I'm absolutely not a Reform voter (not that we had elections in my area yesterday anyway); but let's not pretend that it's only Reform voters who confuse the local elections with the general elections.
The 'traditional' parties' local branches are very happy to get the votes in based on the colour of the rosette they display, when their party is flying high nationally; but then, when their party nationally is mud, they bitterly complain and insist that they have very little to do with the government/shadow government and how horribly unfair it is to punish them for their poor record, and tar them with the same brush.
Let's be honest: how many voters in local elections do their homework and vote for the individual whom they think is the most competent, trustworthy and able; and how many reckon "Well, I'm a Labour/Tory voter in the general election, so I'll vote locally for whomever has that same party next to his or her name"? OR deliberately do the opposite if they want to signal their extreme displeasure to the central party? Vast numbers of them couldn't even tell you the name of the candidate for whom they just voted - they'll only know that "I voted Labour/Conservative/Lib Dem/Reform" or whoever.
It's the same with organisations like the National Trust, the Co-op, Which? Magazine, the caravan Club and countless others... members all have the right to vote for their preferred candidates for leading the organisation at regular intervals, but how many actually ever bother to do so? Ali G once made one of his trademark ignorant comments about just voting for the one with the funniest name; but I don't actually think he was too far off the mark in reality, for all the difference it makes.