 at the time of the wedding? You know nothing about any other aspect of this woman's life. She may well have been poor and uneducated at the time. Back in the 1950s and 1960s the great majority of the population left school at 15 with no qualifications and started work. A lot of them did very well in spite of that, often because they were able to study for something while working, or just by learning on the job and moving up the ladder, in a way that's much harder now.

BIossomtoes · 24/06/2026 14:57

MrsShawnHatosy · 24/06/2026 14:48

t's definitely good for her to know what marriage is for ie family unit with kids and what the legal ins and outs are. It sounds like his family is richer than yours so maybe it's less of a risk for her to get married than for him?

so what is a marriage for if it doesn’t produce children?

Ours hasn’t. We had enough between us when we met. Your comment is a quite shocking swipe at women who are married and childless.

Tablesandchairs23 · 24/06/2026 14:57

Don't see the problem she's an adult. The relationship isn't new. You said he's a good guy

Differentforgirls · 24/06/2026 14:59

MrsShawnHatosy · 24/06/2026 14:48

t's definitely good for her to know what marriage is for ie family unit with kids and what the legal ins and outs are. It sounds like his family is richer than yours so maybe it's less of a risk for her to get married than for him?

so what is a marriage for if it doesn’t produce children?

You can be happily married and not have children. I didn't get married to have children. I got married because I loved my husband.

moderndilemma · 24/06/2026 15:01

I think the dd and her fiance's decision is sensible. In contrast to the thousands of posts on here where woman become pregnant (deliberately or accidentally) without the legal protection of marriage. The woman (and it is usually the woman) gives up her career, or reduces her career potential, and then finds out years later when a relationship is ending, exactly how vulnerable she hade made herself.

Meanwhile the man has a family life, often a career that is enabled by a supportive partner. No reason then for him to get married, better to protect his own pension and assets.

I also think it is great that your dd and fiance really want to make this commitment. Yes it is a legal contract but marriage is also a celebration of joyous love and excited intention to be together and build a life together.

4timesthefun · 24/06/2026 15:02

chocoluv · 24/06/2026 12:59

I’m not really sure why posters are saying I got married at 20 and have been together for 20 years etc.

Obviously it’s completely different because it was a completely different time back then.

A lot of women felt pressured to get married before they were 30 or were judged for being unwed mothers etc but there isn’t that stigma today and so I’m not sure the comparison is relevant.

I would be gutted if it was my DD but at the same time you only live once and if this is what makes her happy then great!
They can always separate and divorce if they choose to.

Be happy that we live in a country and a time where women have this choice and the option to leave and divorce at any time.

Um, I’m not sure whether your maths calculations are a tad off, or you just think anyone over 30 is so old you can’t relate to them, but I got married when I was 22, in 2011. Yes; it’s 15 years ago, but I don’t see myself as an old woman talking about life before refrigeration and flushing toilets. There isn’t THAT much that has changed in 15 years. This might sound crazy, but we even had mobile phones and the internet when I got married. Wild times!

Differentforgirls · 24/06/2026 15:02

moderndilemma · 24/06/2026 15:01

I think the dd and her fiance's decision is sensible. In contrast to the thousands of posts on here where woman become pregnant (deliberately or accidentally) without the legal protection of marriage. The woman (and it is usually the woman) gives up her career, or reduces her career potential, and then finds out years later when a relationship is ending, exactly how vulnerable she hade made herself.

Meanwhile the man has a family life, often a career that is enabled by a supportive partner. No reason then for him to get married, better to protect his own pension and assets.

I also think it is great that your dd and fiance really want to make this commitment. Yes it is a legal contract but marriage is also a celebration of joyous love and excited intention to be together and build a life together.

Can you explain the mechanism for becoming "deliberately" pregnant?

Hellometime · 24/06/2026 15:03

She’s got a masters so I’m sure she’s aware of legal implications of marriage. She can take legal advice if she feels need to.

JHound · 24/06/2026 15:04

I think she is lucky to have found her person at 23.

SerafinasGoose · 24/06/2026 15:04

MrsShawnHatosy · 24/06/2026 14:48

t's definitely good for her to know what marriage is for ie family unit with kids and what the legal ins and outs are. It sounds like his family is richer than yours so maybe it's less of a risk for her to get married than for him?

so what is a marriage for if it doesn’t produce children?

It's for commitment to one partner, intended to be for life.

Whether or not it 'produces children' is immaterial.

ANiceBigCupOfTea · 24/06/2026 15:05

I got married when I was 24 and now I'm 34 and about to celebrate our ten year wedding anniversary.

pimplebum · 24/06/2026 15:06

RollonSpringplease · 24/06/2026 11:33

I'm shocked that you are shocked. It's a perfectly normal age to get married. She's already mature enough and not a child. I was 23.

Its not even close to a normal age to get married in white British culture ,

average age is 29

yes id be very concerned but smile and wish them well

NoSoapJustUseShowerGel · 24/06/2026 15:08

potenial · 24/06/2026 14:50

Very variable depending on general lifestyle, level of education, job setup, friends etc.

Is it a case of her and her friends have decent jobs, living with partners, bought houses, checked off lots of milestones? What about her partner?
Or did she go to uni, only graduate a year or two ago, in an entry level job, living in a rented room in a HMO, still living a 'young and free' city lifestyle? What about her friends and partner?

What's the partner like, and how's their life together?

As someone who went to uni, at 23 I'd been graduated about a year, was still working a shitty job, living in a tiny rented 1-bed flat, still living a bit of a student lifestyle in terms of going out drinking, seeing friends with little notice. Most of my friends moved away for uni, and were living and working in similar situations at that age, for us getting engaged would have been unthinkable, and if we did we wouldn't have had the money to get married (and it's have been fair for parents to point that out).

My sister was engaged at about 23, she stayed with parents and worked full time at 18 rather than going to uni, and had worked a couple of decent jobs, had bought a house in a small town near my parents with her partner, and has several friends with very young children by 23, so her lifestyle fitted in with that.

“we wouldn't have had the money to get married”

Why do you need money to get married?

You don’t need a big fancy wedding

You don’t need a mortgage

You don’t need to have children anytime soon (or at all).

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 24/06/2026 15:08

saraclara · 24/06/2026 14:25

This is just anecdote though. I got married at 23, and all of my close friends from that era did too. And we're all still happily married (or widowed at the end of a long, happy marriage).

It's really only in the last very few decades that marriage/having children etc has been a much later decision. In 1987, at 30, I was the oldest in my ante natal classes. Now I'd be the youngest by a stretch, if my DD's ante natal experience experience is anything to go by.

I think that people are now recognising the downside of leaving these things late. There were a variety of reasons that led to later decisions like this, which I'm sure we're all aware of. But it seems youngsters now are recognising the downsides, and starting to buck the trend.

We have to stop treating younger adults like children. We're not doing them any favours at all by doing so.

Edited

I agree. I met my husband and got to know his family well over 40 years ago. I was 21 when we married and it was the best decision I ever made. I remember being very surprised when I learned how old his parents had been when they married - they were 36 and 37! Very unusual for a first marriage until quite recently. The late marriages are the blip in history, not the norm.

12234m · 24/06/2026 15:09

SlothsRUs · 24/06/2026 11:57

@fireandlightening Yes more articulate than me. I think this is what I feel but they do seem to have their own friends. She went to Lisbon last month without him.

Well let’s see where we will be in a decade.

Could you sound anymore like you hope it will be over.

GiveMeCoffee637281 · 24/06/2026 15:10

If she's happy, be happy for her.

No one gets everything perfectly.

I know plenty of 35 year old women making TERRIBLE relationship decisions because they are desperate and insecure because of their age.

And having had babies at 35 and 38 myself, I tell you it's hard to have them so, so late (physically). There are advantages but some big disadvantages too.

There is no one way of doing things.

Athwart · 24/06/2026 15:10

pimplebum · 24/06/2026 15:06

Its not even close to a normal age to get married in white British culture ,

average age is 29

yes id be very concerned but smile and wish them well

In Ireland the average age of marriage for straight couples is 35.9 for women and 38 for men. For same-sex couples it’s 39.7 for women and 40.7 for men.

JHound · 24/06/2026 15:10

BIossomtoes · 24/06/2026 14:45

I agree with this. I think history will show late marriage and starting a family to be an aberration. Generations frequently kick back against the norms of those immediately before. In a couple of decades marriage and children in the early 20s will quite possibly be the norm once again.

A marriage doubt it. I see no issue with early marriage but you have ignored some significant societal shifts impacting age at marriage: the existence of effective contraception, greater acceptance of cohabitation / sex outside of marriage / fall in religious observance / greater female autonomy. I cannot see marriage ages reverting to the past without these things changing too.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 24/06/2026 15:11

Differentforgirls · 24/06/2026 15:02

Can you explain the mechanism for becoming "deliberately" pregnant?

Making a conscious choice to have a child as opposed to a contraceptive failure.

NoSoapJustUseShowerGel · 24/06/2026 15:11

MrsShawnHatosy · 24/06/2026 14:48

t's definitely good for her to know what marriage is for ie family unit with kids and what the legal ins and outs are. It sounds like his family is richer than yours so maybe it's less of a risk for her to get married than for him?

so what is a marriage for if it doesn’t produce children?

Yeah just think of all those happily married people who chose never to have children(or couldn’t), how pointless their marriages are 🙄

Swipe left for the next trending thread